Skip to main content

Critical Realism and Gang Violence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Although police officers, health, welfare and educational professionals, local residents and their children in gang-affected neighbourhoods are familiar with the effects of gangs and gang crime (Pitts 2008; Palmer 2009; Harding 2014), some academics remain sceptical (Brotherton and Barrios 2011; Hallsworth 2008, 2013). They argue that notwithstanding the stylistic differences between contemporary youth cultures and those of the past, the contemporary furore surrounding violent youth gangs is akin to the demonising discourses—the ‘moral panics’—which attended the Teddy boys in the 1950s, the mods and rockers in the 1960s, the punks in the 1970s, the lager louts in the 1980s and so on. They argue that these periodic expressions of popular outrage tell us more about the anxieties of an adult public, opinion formers and the media than the behaviour of young people (Hallsworth 2011), for example, claims that the problem of thegangis not the gang itself but the media driven moral panic andgang control industrythat surrounds it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adorno, T., & Horkheimer, M. (1944). The dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments (G. S. Noerr (Eds.), trans: Jephcott, E.). London: Verso Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge, J., Medina, J., & Ralphs, R. (2008). Dangers and problems of doing gang research in the UK. In F. van Gemert, D. Peterson, & I.-l. Lien (Eds.), Street gangs, migration and ethnicity. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge, J., Medina, J., & Ralphs, R. (2011). Collateral damage: Territory and policing in an english gang city. In B. Goldson (Ed.), Youth in crisis: Gangs territoriality and violence. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Balasunderham, A. (2009, April). Gang-related violence amongst young people of the tamil refugee diaspora in London. Safer Communities, 8(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, D. (1996). Can integration succeed? Research into urban childhood and youth in a deprived area of Koblenz. Social Work in Europe, 3(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1966). Whose side are we on? Social Problems, 14(3), 239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, H., Brodie, I., Factor, F., Melrose, M., Pearce, J., Pitts, J., et al. (2013). It’s wrong … But you get used to it, a qualitative study of gang-associated sexual violence towards, and exploitation of young people in England. London: The Children’s Commissioner for England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1989). Reclaiming reality. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R., & Callinicos, A. (2003). Marxism and critical realism: A debate. Journal of Critical Realism, 1(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjerregaard, B., & Smith, C. (1993). Gender differences in gang participation, delinquency, and substance use. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9, 329–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowling, B., & Phillips, C. (2006, October). Young black people and the criminal justice system. Submission to the Home Affairs Committee Inquiry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A., Kennedy, D., Waring, E., & Morrison, A. (2001). Problem-oriented policing deterrence and youth violence: An evaluation of Boston’s operation Ceasefire. The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38(3), 195–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand, A., & Ollerenshaw, R. (2009). Gangs at the grass roots: Community solutions to street violence. London: The New Local Government Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • BRAP. (2012). Stuck: Current approaches to the design and delivery of interventions to address gang-related violence in Birmingham: A research report. Birmingham: BRAP. Accessible at http://www.barrowcadbury.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/stuck-brapresearchreport1.pdf

  • Brotherton, D., & Barrios, L. (2004). The Almighty Latin King and Queen Nation: Street Politics and the Transformation of a New York City Gang. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R. (2012). History, affiliation, tactics and structure of the Gooch Close Gang. Unpublished, Greater Manchester Police.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Social Justice. (2008). Broken Britain. London: Centre for Social Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Social Justice. (2009). Dying to belong: An in-depth review of street gangs in Britain. London: Centre for Social Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIRV. (2011). The violence must stop. Glasgow: CIRV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, D. (2013).David Cummings on Startups. https://davidcummings.org/2013/12/27/overestimate-the-next-two-years-and-underestimate-the-next-ten.

  • Davies, A. (1998). Street gangs, crime and policing in Glasgow during the 1930s: The case of the beehive boys. Social History, 23(3), 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, T., van Staden, L., Nicholas, S., & Feist, A. (2010). Process evaluation of data sharing between emergency departments and community safety partnerships in the South East (Home Office Research Report 46). London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Disley, E., & Liddle, M. (2015). Urban street gangs in ending gang and youth violence areas: Local perceptions of the nature of gangs and whether they have changed in the last two years. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (2000). The civilizing process: Sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P., Coid, J. W., & Murray, J. (2009). Family factors in the intergenerational transmission of offending. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 19, 109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firmin, C. (2015). Peer on peer abuse: The safeguarding implications of contextualising peer on peer abuse between young people within their social fields. Doctoral Thesis, University Of Bedfordshire, Institute of Applied Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingerbread (2013). http://www.gingerbread.org.uk/content.aspx?CategoryID=365.

  • Hagedorn, J. (2012). A world of gangs: Armed young men and gangsta culture. London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallsworth, S. (2013). The gang and beyond: Interpreting violent street worlds. Basingstoke: Palgrave/Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallsworth, S., & Duffy, K. (2011). Confronting London’s violent street world: The gang and beyond. A report for London council’s centre for social and evaluation research. London: London Metropolitan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallsworth, S., & Young, T. (2008). Gang talk and gang talkers: A critique. Crime, Media and Culture, 4(2), 175–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (2014). The street Casino. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (Ed.). (forthcoming). Global perspectives on youth violence gangs and weapons. Philadelphia: GIB Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. (2010). Murder concentration and distribution patterns in London: An exploratory analysis of ten years of data. Cambridge: University of Cambridge. Accessible at http://www.crim.cam.ac.uk/alumni/theses/Jackson,%20M

  • Katz, J. (1988). Seductions of crime: Moral and sensual attractions in doing evil. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J., & Jackson-Jacobs, C. (2004). The criminologists’ gang. In C. Sumner (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to criminology (pp. 91–124). Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, D. (2007). How to stop young men shooting each other. London, Presentation to the Metropolitan Police Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind (La Pensée Sauvage). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, R. (2014). Realist criminology. Basingstoke: Palgrave/Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, D. (1965). The Negro family: The case for national action. Washington, DC: Office of Policy Planning and Research, U.S. Department of Labor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C. (1984). Losing ground: American social policy 1950–1980. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muncie, J., & Hughes, G. (2002). Modes of Youth Governance: Political Rationalities, Criminalization and Resistance. In J. Muncie & G. Hughes (Eds.) Youth Justice: Critical Readings. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, S. (2009). The origins and emergence of youth ‘gangs’ in a British inner‐city neighbourhood. Safer Communities,8(2) 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, O., & Fosse, E. (2015). The cultural matrix: Understanding black youth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pitts, J. (2008). Reluctant gangsters: The changing face of youth crime. Cullompton: Willan Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryce, K. (1979). Endless pressure. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, N. (2009, November). ‘Ceasefire’: A public health approach to reducing shootings and killings. Washington, National Institute for Justice, 264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1996). The death of the social? Refiguring the territory of government. Economy and Society, 25(3), 327–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodger, J. (2008). Criminalising social policy: Antisocial behaviour and welfare in a de- civilised society. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R., & Lauritsen, J. (1994). Violent victimisation and offending: Individual, situational and community-level risk factors. In A. Reiss & J. Roth (Eds.), Social influences: Understanding and preventing violence 3. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. (1997). Poverty, ethnicity and violent crime. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. (2007). Governing through crime. In I. Friedman & G. Fisher (Eds.), The crime conundrum: Essays on criminal justice. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (2005). The Edinburgh study of youth transitions. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Science Research Unit. (2009). Commissioning public services. London: Institute for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spergel, I., & Grossman, S. (1998). The little village project: A community approach to the gang problem. Social Work, 42, 456–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spergel, I., Curry, D., Chance, R., Kane, C., Ross, R., Alexander, A., Simmons, E., Oh, S. (1994). Gang suppression and intervention: Problem and response. National Youth Gang Suppression and Intervention Research and Development Program, School of Social Service Administration, University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suttles, G. (1972). The social construction of communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. I., & Thomas, D. S. (1928). The child in America: Behavior problems and programs. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, R. (1987). Social theory: Its situation and its task. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Gemert, F., Peterson, D., & Lien, I.-L. (Eds.) (2008). Street gangs, migration and ethnicity. London: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2008). Urban outcasts: A comparative sociology of advanced marginality. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C. (1993). The Nihilistic threat to black America the major enemy of black survival in America is neither oppression nor exploitation but rather the loss of hope and absence of meaning. http://articles.philly.com/1993-05-09/news/25966287_1_black-america-black-business-expansion-second-camp

  • Williams, P. (2014). Police, gangs and racism. http://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/resources/police-gangs-and-racism

  • Wilson, W. J. (1989/2012). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy (2nd ed.). Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. (2011). The criminological imagination. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J., & Matthews, R. (1992). Rethinking criminology: The realist debate. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youth Justice Board. (2007). Groups gangs and weapons. London: Youth Justice Board.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pitts, J. (2016). Critical Realism and Gang Violence. In: Matthews, R. (eds) What is to Be Done About Crime and Punishment?. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57228-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57228-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-57227-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-57228-8

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics