Skip to main content

How the “Machinery” of Sense Production Changes Over Time

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

In the current chapter, we seek to document how differences in practice across different occasions can in some cases evidence change in the underlying “machinery” of sense production and, in this way, demonstrate a change in member competence. We track two students, Dana and Stephanie, as they work through a mathematical story problem, first in the second grade and then again in the third. We argue that changes over time to the “machinery” of sense production constitute changes in what counts as competence and studying such changes represents a valid approach to producing a “developmental sociology”. And, in this way, we seek to show how change across time can be studied in an ethnomethodologically informed fashion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Kenilworth corpus can be accessed at: http://videomosaic.org/.

  2. 2.

    The full set of transcription conventions is described in Jefferson (2004). In brief, special brackets are used to mark the onset of overlap between transcribed elements (i.e., turns at talk or other transcribed conduct). Numbers enclosed in single parentheses represent periods of silence measured to a tenth of a second. Standard punctuation marks such as periods and question marks are used to denote delivery with falling (or rising) intonation. Colons are used to display sound stretching. Text enclosed between degree signs represents talk delivered at diminished volume. Annotations supplied by the transcriber are enclosed in double parentheses.

  3. 3.

    Transcripts and video are also available at this persistent URL: https://rucore.libraries.rutgers.edu/rutgers-lib/46062/

  4. 4.

    Transcripts and video are also available at this persistent URL: https://rucore.libraries.rutgers.edu/rutgers-lib/46051/

  5. 5.

    It was noted earlier that the students effected a shift in vocabulary within the fragments, referring to the shirt/pants pairings as “combinations” instead of “outfits” (see also [Episode 2: 3:34;16]). Like the disappearance of further discussion of fashion considerations in the third grade, this terminological shift reflected a shared orientation to extracting relevant features of the story problem from the irrelevant, though, given that they employ the altered vocabulary in both episodes, it did not represent a documented change in practice.

References

  • Carpenter, T. P., & Moser, J. M. (1982). The development of addition and subtraction problem-solving skills. In T. P. Carpenter, J. M. Moser, & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Addition and subtraction: A cognitive perspective (pp. 9–24). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicourel, A. V. (1970). The acquisition of social structure: Toward a developmental sociology of language and meaning. In J. Douglas (Ed.), Understanding everyday life: Toward the reconstruction of sociological knowledge (pp. 136–168). Chicago: Aldine Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. B., & Maher, C. A. (1990). The nature of mathematics: What do we do when we “do mathematics”? In B. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, & N. Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 65–78). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2005). Conditions for promoting reasoning in problem solving: Insights from a longitudinal study. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(3-4), 361–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J. C. McKinney & E. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology: Perspectives and developments (pp. 337–366). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, M. H. (1983). Aggravated correction and agreement in children’s conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 7(6), 657–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W., & Greeno, J. (1985). Understanding and solving arithmetic word problems. Psychological Review, 92(1), 109–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, C. A. (2005). How students structure their investigations and learn mathematics: Insights from a long-term study. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, C. A., & Yankelewitz, D. (2010). Representations as tools for building arguments. In C. A. Maher, A. B. Powell, & E. B. Uptegrove (Eds.), Combinatorics and reasoning: Representing, justifying and building isomorphisms (pp. 17–25). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, C. A., Powell, A. B., & Uptegrove, E. B. (Eds.). (2010). Combinatorics and reasoning: Representing, justifying and building isomorphisms. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, K. (1952). On the interpretation of weltanschauung. In P. Kecskemeti (Ed.), Essays on the sociology of knowledge: The collected works of Karl Mannheim V (pp. 33–83). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, D., & Clayman, S. (1991). The diversity of ethnomethodology. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 385–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation I-II. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, J. W., Fuson, K. C., Ham, M., & Kim, M. S. (1986). An analysis of addition and subtraction word problems in American and Soviet elementary mathematics textbooks. Cognition and Instruction, 3(3), 153–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zemel, A., & Koschmann, T. (2013). Recalibrating reference within a dual-space interaction environment. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(1), 65–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendices

Appendix A

figure 3
figure 4
figure 5

Appendix B

figure 6
figure 7
figure 8

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Koschmann, T., Sigley, R., Zemel, A., Maher, C. (2018). How the “Machinery” of Sense Production Changes Over Time. In: Pekarek Doehler, S., Wagner, J., González-Martínez, E. (eds) Longitudinal Studies on the Organization of Social Interaction. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57007-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57007-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-57006-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-57007-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics