Skip to main content

Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapeutic Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Psychotherapy is geared to facilitate change. Many types of psychotherapy aim to increase the clients’ contact with their problematic experiences that have been previously vaguely known or avoided. The chapter discusses how conversation analysis (CA) can be used to describe such psychotherapeutic process. Based on the authors’ research on cognitive therapy, systemic therapy and psychoanalysis, it is shown that implicit and explicit orientation to longitudinal development of themes that are worked within the therapy relates to sequential contexts in which they are discussed; the process in which the content of a problematic experience becomes more salient in the interaction unfolds in changing relations between the participants’ actions. The chapter introduces the notion of a ‘focal sequence’ as a point of departure for the investigation of such processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Bercelli, F., Rossano, F., & Viaro, M. (2008). Clients’ responses to therapists’ re-interpretations. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen, & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy (pp. 43–62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bercelli, F., Rossano, F., & Viaro, M. (2013). Supra-session courses of action in psychotherapy. Journal of Pragmatics, 57, 118–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E., & Target, M. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization and the development of the self. New York: Other Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S. C. (2012). Action formation and ascription. In T. Stivers & J. Sidnell (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 103–130). Wiley-Blackwell: Malden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. (2004). From other to self: Learning as interactional change. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melander, H., & Sahlström, F. (2009). In tow of the blue whale: Learning as interactional changes in topical orientation. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(8), 1519–1537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2004). Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 501–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muntigl, P. (2013). Resistance in couples counselling: Sequences of talk that disrupt progressivity and promote disaffiliation. Journal of Pragmatics, 49(1), 18–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norcross, J. C., & Goldried, M. R. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of psychotherapy integration. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peräkylä, A. (2004). Making links in psychoanalytic interpretations: A conversation analytic view. Psychotherapy Research, 14(3), 289–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peräkylä, A. (2005). Patients’ responses to interpretations: A dialogue between conversation analysis and psychoanalytic theory. Communication & Medicine, 2(2), 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peräkylä, A. (2011). After interpretation: Third position utterances in psychoanalysis. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 44(3), 288–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peräkylä, A. (2012). Die Interaktionsgeschichte einer Deutung. In R. Ayass & C. Meyer (Eds.), Sozialität in Slow Motion: Theoretische und empirische Perspektiven (pp. 375–405). Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9(2–3), 219–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation I-II. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, W. B. (2002). Assimilation of problematic experiences. In J. C. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients (pp. 357–365). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, W. B., Elliott, R., Llewelyn, S. P., Firth-Cozens, J. A., Margison, F. R., Shapiro, D. A., & Hardy, G. (1990). Assimilation of problematic experiences by clients in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 27(3), 411–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vehviläinen, S. (2003). Preparing and delivering interpretations in psychoanalytic interaction. Text, 23(4), 573–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voutilainen, L., Peräkylä, A., & Ruusuvuori, J. (2011). Therapeutic change in interaction: Conversation analysis of a transforming sequence. Psychotherapy Research, 21(3), 348–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Voutilainen, L., Rossano, F., Peräkylä, A. (2018). Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapeutic Change. In: Pekarek Doehler, S., Wagner, J., González-Martínez, E. (eds) Longitudinal Studies on the Organization of Social Interaction. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57007-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57007-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-57006-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-57007-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics