Skip to main content

Addressing Conflict Within an Owners Corporation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multi-Owned Property in the Asia-Pacific Region

Abstract

This chapter examines experiences of conflict within the committees of management in multi-owned property. Drawing on qualitative research in Victoria, Australia, the chapter highlights that many of the committee members interviewed lacked awareness of their responsibilities regarding conflict. Issues such as personality clashes, the expense and complexity of litigation , and the time taken in dealing with disputes were common areas of concern. The interview data reveals that committee members are keen to receive assistance with conflict engagement in order to enable them to address these issues effectively. We therefore argue that more effort is required by legislators to adequately educate and guide committee members to deal with conflict in the manner that is required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Altmann (2015a, b) found evidence that long-term tenants were valued in the Melbourne context.

References

  • ABS. 2014. Melbourne Outpaces Sydney. Australian Bureau of Statistics Media Release. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/lookup/3235.0Media%20Release12013#Melbourn. Accessed 16 Oct 2015.

  • Altmann, E. 2015a. Policy Implications for Governing Australia’s Apartment Communities: Tenants, Committees of Management and Strata Managers. In Housing in 21st Century Australia: People, Practices and Policies, ed. R. Dufty-Jones and D. Rogers, 121–136. Surry: Ashgate. ISBN: 978-1-4724-3113-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015b. How Does High Density Living Impact Third Sector Organisations? An Exploration of Financial and Voluntary Workforce Implications for Non-profit Organisations. Australian and New Zealand Third Sector Review 20 (1): 185–205. ISSN 1323-9163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birrell, B., and E. Healy. 2013. Melbourne’s High Rise Apartment Boom. Centre for Population and Urban Research, 4. http://apo.org.au/node/35798. Accessed 16 Oct 2015.

  • Blandy, S., A. Dupuis, and J. Dixon. 2010. Introduction. In Multi-Owned Housing: Law, Power and Practice, ed. S. Blandy, A. Dupuis, and J. Dixon, 1–12. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. 2012. Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, R.A.B., and J.P. Folger. 2005. The Promise of Mediation: The Transformative Approach to Conflict. 2nd Rev ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, P.T., K.G. Kugler, L. Bui-Wrzosinska, A. Nowak, and R. Vallacher. 2012. Getting Down to Basics: A Situated Model of Conflict in Social Relations. Negotiation Journal 28: 7–43. doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.2011.00324.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. 2002. Social Psychology’s Contributions to the Study of Conflict Resolution. Negotiation Journal 18: 307–320. doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.2002.tb00263.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DOI. 2002. Melbourne 2030. Melbourne: Department of Infrastructure.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dredge, D., and J.E. Coiacetto. 2011. Strata Title: Towards a Research Agenda for Informed Planning Practice. Planning Practice and Research 26: 417–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easthope, H., and S. Judd. 2010. Living Well in Greater Density. New South Wales: Shelter NSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easthope, H., and B. Randolph. 2009. Governing the Compact City: The Challenges of Apartment Living in Sydney, Australia. Housing Studies 24: 243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easthope, H., B. Randolph, and B. Judd. 2012. Governing the Compact City: The Role and Effectiveness of Strata Management. Kensington: City Futures Research Centre, University of NSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easthope, H., J. Warnken, C. Sherry, E. Coiacetto, D. Dredge, C. Guilding, N. Johnston, D. Lamminmaki, and S. Reid. 2014. How Property Title Impacts Urban Consolidation: A Life Cycle Examination of Multi-title Developments. Urban Policy and Research 32: 289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feaver, D., and B. Sheehy. 2015. Designing Effective Regulation: A Positive Theory. University of New South Wales Law Review 38 (3): 961–994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R., and K. Douglas. 2010. Life in a Master Planned Estate: Community and Lifestyle or Conflict and Liability? Urban Policy and Research 28 (4): 451–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, N., and E. Too. 2015. Multi-Owned Properties Law in Australia: A Governance Typology of Issues and Outcomes. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis 8: 451–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J.-F., P. Donegan, C. Chisholm, and M. Oberklaid. 2014. Mapping Australia’s Economy: Cities as Engines of Prosperity. Melbourne: Grattan Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenna, T., and D. Stevenson. 2010. Negotiating Community Title: Residents’ Lived Experiences of Private Governance Arrangements in a Master Planned Estate. Urban Policy and Research 28: 435–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leshinsky, R., and C. Mouat. 2015. Towards Better Recognising ‘Community’ in Multi-Owned Property Law and Living. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis 8: 484–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leshinsky, R., K. Douglas, P. Condliffe, and R. Goodman. 2012. Dispute Resolution Under the Owners’ corporation Act 2006 (Vic): Engaging with Conflict in Communal Living. Property Law Review 2: 39–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, E. 2003. Common Interest Housing in the Communities of Tomorrow. Housing Policy Debate 14 (1–2): 203–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randolph, B. 2006. Delivering the Compact City in Australia: Current Trends and Future Implications. Urban Policy and Research 24 (4): 473–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, S. 2015. Exploring Social Interactions and Sense of Community in Multi-Owned Housing. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis 8: 436–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherry, C. 2008. The Legal Fundamentals of High Rise Buildings and Master Planned Estates: Ownership, Governance and Living in Multi-Owned Housing with a Case Study on Children’s Play. Australian Property Law Journal 16 (1): 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • SoV. 2014. Plan Melbourne. Melbourne: State of Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinney, A., M. Reynolds, M. Wulff, and R. Atkinson, 2011. Gentrification and Displacement: The Household Impacts of Neighbourhood Change. Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute. http://apo.org.au/node/23615. Accessed 16 Oct 2015.

  • Yip, N., and R. Forrest. 2002. Property Owning Democracies? Home Owner Corporations in Hong Kong. Housing Studies 17 (5): 703–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Douglas, K., Goodman, R. (2018). Addressing Conflict Within an Owners Corporation. In: Altmann, E., Gabriel, M. (eds) Multi-Owned Property in the Asia-Pacific Region. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56988-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56988-2_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-56987-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56988-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics