Abstract
Academics and practitioners in Kazakhstan and Russia pay significant attention to the legal aspects of PPP formation and implementation. PPP policy documents, such as the laws on concessions and PPPs within each country, and the Russian-language literature, emphasise a contract to be the only document that can ensure successful management for the partnership’s duration. As a result of this, another common topic is how, and in which direction, to amend legal provisions that determine PPP contract terms. Many scholars (Zusman 2008; Azizov 2009; Glumov 2009; Gusev 2009; Firsova 2012) conclude their studies with observations that the major reason for PPP shortfalls, both existing and potential, is that PPP-governing laws and regulations are underdeveloped, lack specifics and include ‘grey areas’ that are subject to differing interpretations. The most common conclusion is that the laws on concessions and partnerships in each country, and other PPP-related laws and regulations, require further improvement. For example, Glumov (2009) emphasises the need to draft a law on PPPs that would set the guiding principles and the legal basis for PPP formation and management specifically designed for Russia’s regions (oblasti), rather than at the federal level. This law would allow regional governments to use legally defined procedures and instruments to initiate PPP projects, select a private partner and understand how far they can extend their own participation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alpatov, A., A. Pushkin, and R. Japaridse. 2010. Gosudarstvenno-Chastnoye Partnerstvo: Mekhanizmy Realizatsii (in Russian) (Public-private partnership: Implementation mechanisms). Moscow: Alpina Publishers.
Azizov, A. 2009. Vozmozhnosti ispolzovaniya kontsessionnykh soglasheniy v usloviyakh krizisa (in Russian) (Opportunities for concessions in the time of crisis). Korporativniy Yurist 5:1–3.
Brinkerhoff, D., and J. Brinkerhoff. 2004. Partnerships between international donors and non-governmental development organizations: Opportunities and constraints. International Review of Administrative Sciences 70(2): 253–270.
Bult-Spiering, M., and G. Dewulf. 2006. Strategic issues in public-private partnerships. An international perspective. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Firsova, A.A. 2012. Teoriya i Metodologiya Investirovaniya Innovatsionnoy Deyatelnosti na Osnove Gosudarstvenno-Chastnogo Partnerstva (in Russian) (Theory and methodology for investment in innovation activity using public-private partnerships). Saratov: Saratov State University Press.
Fischbacher, M., and P. Beaumont. 2003. PFI, public-private partnerships and the neglected importance of process: Stakeholders and the employment dimension. Public Money and Management 23(3): 171–177.
Glumov, E. 2009. Zakon o gosydarstvenno-chastnom partnerstve: Neobkhodimost’ prinyatiya i predmet regulirovaniya (in Russian). (The law on public-private partnerships: The need for adopting the law and the subject of regulation). Korporativniy Yurist 5:8–11.
Gusev, I. 2009. G.Ch.P. v usloviyakh ekonomicheskogo krizisa: Noviye tendentsii razvitiya (in Russian) (PPPs under the conditions of an economic crisis: New development trends). Jurist 1:23–27.
Hill, C.W. 1990. Co-operation, opportunism, and the invisible hand: Implications for transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review 15(3): 500–513.
Kabashkin, V. 2010. Gosudarstvenno-Chastnoye Partnerstvo v Regionakh Rossiyskoy Federazii (in Russian) (Public-private partnership in Regions of the Russian Federation). Moscow: Delo.
Madhok, A. 1995. Opportunism and trust in joint venture relationships: An exploratory study and a model. Scandinavian Journal of Management 11(1): 57–74.
Ouchi, W. 1980. Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly 25(1): 129–141.
Pankratov, A. 2010. Gosudarstvenno-Chastnoye Partnerstvo v Sovremennoy Praktike: Osnovnye Teoreticheskiye i Prakticheskiye Problemy (in Russian) (Public-private partnership in modern practice: Main theoretical and practical problems). Moscow: Ankil.
Pierre, J. 1997. Conclusions. In Partnerships in urban governance: European and American experiences, ed. J. Pierre, 187–199. London: Macmillan.
Pierre, J., and G. Peters. 2000. Governance, politics and the state. London: Macmillan.
Pierre, J., and G. Peters. 2005. Governing complex societies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pongsiri, N. 2003. Public-private partnerships in Thailand: A case study of the electric utility industry. Public Policy and Administration 18(3): 69–90.
Sedjari, A. 2004. Public-private partnerships as a tool for modernising public administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences 70(2): 291–306.
Varnavskiy, V., A. Klimenko, and V. Korolev. 2010. Gosudarstvenno-Chastnoye Partnerstvo: Teoriya i Praktika (in Russian). (Public-private partnerships: Theory and practice). Moscow: Publishing House of the State University – Higher School of Economics.
Vining, A., and A. Boardman. 2008a. Public-private partnerships. Eight rules for Governments. Public Works Management and Policy 13(2): 149–161.
Vining, A., and A. Boardman. 2008b. Public-private partnerships in Canada: Theory and evidence. Canadian Public Administration 51: 9–44.
Zusman, E. 2008. Kontsessii – perspektivnaya forma privatizatsii (in Russian) (Concessions as a form of privatization). Sliyaniya i Pogloscheniya 7(8):19–25.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mouraviev, N., Kakabadse, N.K. (2017). Partner Interaction Dynamics and PPP Organisational Forms. In: Public–Private Partnerships. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56952-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56952-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-56951-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56952-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)