Abstract
This chapter examines the politics of foreign policies within the Foreign Policy Analysis (FPA) debate. It is concerned with various interpretations of what defines FPA, tracing different angles with which scholars envisioned the understanding of foreign policy processes and outcomes. Particular notions of FPDM are presented as the main theoretical tools required to explain the end of the Beagle crisis. It suggests that the easiest way of grasping what this book means by FPA is to examine the distinctions IR scholars have drawn between explanations emphasizing agency versus structure; domestic versus international factors; or the close analysis of decision making, perception, and status. The aim thus is to identify actor motivation during the crisis by adopting an actor-specific approach. In brief, a focus on agency means ascribing significance to process—the way decisions are made and executed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gertner, A.V. (2016). FPDM: Agents, Structures, and Status. In: Autonomy and Negotiation in Foreign Policy. Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57275-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57275-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-57274-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-57275-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)