Skip to main content

Spatial Counterpoint and the Impossible Experience of Sgt. Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Critical Perspectives on the Beatles

Part of the book series: Pop Music, Culture and Identity ((PMCI))

Abstract

The mono version of Sgt. Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band presents a unique challenge to the listener. Without the literal spatial cues of stereo, the sonic intricacies of the album correspond with an equally diverse array of issues in spatial perception. The musical/spatial content of each song acts in counterpoint against the structure, lyrical content, and presentation of the album as a whole. The result is a confusing sonic geography that thrives on the often paradoxical nature of such interactions. Contradictory spatial and aural information is thus used over the course of Sgt. Pepper to create an experiential parade that in turn requires listeners to use their own imagination as a means of reconciling what strongly appears to be impossible. In this way, the album has the effect of conveying a quasi-psychedelic experience to the listener: one is allowed the opportunity to make sense of the work’s sounds and spaces in one’s own mind and for one’s own gain. In turn, the listener is encouraged to discover new truths about themselves and the world—a notion that is explicitly embraced as the thematic crux of the album.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Julien for an overview of the issue of establishing a reliable text for Sgt. Pepper.

  2. 2.

    Dockwray and Moore discuss this phenomenon as it is manifested while listening to stereo recordings through headphones, but a number of similar principles apply here.

  3. 3.

    It is difficult to assess the effects of acid on Ringo’s artistic output of the mid-1960s since he bore little of the compositional responsibility for the albums of this time (or indeed through the entirety of the Beatles’ lifespan). His drumming on Sgt. Pepper, however, does demonstrate a heightened attention to an already acute sense of color and sound. Though this can be attributed to his maturing as a performer, it is reasonable to assert that it also reflects a desire to expand the expressive range of the Beatles’ music in response to his own uniquely expanded sense of reality.

  4. 4.

    Significant differences can be observed between the mono and stereo versions of the album throughout. These include (but are not limited to) presented material, keys, song lengths, and the amount of effects applied.

  5. 5.

    It should be noted that Moore’s hearing of the key for “Lovely Rita” is one semitone higher than my own, perhaps owing to his consultation of a different recorded edition. On the 2009 remasters, the stereo version of “Lovely Rita” is just shy of a half step sharper than the mono version.

  6. 6.

    MacDonald attributes this “multifocal mentality” to the development of multitrack recording. With the new ability to layer multiple sounds on top of one another in an elegant fashion, more can be asked of the listener and more can be imbued into the album: “pop shifted from a stable medium of social confirmation to a proliferating culture of musical postcards and diary jottings: a cryptic forum for the exchange of individual impressions of accelerating multifocal change” (24).

  7. 7.

    For an extended discussion on this topic, see BaileyShea.

  8. 8.

    Earlier takes of this section, as can be heard on Anthology 2, utilized a similar amount of reverb on Paul’s vocals as were applied to John’s. The decision to use close microphone placement and no reverb on the final version therefore represents a critical and deliberate compositional choice regarding the spatial effects of this section and song as a whole.

  9. 9.

    The effect was produced by heavy tape delay rather than acoustic means and was implemented live during recording. This enabled John to shape his performance in response to the sound as he heard it through headphones in real time (Martin and Pearson 53).

  10. 10.

    Several pianos and a harmonium, in fact (Lewisohn 99).

  11. 11.

    The concept of a compound melody—implying more than one voice with a single line—is, of course, a fairly standard practice in music from the baroque and substantially predates Bach. In a sense, the idea of writing a fugue for solo violin is not particularly problematic, but it does stand in contrast with the normative stylistic expectations for the form and certainly poses unique challenges to the performer.

Works Cited

  • BaileyShea, Matthew L. “From Me To You: Dynamic Discourse in Popular Music.” Music Theory Online 20.4 (2014): n. pag. Web. 30 June 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatles, The. Anthology 2. Apple Corps Ltd./EMI Records Ltd., 1996. CD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatles, The. Revolver. 1966. EMI Records Ltd., 2009, CD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatles, The. Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band (mono). 1967. EMI Records Ltd., 2009. CD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatles, The. Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band (stereo). 1967. EMI Records Ltd., 2009. CD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatles, The. Yellow Submarine. Dir. George Dunning. 1968. Subafilms Ltd. 1999. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dockwray, Ruth and Allan F. Moore. “Configuring the Sound-Box 1965–1972.” Popular Music 29.2 (2010): 181–197. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, Peter. Echo & Reverb: Fabricating Space in Popular Music Recording 1900–1960. Middletown: Wesleyan UP, 2005. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerick, Geoff and Howard Massey. Here, There and Everywhere: My Life Recording the Music of the Beatles. New York: Gotham Books, 2006. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everett, Walter. The Beatles as Musicians: Revolver through the Anthology. New York: Oxford UP, 1999. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everett, Walter. “Painting Their Room in a Colorful Way: The Beatles’ Exploration of Timbre.” Reading the Beatles: Cultural Studies, Literary Criticism, and the Fab Four. Ed. Kenneth Womack and Todd F. Davis. Albany: SUNY P, 2006. 71–94. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julien, Olivier. “‘A lucky man who made the grade’: Sgt. Pepper and the Rise of a Phonographic Tradition in Twentieth-Century Popular Music.” Sgt. Pepper and the Beatles: It Was Forty Years Ago Today. Ed. Olivier Julien. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008. 148–169. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Mark. Capturing Sound. Berkeley: U of California P, 2004. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary, Timothy. Change Your Brain. Berkeley: Ronin, 2000. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewisohn, Mark. The Beatles Recording Sessions. New York: Harmony Books, 1988. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, Ian. Revolution in the Head: the Beatles’ Records and the Sixties, 2nd ed. London: Pimlico, 2005. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, George and Jeremy Hornsby. All You Need Is Ears. New York: St. Martin’s, 1979. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, George and William Pearson. With a Little Help From My Friends: The Making of Sgt. Pepper. New York: Little, Brown, 1994. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Allan F. The Beatles: Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1997. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reising, Russell. “‘It is not dying’: Revolver and the Birth of Psychedelic Sound.” ‘Every Sound There Is’: The Beatles’ Revolver and the Transformation of Rock and Roll. Ed. Russell Reising. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002. 234–253. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reising, Russell. “Vacio Luminoso: ‘Tomorrow Never Knows’ and the Coherence of the Impossible.” Reading the Beatles: Cultural Studies, Literary Criticism, and the Fab Four. Ed. Kenneth Womack and Todd F. Davis. Albany: SUNY P, 2006. 111–128. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reising, Russell and Jim LeBlanc. “Within and without: Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band and Psychedelic Insight.” Sgt. Pepper and the Beatles: It Was Forty Years Ago Today. Ed. Olivier Julien. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008. 103–120. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Lillian. “The Talk of the Town: Sgt. Pepper.” The New Yorker. 24 June 1967: 22–23. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Naphtali. “The Beatles’ Psycheclassical Synthesis: Psychedelic Classicism and Classical Psychedelia in Sgt. Pepper.” Sgt. Pepper and the Beatles: It Was Forty Years Ago Today. Ed. Olivier Julien. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008. 75–90. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack, Kenneth. Long and Winding Roads: The Evolving Artistry of the Beatles. New York: Continuum, 2007. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteley, Sheila. “‘Tangerine trees and marmalade skies’: Cultural Agendas or Optimistic Escapism?” Sgt. Pepper and the Beatles: It Was Forty Years Ago Today. Ed. Olivier Julien. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008. 11–22. Print.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lubell, G. (2016). Spatial Counterpoint and the Impossible Experience of Sgt. Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band . In: Womack, K., Kapurch, K. (eds) New Critical Perspectives on the Beatles. Pop Music, Culture and Identity. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57013-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics