Advertisement

Introduction

Chapter
  • 185 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter summarizes the main aims of this book—to study the influence of global ideas on individual actors and to better conceptualize this link within the sociological theory of World Society.

Keywords

World Society Theory Global Ideas Lesbian , Gay , Bisexual , And Transgender (LGBT) Cultural-cognitive Elements Human Rights 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References and Further Readings

  1. Almond, G.A., and S. Verba. 1965. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  2. Beck, U. 1986. Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 1993. Die Erfindung des Politischen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  4. Benford, R.D., and D.A. Snow. 2000. Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26 (1): 611–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyle, E.H., B.J. McMorris, and M. Gomez. 2002. Local Conformity to International Norms: The Case of Female Genital Cutting. International Sociology 17 (1): 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyle, E.H., K. Minzee, and W. Longhofer. 2015. Abortion Liberalization in World Society, 1960–2009. American Journal of Sociology 121 (3): 882–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brechin, S.R. 1999. Objective Problems, Subjective Values, and Global Environmentalism: Evaluating the Postmaterialist Argument and Challenging a New Explanation. Social Science Quarterly 80 (4): 793–808.Google Scholar
  8. Brechin, S., and W. Kempton. 1997. Beyond Postmaterialist Values: National Versus Individual Explanations of Global Environmentalism. Social Science Quarterly 78 (1): 16–20.Google Scholar
  9. Bromley, P., J.W. Meyer, and F.O. Ramirez. 2011. The Worldwide Spread of Environmental Discourse in History, Civics, and Social Studies Textbooks. Comparative Education Review 55: 517–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bromley, P., and W. Powell. 2012. From Smoke and Mirrors to Walking the Talk: Decoupling in the Contemporary World. The Academy of Management Annals 6: 483–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brulle, R.J. 2000. Agency, Democracy, and Nature. The US Environmental Movement from a Critical Theory Perspective. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Brysk, A. 2013. Human Rights Movements. In The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements (Online).Google Scholar
  13. Cole, W.M. 2017. World Polity or World Society? Delineating the Statist and Societal Dimension of the Global Institutional System. International Sociology 32 (1): 86–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunlap, R.E., and A.G. Mertig. 1997. Global Environmental Concern: An Anomaly for Postmaterialism. Social Science Quarterly 78 (1): 24–29.Google Scholar
  15. Edwards, B., and J.D. McCarthy. 2004. Resources and Social Movement Mobilization. In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, ed. D.A. Snow, S.A. Soule, and H. Kriesi, 116–152. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Frank, D.J., A. Hironaka, and E. Schofer. 2000a. The Nation-State and the Natural Environment over the Twentieth Century. American Sociological Review 65 (1): 96–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ———. 2000b. Environmentalism as a Global Institution: Reply to Buttel. American Sociological Review 65 (1): 122–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gerhards, J., and M. Hoelscher. 2003. Kulturelle Unterschiede zwischen Mitglieds- und Beitrittsländern der EU. Das Beispiel Familien- und Gleichberechtigungsvorstellungen. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 32: 206–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gillham, P. 2008. Participation in the Environmental Movement: Analysis of the European Union. International Sociology 23: 67–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Givens, J., and A.K. Jorgenson. 2013. Individual Environmental Concern in the World Polity: A Multilevel Analysis. Social Science Research 42: 418–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haller, M. 2002. Theory and Method in the Comparative Study of Values. Critique and Alterative to Inglehart. European Sociological Review 18: 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harper, Charles. 2012. Environment and Society. Human Perspectives on Environmental Issues. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
  23. Hironaka, A. 2014. Greening the Globe. World Society and Environmental Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Inglehart, R. 1989. Kultureller Umbruch. Wertwandel in der westlichen Welt. New York: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  25. Inglehart, R., and W.E. Baker. 2000. Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values. American Sociological Review 65: 19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keck, M., and K. Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kennedy, P. 2006. The Parliament of Man. The United Nations and the Quest for World Government. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  28. Kidd, Q., and A. Lee. 1997. Postmaterialist Values and the Environment. A Critique and Reappraisal. Social Science Quarterly 78 (1): 1–15.Google Scholar
  29. Knight, K., and B. Messer. 2012. Environmental Concern in Cross-National Perspective: The Effects of Affluence, Environmental Degradation, and World Society. Social Science Quarterly 93: 521–537.Google Scholar
  30. Kruecken, G., and G. Drori, eds. 2009. World Society: The Writings of John W. Meyer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Lipset, S.M. 1994 [Original 1959 and 1981]. The Political Man. The Social Bases of Politics. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Longhofer, W., and E. Schofer. 2010. National and Global Origins of Environmental Association. American Sociological Review 75: 505–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marquart-Pyatt, S.T. 2012. Contextual Influence on Environmental Concern Cross-Nationally: A Multilevel Investigation. Social Science Research 41: 1085–1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McAdam, D., J. McCarthy, and M.N. Zald, eds. 1996. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. McAdam, D., S. Tarrow, and C. Tilly. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McCarthy, J.D., and M.N. Zald. 1977. Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory. American Journal of Sociology 82: 1212–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meyer, J.W. 2007. Reflections on Institutional Theories of Organizations. In Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, ed. R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, and K. Shalin-Andersson, 788–809. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. ———. 2009. Reflections: Institutional Theory and World Society. In World Society: The Writings of John W. Meyer, ed. G. Krucken and G.S. Drori, 36–63. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Meyer, J.W., J. Boli, G.M. Thomas, and F.O. Ramirez. 1997. World Society and the Nation-State. American Journal of Sociology 103: 144–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Muench, R. 1986. Die Kultur der Moderne. Ihre Grundlagen und ihre Entwicklung in England und Amerika. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  41. Oreg, S., and T. Katz-Gerro. 2006. Predicting Proenvironmental Behavior Cross-Nationally. Values, the Theory of Planned Behavior, and Value-Belief-Norm Theory. Environmental Behavior 38: 462–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Parsons, T. 1972. Das System moderner Gesellschaften. Weinheim: Juventa.Google Scholar
  43. Rootes, C., and R. Brulle. 2013. Environmental Movements. In The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements (Online).Google Scholar
  44. Scott, W.R. 2014. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas. Interests, and Identities. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Smith, J., and D. Wiest. 2012. Social Movements in the World System. The Politics of Crisis and Transformation. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  46. Snow, D.A., S.A. Soule, and H. Kriesi, eds. 2004. The Blackwell Campanion to Social Movements. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  47. Tilly, C. 2004. Social Movements, 1768–2004. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  48. Van der Hiejden, H.-A. 2006. Globalization, Environmental Movements, and International Political Opportunity Structures. Organization and Environment 19: 28–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations