Abstract
Actors do not participate on equal grounds in policy-making, they access the policy process at different times, with diverse backgrounds and are also equipped with different power. Ahrens examines these factors in the context of institutional stability and change by detailing that actors are predominantly aware of their own (working) environment and lack knowledge about rules, resources and routines of others. Ahrens reconstructs actors’ narratives to explore how actors continuously interpret policy content and processes and load them with meaning. The meaning attributed continuously feeds back into the process and the interpretation of the policy content. Ahrens follows the timeline of the Roadmap process and traces shifting power in three consecutive periods: the initial period, the drafting process and the period after the Commission adoption.
You don’t do Europe on your own, you need alliances.
(Interview with Member State Representative)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahrens, Petra. 2005. Top-Down-Umsetzung von Gender Mainstreaming. Berlin: GenderKompetenzZentrum. Accessed October 1, 2013. http://www.genderkompetenz.info/w/files/gkompzpdf/topdown.pdf.
———. 2016. The Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality – Taking Advantage of Institutional Power Play. Parliamentary Affairs 69 (4): 778–793. doi:10.1093/pa/gsw005.
Ahrens, Petra, and Sandra Lewalter. 2006. Das Europäische Institut für Gleichstellungsfragen – Was lange währt wird endlich gut? femina politica 2: 124–127.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. New York: Routledge.
———. 2005. Die männliche Herrschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Chappell, Louise, and Georgina Waylen. 2013. Gender and the Hidden Life of Institutions. Public Administration 91 (3): 599–615.
Connell, Raewyn. 1995. Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Council of Europe/Group of Specialists on Mainstreaming. 1999. Gender Mainstreaming. Conceptual Framework, Methodology and Presentation of Good Practice. Final report of Activities of the Group of Specialists on Mainstreaming (EG-S-MS). Summary. EC (99) 3. Strasbourg.
European Commission. 2005. Communication from the Commission on the Social Agenda. COM(2005) 33 final.
Giddens, Anthony. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
———. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Golub, Jonathan. 2008. The Study of Decision-Making Speed in the European Union: Methods, Data and Theory. European Union Politics European Union Politics 9 (1): 167–179.
Greenwood, Justin. 2007. Interest representation in the European Union. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Haas, Peter M. 1992. Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization 46 (1): 1–35.
Hartlapp, Miriam, Julia Metz, and Christian Rauh (2013). Linking Agenda Setting to Coordination Structures: Bureaucratic Politics Inside the European Commission. Journal of European Integration 35 (4): 425–441.
Hix, Simon. 2006. The European Union as a Polity (I). In Handbook of European Union Politics, ed. Knud Erik Jørgensen, Mark A. Pollack, and Ben Rosamond, 141–158. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hooghe, Liesbet. 2005. Several Roads Lead to International Norms, But Few Via International Socialization: A Case Study of the European Commission. International Organization 59 (4): 861–898.
Hoskyns, Catherine. 2008. Governing the EU: Gender and Macroeconomics. In Global Governance: Feminist Perspectives, ed. Shirin Rai and Georgina Waylen, 107–128. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hubert, Agnès, and Maria Stratigaki. 2016. Twenty Years of EU Gender Mainstreaming: Rebirth Out of the Ashes? Femina Politica 25 (2): 21–36.
Jacquot, Sophie. 2010. The Paradox of Gender Mainstreaming: Unanticipated Effects of New Modes of Governance in the Gender Equality Domain. West European Politics 33 (1): 118–135.
Kauppi, Niilo. 2011. EU Politics. In Sociology of the European Union, ed. Adrien Favell and Virginie Guiraudon, 150–171. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kenny, Meryl. 2007. Gender, Institutions and Power: A Critical Review. Politics 27 (2): 91–100.
König, Thomas. 2008. Analysing the Process of EU Legislative Decision-Making: To Make a Long Story Short. European Union Politics European Union Politics 9 (1): 145–165.
Lang, Sabine. 2009. Assessing Advocacy: Transnational Women’s Networks and Gender Mainstreaming in the European Union. Social Politics 16 (3): 327–357.
Mackay, Fiona, Meryl Kenny, and Louise Chappell. 2010. New Institutionalism Through a Gender Lens: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism? International Political Science Review 31 (5): 573–588.
Mahoney, James. 2000. Path Dependence in Historical Sociology. Theory and Society 29 (4): 507–548.
Mérand, Frédéric. 2011. EU Policies. In Sociology of the European Union, ed. Adrian Favell and Virginie Guiraudon, 172–192. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Putnam, Robert. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization 42: 427–460. doi:10.1017/S0020818300027697.
Schmidt, Verena. 2005. Gender Mainstreaming - an Innovation in Europe? The Institutionalisation of Gender Mainstreaming in the European Commission. Opladen: Barbara Budrich.
Stiegler, Barbara. 2000. Wie Gender in den Mainstream kommt: Konzepte, Argumente und Praxisbeispiele zur EU-Strategie des Gender-Mainstreaming. Bonn: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
Thelen, Kathleen. 1999. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 2: 369–404.
———. 2003. How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis. In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. James Mahoney and Dieter Rueschemeyer, 208–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2004. How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Woodward, Alison E. 2004. Building Velvet Triangles: Gender and Informal Governance. In Informal Governance in the European Union, ed. Thomas Christiansen, 76–93. Cheltenham: Elgar.
Key Documents Documentary Research
European Women’s Lobby: Gender Equality Road Map for the European Community 2006–2010. Brüssel 2005.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ahrens, P. (2018). (Re)constructing Policy-Making Processes: The Actors’ Perspective. In: Actors, Institutions, and the Making of EU Gender Equality Programs . Gender and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57060-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57060-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-57059-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-57060-4
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)