Advertisement

Introduction

Chapter
  • 178 Downloads
Part of the Studies in Childhood and Youth book series (SCY)

Abstract

In this book’s discussion of young people’s encounters with the digital, we, the authors, speak as and primarily with those who identify or are interpolated as adults; subjects whose sense-making, like that of Mr. Deane, is always already structured by our discursive positioning in linear time as ‘no longer young’. We choose to address adults not because we consider conversations with young people unimportant. To the contrary, we will argue throughout this book that intergenerational dialogue is crucial to navigating the challenges that confront us. Nor, in addressing our audience, is our invocation of the first-person plural (‘we’) intended to gloss the differences that shape diverse groups’ and individuals’ conceptualizations of, access to and use of technology. Rather, the desire is to assert a heterogeneous ‘we’ that nonetheless shares the experience of ‘being adult’—or, at least, of being no longer young—and, generationally speaking, enjoys the privilege of the unmarked case (Livingstone and Third 2017, 661). Acknowledging this, the book draws upon the attitudes, experiences and feelings of a diverse range of young people, who played a central role in the research that is elaborated here. This is deliberate, because adult ways of being have dominated, for too long, how young people and the digital are configured in mainstream debates. We contend that alternative ways of thinking and doing are urgently demanded, and that young people’s insights and experiences are a powerful and necessary resource for such a reorientation.

References

  1. Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Hall Giesinger, C., and Ananthanarayanan, V. (2017). NMC Horizon Report: 2017 Higher Education Edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed, S. (2006). ‘Orientations: Toward a Queer Phenomenology’. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 12(4), 543–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ang, I. (2011). ‘Navigating Complexity: From Cultural Critique to Cultural Intelligence’. Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 25(6), 779–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arendt, H. (1961). Between Past and Future: Six Exercises in Political Thought. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
  5. Armitage, J. (2000). ‘The Kosovo War Took Place in Orbital Space: Paul Virilio in Conversation’. CTheory. Accessed 2 July 2018: https://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/ctheory/article/view/14599/5752
  6. Arneil, B. (2002). ‘Becoming Versus Being: A Critical Analysis of the Child in Liberal Theory’. In D. Archard and C. M. Macleod (eds), The Moral and Political Status of Children, 70–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2016). Household Use of Information Technology, Australia, 2014–15: DataCube 81460DO001_201415. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  8. Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA). (2010). ‘Cybersmart Parents: Connecting Parents to Cybersafety Resources’. Accessed 7 July 2019: https://www.acma.gov.au/-/media/Research-and-Analysis/Information/pdf/connectingparentstocybersafetyresources-pdf.pdf?la=en
  9. Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA). (2014). ‘Aussie Teens Online: Research Snapshot’, 1 July 2014. Accessed 23 February 2017: http://www.acma.gov.au/theACMA/engage-blogs/engage-blogs/Research-snapshots/Aussie-teens-online
  10. Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA). (2016a). ‘Aussie Teens and Kids Online: Research Snapshots’. Accessed 2 July 2018: https://www.acma.gov.au/theACMA/engage-blogs/engage-blogs/Research-snapshots/Aussie-teens-and-kids-online
  11. Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA). (2016b). Communications Report 2015–16. Sydney: Australian Communications and Media Authority. Accessed 21 May 2019: https://www.acma.gov.au/~/media/Research%20and%20Analysis/Report/pdf/ACMA%20Communications%20report%202015-16%20pdf.pdf
  12. Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA). (2016c). ‘Digital Lives of Older Australians: Research Snapshot’. Accessed 2 July 2018: www.acma.gov.au/theACMA/engage-blogs/engage-blogs/Research-snapshots/Digital-lives-of-older-Australians
  13. Australian Cybercrime Online Reporting Network (ACORN). (2017). ‘ACORN Snapshot 1 January – 31 March 2017’. Accessed 2 July 2018: www.acorn.gov.au/sites/g/files/net1061/f/acorn_snapshot_1_january_-_31_march_2017.pdf
  14. Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Beck, U. (2000). The Brave New World of Work. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  16. Black, R. and Walsh, L. (2011). ‘Students in the Lead: Increasing Participation by Young People in a Distributed Leadership Framework’. In T. Mackay and V. Zbar (eds), Leading the Education Debate: Selected Papers from the CSE Series and Occasional Papers, 2007–2010, 240–51. Melbourne: Centre for Strategic Education.Google Scholar
  17. Black, R., and Walsh, L. (2015). ‘Educating the Risky Citizen: Young People, Vulnerability and Schooling’. In K. te Riele, and R. Gorur (eds.), Interrogating Conceptions of ‘Vulnerable Youth’ in Theory, Policy and Practice, 181–94. Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. boyd, d. (2011). ‘Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications’. In Z. Papacharissi (ed.), Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites), 39–58. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. boyd, d. (2014). It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  20. boyd, d. (2015). ‘Social Media: A Phenomenon to be Analyzed.’ Social Media + Society, 1(1), 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  22. Castañeda, C. (2002). Figurations: Child, Bodies, Worlds. London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Castells, M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  24. Chandler, D. (2014). Resilience: The Governance of Complexity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Cohen, S. (2002). Folk Devils and Moral Panic: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers (3rd ed.). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Coleman, S. (2008). ‘Doing IT for Themselves: Management versus Autonomy in Youth E-Citizenship’. In W. L. Bennett (ed.), Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth, 189–206. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Collin, P. (2015). Young Citizens and Political Participation in a Digital Society: Addressing the Democratic Disconnect. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Couldry, N. and McCarthy, A. (eds.) (2003) MediaSpace: Place, Scale and Culture in a Media Age. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Coyne, R. (2001). Technoromanticism: Digital Narrative, Holism, and the Romance of the Real. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Cultivating Digital Capacities (CDC). (2016). ‘Cultivating Digital Capacities’. Accessed 20 May 2019: www.digitalcapacities.org
  31. de Certeau, M. (1988). The Practice of Everyday Life. S. Rendall (Trans). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  32. Derrida, J. (1981). ‘Plato’s Pharmacy’. In Dissemination, 61–172. B. Johnson (Trans.). London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  33. Derrida, J. (1982). Margins of Philosophy. A. Bass (Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Eliot, G. (1860). ‘The Mill on the Floss’. Edinburgh and London: W. Blackwood and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police and Punish the Poor. New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  36. France, A., Freiberg, K. and Homel, R. (2010). ‘Beyond Risk Factors: Towards a Holistic Prevention Paradigm for Children and Young People’. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 1192–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Furlong, A. and Cartmel, F. (1997) Young People and Social Change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) and Family Online Safety Institute (FOSI) (2016). Kids and the Connected Home: Privacy in the Age of Connected Dolls, Talking Dinosaurs, and Battling Robots. Accessed 2 July 2018: https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Kids-The-Connected-Home-Privacy-in-the-Age-of-Connected-Dolls-Talking-Dinosaurs-and-Battling-Robots.pdf
  39. Gasser, U., Maclay, C. M. and Palfrey, J. G. (2010). Working Towards a Deeper Understanding of Digital Safety for Children and Young People in Developing Nations. Harvard Law School Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper Series: Paper No. 10–36; Berkman Center Research Publication No. 2010–7. Cambridge, MA: Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University. Accessed 17 June 2019: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1628276
  40. Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Global Kids Online. (2019). ‘Global Kids Online’. Accessed 21 May 2019: http://www.globalkidsonline.net.
  42. Görzig, A., Livingstone, S. and Haddon, L. (eds.) (2012). Children, Risk and Safety on the Internet: Research and Policy Challenges in Comparative Perspective. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  43. Grassegger, H. and Krogerus, M. (2017). ‘The Data that Turned the World Upside Down’. Motherboard. Accessed 2 July 2018: https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/big-data-cambridge-analytica-brexit-trump
  44. Green, N. (2002). ‘On the Move: Technology, Mobility, and the Mediation of Social Time and Space’. The Information Society 18, 281–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Green, L., Brady, D., Ólafsson, K., Hartley, J. and Lumby, C. (2011). ‘Risks and Safety for Australian Children on the Internet’. Cultural Science Journal, 4(1). Accessed 25 June 2019: https://culturalscience.org/articles/abstract/10.5334/csci.40/
  46. Hackman, R. (2014). ‘Occupy the Minimum Wage: Will Young People Restore the Strength of Unions?’. The Guardian. Accessed 17 June 2019: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2014/jan/26/minimum-wage-young-people-unions-corporations
  47. Harris, A. (2001). ‘Revisiting Bedroom Culture: New Spaces for Young Women’s Politics’. Hecate, 27(1), 128–38.Google Scholar
  48. Harris, A. (2008). ‘Young Women, Late Modern Politics, and the Participatory Possibilities of Online Cultures’. Journal of Youth Studies, 11(5), 481–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Harris, A. (2015). ‘Transitions, Cultures, and Citizenship: Interrogating and Integrating Youth Studies in New Times’. In D. Woodman and A. Bennett (eds.), Youth Cultures, Transitions, and Generations: Bridging the Gap in Youth Research, 84–98. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Harris, A., Wyn, J. and Younes, S. (2007). ‘Young People and Citizenship: An Everyday Perspective’. Youth Studies Australia, 6(3), 19–27.Google Scholar
  51. Hartley, J. (2010). ‘Silly Citizenship’. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(4), 233–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Harvey, D. (1989). The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  53. Herring, S.C. (2008). ‘Questioning the Generational Divide: Technological Exoticism and Adult Constructions of Online Youth Identity.’ In D Buckingham (ed.). Youth, Identity, and Digital Media, 71–92. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  54. Honwana, A. (2014). ‘Waithood: Youth Transitions and Social Change’. In D. Foeken, T. Dietz, L. Haan and L. Johnson (eds), Development and Equity: An Interdisciplinary Exploration by Ten Scholars from Africa, Asia and Latin America, 28–40. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  55. Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., boyd, d., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., Horst, H. A., Lange, P. G., Mahendran, D., Martinez, K. Z., Pascoe, C. J., Perkel, D., Robinson, L., Sims, C. and Tripp, L. (2010). Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out: Kids Living and Learning with New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  56. Ito, M., Davidson, C., Jenkins, H., Lee, C., Eisenberg, M., and Weiss, J. (2008). ‘Foreword.’ In D. Buckingham (ed.), Youth, Identity, and Digital Media, vii–ix. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  57. ITU (International Telecommunication Union) (2014). Measuring the Information Society Report 2014. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union. Accessed 20 June 2019: www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/publications/mis2014/MIS2014_without_Annex_4.pdf
  58. James, A., Jenks, C. and Prout, A. (1998). Theorizing Childhood. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  59. Kelly, P. and Kamp, A. (eds.). (2014). A Critical Youth Studies for the 21st Century. Amsterdam: Brill.Google Scholar
  60. Keltie, E. (2017). The Culture Industry and Participatory Audiences. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. L. S. Roudiez (Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  62. l’Anson, J. (2013). ‘Beyond the Child’s Voice: Towards an Ethics for Participation Rights’. Global Studies of Childhood, 3(2), 104–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lash, S. (2002). Critique of Information. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  64. Lash, S. and Urry, J. (1994). Economies of Signs and Space. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  65. Lefebvre, H. (2000). Everyday Life in the Modern World. S. Rabinovitch (Trans.). London: Athlone.Google Scholar
  66. Lievrouw, L. A. and Livingstone, S. (2006). The Handbook of New Media (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  67. Livingstone, S. and Bulger, M. (2013). A Global Agenda for Children’s Rights in the Digital Age: Recommendations for Developing UNICEF’s Research Strategy. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research. Accessed 2 July 2018: https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/lse%20olol%20final3.pdf
  68. Livingstone, S., Byrne, J. and Bulger, M. (2015b). Researching Children’s Rights Globally in the Digital Age. London: Media@LSE, UNICEF, EU Kids Online. Accessed 12 June 2019: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/62248/.
  69. Livingstone, S., and Haddon, L. (2009). EU Kids Online: Final Report. LSE, London: EU Kids Online. (EC Safer Internet Plus Programme Deliverable D6.5). Accessed 16 May 2019: http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/EUKidsOnline/EU%20Kids%20I%20(2006-9)/EU%20Kids%20Online%20I%20Reports/EUKidsOnlineFinalReport.pdf
  70. Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., Dreier, M., Chaudron, S. and Lagae, K. (2015a). How Parents of Young Children Manage Digital Devices at Home: The Role of Income, Education and Parental Style. London: EU Kids Online, London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
  71. Livingstone, S., Nandi, A., Banaji, S. and Stoilova, M. (2017). Young Adolescents and Digital Media Uses, Risks and Opportunities in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Rapid Evidence Review. London, UK: Gender and Adolescence: Global Evidence (GAGE). Accessed 15 May 2019: https://www.gage.odi.org/publication/digital-media-risks-opportunities/.
  72. Livingstone, S. and Sefton-Green, J. (2016). The Class: Living and Learning in the Digital Age. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Livingstone, S. and Third, A. (2017). ‘Children and Young People’s Rights in the Digital Age: An Emerging Agenda’. New Media and Society, 19(5), 657–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Lupton, D. (1995). ‘The Embodied Computer/User’. Body and Society, 1(3–4), 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Magee, L., Kearney, E., Bellerose, D., Collin, P., Crabtree, L., Humphry, J., James, P., Notley, T., Sharma, A., Third, A., Yorke, S., (2018). ‘Addressing a Volatile Subject: Adaptive Measurement of Australian Digital Capacities’. Information, Communication and Society, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1543441
  76. Magee, L., Neilson, B., Third, A., James, P., Stone, G., Keltie, E., Thomson, R., Bhatia, S. and Huang, Q. (2017). Gen NBN™: 2020 and Beyond, the Future of a Connected Australia. Sydney: NBN Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
  77. Manson, J. (2011). ‘Occupy Wall Street: A New Generation, a New Kind of Leadership’. National Catholic Reporter. Accessed 17 June 2019: https://www.ncronline.org/blogs/grace-margins/occupy-wall-street-new-generation-new-kind-leadership
  78. Marshall, P. D. (1997). ‘Technophobia: Video Games, Computer Hacks and Cybernetics’. Media International Australia, 85, 70–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. McArthur, J. A. (2009). ‘Digital Subculture: A Geek Meaning of Style’. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 33(1), 58–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. McClintock, A. (1995). Imperial Leather: Race, Gender and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  81. McLuhan, M. (1994). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  82. McQuivey, J. (2013). Digital Disruption: Unleashing the Next Wave of Innovation. Las Vegas: Amazon Publishing.Google Scholar
  83. Michael, M. (2012). ‘Anecdote’. In C. Lury and N. Wakeford (eds.), Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social, 25–35. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  84. Milosevic, T. (2017). Protecting Children Online?: Cyberbullying Policies of Social Media Companies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  85. Nelson, B. (2016). Children’s Connected Toys: Data Security and Privacy Concerns. United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation. Office of Oversight and Investigations, USA. Accessed 16 May 2019: https://www.hsdl.org/?abstract&did=797394
  86. Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia (2013). Cybersafety for Seniors: A Worthwhile Journey. Second Interim Report: Joint Select Committee on Cyber-Safety. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  87. Party X. (2015). ‘Party X’. Accessed 28 July 2015: http://partyx.ca/
  88. Piaget, J., and Inhelder, B. (1969). The Psychology of the Child. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  89. Platt, A. M. (2009). The Child Savers: The Invention of Delinquency. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Richardson, I., Third, A. and McColl, I. (2007). ‘Moblogging and Belonging: New Mobile Phone Practices and Young People’s Sense of Social Inclusion’. DIMEA 2007: Second International Conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts, 73–8. Perth: Murdoch University.Google Scholar
  91. Ruddick, S. (2007). ‘Geographies of Young People: The Morally Contested Spaces of Identity by Stuart Aitken and Growing Up Global: Economic Restructuring and Children’s Everyday Lives by Cindi Katz’. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(3), 661–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Smith, D. (1987). The Everyday World As Problematic. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  93. Star, S. L. and Bowker, G. C. (2006). ‘How to Infrastructure’. In L. A. Lievrouw and S. Livingstone (eds), The Handbook of New Media (2nd ed.), 230–45. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  94. Stiegler, B. (2010). Taking Care of Youth and the Generations. S. Barker (Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Swist, T., Hodge, B. and Collin, P. (2016). ‘“Cultural Making”: How Complexity and Power Relations are Modulated in Transdisciplinary Research’. Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 30(4), 489–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Third, A. (2014). Gender and the Political: Deconstructing the Female Terrorist. New York and London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Third, A. (2016a). Researching the Benefits and Opportunities for Children Online: Method Guide 6. London: Global Kids Online. Accessed 2 July 2018: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/71259
  98. Third, A. (2016b). ‘The Tactical Researcher: Rethinking Cultural Studies Research as Pedagogy’. In A. Hickey (ed.), The Pedagogies of Cultural Studies, 98–118. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  99. Third, A., Bellerose, D., Dawkins, U., Keltie, E. and Pihl, K. (2014a). Children’s Rights in the Digital Age: A Download from Children Around the World. Melbourne: Young and Well Cooperative Research Centre. Accessed 6 July 2019: https://researchdirect.westernsydney.edu.au/islandora/object/uws%3A28202
  100. Third, A., Bellerose, D., Diniz De Oliveira, J., Lala, G. and Theakstone, G. (2017). Young and Online: Children’s Perspectives on Life in the Digital Age (The State of the World’s Children 2017 Companion Report). Sydney: Western Sydney University. Accessed 23 May 2019: https://www.westernsydney.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/1334805/Young_and_Online_Report.pdf
  101. Third, A. and Collin, P. (2016). ‘Rethinking (Children’s and Young People’s) Citizenship Through Dialogues on Digital Practice’. In A. McCosker, S. Vivienne and A. Johns (eds.), Negotiating Digital Citizenship: Control, Contest and Culture, 41–59. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.Google Scholar
  102. Third, A., Forrest-Lawrence, P. and Collier, A. (2014b). Addressing the Cyber Safety Challenge: From Risk to Resilience. Melbourne: Telstra Corporation. Accessed 6 July 2019: http://www.telstra.com.au/uberprod/groups/webcontent/@corporate/@aboutus/documents/document/uberstaging_279130.pdf
  103. Third, A., Richardson, I., Collin, P., Rahilly, K. and Bolzan, N. (2011). Intergenerational Attitudes Towards Social Networking and Cybersafety: A Living Lab. Melbourne: Cooperative Research Centre for Young People, Technology and Wellbeing. Accessed 6 July 2019: https://researchdirect.westernsydney.edu.au/islandora/object/uws:11518
  104. Tilleczek, K. and Campbell, V.M. (eds.). (2019). Youth in the Digital Age: Paradox, Promise, Predicament. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  105. Urry, J. (2001). ‘Globalising the Tourist Gaze’. Paper presented at the Cityscapes Conference, Graz, Austria: November 2001. Published by the Department of Sociology, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YN, UK. Accessed 17 May 2019: http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/resources/sociology-online-papers/papers/urry-globalising-the-tourist-gaze.pdf
  106. Urry, J. (2000). Sociology Beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  107. Valentine, G. and Holloway, S. (2001). ‘Technophobia: Parents’ and Children’s Fears About Information and Communication Technologies and the Transformation of Culture and Society’. In I. Hutchby and J. Moran-Ellis (eds.), Children, Technology and Culture: The Impacts of Technologies in Children’s Everyday Lives), 58–78. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  108. van Dijck, J. (2012). ‘Facebook as a Tool for Producing Sociality and Connectivity’. Television and New Media, 13(2), 160–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Vargas, J. A. (2010). ‘The Face of Facebook: Mark Zuckerberg Opens Up’. The New Yorker. Accessed 2 July 2018: http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/09/20/100920fa_fact_vargas?printable=true
  110. Virilio, P. (2000). Open Sky. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  111. Virilio, P. (2001). ‘Perception, Politics and the Intellectual: Interview with Paul Virilio’. In J. Armitage (ed.), Virilio Live: Selected Interviews, 82–96. London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  112. Virilio, P. (1995). The Art of the Motor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  113. Walsh, L. and Black, R. (2018). Rethinking Youth Citizenship after the Age of Entitlement. London: Bloomsbury Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  114. Wajcman, J. (2008). ‘Life in the fast lane? Towards a Sociology of Technology and Time’. The British Journal of Sociology, 59(1), 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Weintraub, H. (2015). ‘Youth Must Fight for 15’. The Huffington Post. Accessed 2 July 2018: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/hannah-weintraub/youth-must-fight-for-15_b_6981056.html
  116. White, R. and Wyn, J. (2004). Youth and Society: Exploring the Social Dynamics of Youth Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  117. Wilken, R. and Goggin, G. (2012). ‘Mobilizing Place: Conceptual Currents and Controversies’. In R. Wilken and G. Goggin (eds.), Mobile Technology and Place, 3–25. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  118. Wood, B. E. (2017). ‘Youth Studies, Citizenship and Transitions: Towards a New Research Agenda’. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(9), 1176–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Woodman, D. and Wyn, J. (2011). ‘Youth Research in a Changing World’. In S. Beadle, R. Holdsworth and J. Wyn (eds). For We are Young and…: Young People in a Time of Uncertainty, 5–28. Carlton, Victoria: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  120. Wyn, J. (2016). ‘Educating for Late Modernity’. In A. Furlong (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Youth and Young Adulthood, 91–8. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  121. Yu, J., Wang, G., and Mu, Y. (2012). ‘Provably Secure Single Sign-On Scheme in Distributed Systems and Networks’. In G. Min, Y. Wu, L. C. (Chris) Liu, X. Jin, S. Jarvis, and A. Y. Al-Dubai (eds.). Proceedings of The 11th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications – The 11th IEEE International Conference On Ubiquitous Computing and Communications: 25–27 June 2012 / Liverpool, United Kingdom, 271–78. Piscataway, USA: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Western Sydney UniversitySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.University of Western SydneySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Monash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  4. 4.Deakin UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations