Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series ((IPES))

  • 333 Accesses

Abstract

In the development of a framework for international investments, there was a clear debate between developed and developing countries on what the rules ought to be. At the multilateral level, developing countries fought to have their interests included in the framework for international investments; but at the bilateral level, through Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs), they agreed to the opposite of what they were fighting for at the multilateral level. Certain lenses used to analyse the framework cannot avoid seeing paradoxical behaviour. However, when using the lens of power to analyse the framework, not only can the alleged paradox be resolved, but other challenging questions surrounding the international investment framework can be answered as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Cox, Robert W. 1981. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium - Journal of International Studies vol. 10 no. 2 126–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert. 1957. The concept of power. Behavioral Science 2(3): 201–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolzer, Rudolph. 1981. New foundations of the law of alien property. American Journal of International Law 75: 553–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkins, Zachary, Andrew T. Guzman, and Beth Simmons. 2006. Competing for capital: The diffusion of bilateral investment treaties, 1960–2000. International Organization 60: 811–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grieco, Joseph. 1988. Anarchy and the limits of cooperation: A realist critique of the newest liberal institutionalism. International Organization 42(3): 485–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzman, Andrew T. 1998. Why LDCs sign treaties which hurt them: Explaining the popularity of BITs. Virginia Journal of International Law 38: 639–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettne, Björn, and Fredrik Söderbaum. 2005. Civilian power or soft imperialism? The EU as global actor and the role of interregionalism. European Foreign Affairs Review 10: 535–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane Robert O. and. Nye Joseph S. 1977. Power and Interdependence. Boston: Little, Brown Company. Barnett, Michael and Duvall, Raymond. 2005. Power in International Politics. International Organization 59, pp. 39–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S. 1974. The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, Paul. 2009. Power-knowledge estranged. From Susan Strange to poststructuralism in British IPE. In Routledge handbook of international political economy (IPE): IPE as a global conversation (Routledge Handbooks), ed. Mark Blyth. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, Christopher. 1996. Strange fruit: Susan Strange’s theory of structural power in the international political economy. Global Society: Journal of Interdisciplinary International Relations 10(2): 167–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pustovitovskij, Andrej, and Jan-Frederik Kremer. 2011. Structural power and international relations analysis: “Fill your basket, get your preferences”, IEE working papers, vol. 191. Bochum: Institut für EntwicklungsforSchung und Entwicklungspolitik der Ruhr-Universität.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salacuse, Jeswald, and Nicholas Sullivan. 2005. Do BITs really work?: An evaluation of bilateral investment treaties and their grand bargain. Harvard International Law Journal 46: 67–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. 1956 Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, Vol 63(2), pp. 129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, Beth, Frank Dobbin, and Geoffrey Garrett. 2006. Introduction: The international diffusion of liberalism. International Organization 60: 781–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandevelde, Kenneth. 2005–2006. A brief history of international investment agreements. University of California. Davis Journal of International Law and Policy 12: 157–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1984. The politics of the world economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gwynn, M.A. (2016). Introduction. In: Power in the International Investment Framework. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57143-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics