Skip to main content

Introduction and Context

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Entrepreneurial Paradox
  • 869 Accesses

Abstract

Working as an organizational psychologist in academia and practice, I became increasingly aware of the effect of individual differences in thinking and perception, the impact on interrelationships, and the subsequent influence on growth and performance of the organization. However, I found that the differences in cognitive or structural complexity (Kelly 1955), referred to in psychological theory, did not explicitly inhibit organizational growth and performance in research or in practice. In addition, business and academic literature centered on underperforming or fast-growth organizations, with the result that the interaction of entrepreneurial and senior manager cognition was largely ignored in established entrepreneurial organizations in which the founders were still involved as strategic decision makers with the senior management team. My grounding in classic organizational theory such as lifecycle growth models, psychological contract, systems thinking, and traditional models of management and leadership, provided an intellectual context in which I started to consider the above issues in the entrepreneurship environment. In doing this I was able to bring together my knowledge and experience in organizational development theory (Senge 1990; Handy 1995) and cognitive psychological theory to provide insight into the phenomenon. I began to extend my reading to include how interrelationships and information flow link individuals within the organization, and why it forms an integral aspect of organizational growth and performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A Glossary of terms is provided for consistency and clarity because many concepts referenced have various definitions and interpretations. The following are presented in alphabetical order.

References

  • Achtenhagen, L., Naldi, L., & Melin, L. (2010). “Business growth” – Do practitioners and scholars really talk about the same thing? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(2), 289–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs and economic organization. Amercia Economic Review, 62(2), 777–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E. (2009). Lost in space, out of time: Why and how we should study organizations comparatively. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 26, 21–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A. (1998). Cognitive mechanisms of entrepreneurship: Why and when entrepreneurs think differently than other people. Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 275–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A. (2004a). The cognitive perspective: A valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship’s basic “Why” questions. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 221–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A. (2004b). Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 523–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A., Gaglio, C. M., & Katz, J. A. (2001). The psychological basis of opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial alertness. Small Business Economics, 16, 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bluedorn, A. C., & Martin, G. (2008). The time frames of entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockhaus, R. H., & Horowitz, P. S. (1986). The psychology of the entrepreneur. In D. Sexton & R. Smilor (Eds.), The art and science of entrepreneurship. Cambridge: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buehler, R., Griffin, D., & Ross, M. (2002). Inside the planning fallacy: The causes and consequences of optimistic time predictions in heuristics and biases. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), (pp. 250–270). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz, L. W. (1996). Research on entrepreneurial alertness: Sampling, measurement and theoretical issues. Journal of Small Business Management, 34–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz, L. W., & Barney, J. B. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations, biases, and heuristics in strategic decision making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz., L. W., & Lau, C. (1996). A cross-cultural cognitive model of new venture creation. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 20(4), 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz., L. W., West, G. P., Shepherd, D., Nelson, T., Chandler, G. N., & Zacharakis, A. (2003). Entrepreneurship research in emergence: Past trends and future directions. Journal of Management, 29(3), 285–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bygrave, W. D. (1989). The entrepreneurship paradigm (I): A philosophical look at its research methodologies. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 14(1), 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantillon, R. (1734). Essai sur la nature du commerce en general [Essay on the nature of general commerce. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. (2010). Tacit and explicit knowledge. London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behaviour. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 16(1), 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P. (2005). Entrepreneurial growth. In M. A. Hitt & R. D. Ireland (Eds.), Entrepreneurship (pp. 80–82). Maden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P. (2015). Growth entrepreneurial. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, 3, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., Delmar, F., & Wiklund, J. (2002). Entrepreneurship as growth, growth as entrepreneurship. In M. A. Hitt, R. D. Ireland, S. M. Camp, & D. L. Sexton (Eds.), Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating a new mindset (pp. 328–342). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., Delmar, F., & Wiklund, J. (2006a). Entrepreneurship and the growth of firms. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., Achtenhagen, L., & Naldi, L. (2006b). What do we know about small firm growth? In: The life cycle of entrepreneurial ventures. New York: Springer, 2006, 361–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., Steffens, P., & Fitzsimmons, J. (2009). Growing profitable or growing from profits: putting the horse in front of the cart? Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 388–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., Achtenhagen, L., & Naldi, L. (2010). Small firm growth. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 6, 69–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J. E., & Duncan, R. (1987). The creation of momentum for change through the process of strategic issue diagnosis. Strategic Management Journal, 8, 279–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaglio, C. M., & Katz, J. A. (2001). The psychological basis of opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial alertness. Small Business Economics, 16, 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavetti, G., & Levinthal, D. (2000). Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 113–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1996). Sensemaking in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1226–1230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., Thomas, J. B., Clark, S. M., & Chittipeddi, K. (1994). Symbolism and strategic change in academia: The dynamics of sensemaking and influence. Organization Science, 5, 363–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregoire, A., Corbett, A. C., & McMullen, J. S. (2010). The cognitive perspective in entrepreneurship: An agenda for future research. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1443–1477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy, C. (1993). Understanding organizations (4 ed.). London: Penguin Books Ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, C. (1995). Managing the dream. In S. Chawla & J. Renesch (Eds.), Learning organizations: Developing cultures for tomorrow’s workplace. New York: Productivity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelinek, M., & Litterer, J. A. (1995). Toward entrepreneurial organizations: Meeting ambiguity with engagement. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 19, 137–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (2008). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York: Augustus Kelly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kor, Y. Y., Mahoney, J. T., & Michael, S. C. (2007). Resources, capabilities and entrepreneurial perceptions. Journal of Management Studies, 44(7), 1187–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koryak, O., Mole, K. F., Lockett, A., Hayton, J. C., Ucbasaran, D., & Hodgkinson, G. P. (2015). Entrepreneurial leadership, capabilities and firm growth. International Small Business Journal, 33(1), 89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F., Ireland, R. D., Covin, J. G., & Hornsby, J. S. (2005). A model of middle- level managers’ entrepreneurial behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 29(6), 699–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D.F., Ireland, D.R., Jeffrey G. Covin, J.G.and Jeffrey S. Hornsby, J.S. (2005), A Model of Middle-Level Managers’ Entrepreneurial Behavior, Entrepreeurship Theory and Practice 29, 6, 699–716

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. (2000). Knowledge management: The intellectual revolution. IIE Solutions, October, 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibowitz, J., & Beckman, T. (1998). Knowledge organizations: What every manager should know. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likert, R. (1967). The human organization. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markman, G. D., & Baron, R. A. (2003). Person-entrepreneurship fit: Why some people are more successful as entrepreneurs than others. Human Resource Management Review, 13, 281–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G.A., 1996. The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on our Capacity for Processing Information. Psychological Review, 63 (2), pp. 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2011). Miller (1983) revisited: A reflection on EO research and some suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35(5), 873–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L., & Lloyd-Reason, L. (2013). The interplay of entrepreneurial cognition and senior managers. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 19(2), 276–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1973). Strategy-making in three modes. California Management Review, 2, 44–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1978). Structure et Dynamique des Organisations. Paris: Editions d’Organisations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R., Busenitz, L., & Lant, T. (2002). Towards a theory of entrepreneurial cognition: Rethinking the people side of entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 27(2), 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., Busenitz, L. W., Lant, T., McDougall, P. P., Morse, E. A., & Smith, B. (2004). The distinctive and inclusive domain of entrepreneurial cognition research. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 28(6), 138–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R.K., Busenitz, L.W., Bird, B., Gaglio, C.M., McMullen, J.S. & Morse, E.A. (2007). The Central Question in Entrepreneurial Cognition Research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 312 (1), pp. 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naldi, L., & Davidsson, P. (2015). Entrepreneurial growth: The role of international knowledge acquisition as moderated by firm age. JBV, 29, 687–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crafts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B. (2000). Learning and innovation in organizations and economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B., W.P.M. Van Haverbeke, G.M. Duijsters, V.A. Gilsing and A.V.d.Oord (2007), ‘Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity’, Research Policy, 36, 1016–1034.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palich, L. E., & Bagby, D. R. (1995). Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk taking: Challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 425–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry, S. (2010). Smalltalk: Rhetoric of control as a barrier to growth in artisan micro-firms. International Small Business Journal, 28(4), 378–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E.. (1959/1995). The theory of the growth of the firm (3ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plous, S. (1993). The psychology of judgement and decision-making. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichers, A. E., & Schneider, B. (1990). Climate and culture: An evolution of constructs. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 5–39). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, B. (1993). Systems thinking: Critical thinking skills for the 1990s and beyond. System Dynamics Review, 9(2), 113–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, J. E., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1992). ‘Managing Overconfidence’. Sloan Management Review 33, 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26, 243–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S. D. (2008). Entrepreneurship theory and practice. In Effectuation: Elements of entrepreneurial. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1987). Organizational culture and leadership (2 ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, D. A., Patzelt, H., & Haynie, J. M. (2010). Entrepreneurial spirals: Deviation-amplifying loops of an entrepreneurial mindset and organizational culture. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 34(1), 59–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. A. (2001). The role of tacit and explicit knowledge in the workplace. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(4), 311–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Successful intelligence. New York: Plume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. (Eds.) (1997). Intelligence, heredity, and environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T. A. (1997). Intellectual capital. New York: Currency/Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142–193). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. B., & McDaniel, R. R. (1990). Interpreting strategic issues: Effects of strategy and top management team information processing structure. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 286–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripsas, M., & Gavetti, G. (2000). Capabilities, cognition and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11), 1147–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Avalaibilty: A heuristics for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaghely, I. P., & Julien, P. A. (2010). Are opportunities recognized or constructed? An information perspective on entrepreneurial opportunity identification. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy, L. (1934). Wandlungen des biologischen Denkens. Neue Jahrbücher für Wissenschaft und Jugendbildung, 10, pp. 339–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General systems theory. New York: George Braziller, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., Sternberg, R. J. (1987). Tacit knowledge in managerial success. Journal of Business and Psychology 1: 303–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (2009). Making sense of the organization. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Glossary of Terms

A Glossary of terms is provided for consistency and clarity because many concepts referenced have various definitions and interpretations. The following are presented in alphabetical order.

Adaptive Capacity

 The ability of an organization to adapt when the system in which it operates is changing.

Absorptive Capacity

 A firm’s ability to recognize the value of new information, assimilate it, and apply it to commercial ends which is increased by having prior knowledge.

Causal Ambiguity

 The firm cannot determine the causes of performance due to complexity, tacit information, or complex interactions.

Cognition

 Cognition is defined as the transformation, reduction, elaboration, storage, and recovery of information (Neisser 1967). The use of the phrase ‘entrepreneurial cognition’ refers to the mental representations or schemas that entrepreneurs use to represent new and existing information, decision-making, and opportunity recognition.

Cognitive Duality

 The ability of an individual to use both short cut mental representations and linear causal reasoning when making a decision or evaluating an opportunity.

Continuous Growth

 For the purposes of this study, the concept of established entrepreneurial organizations as continuous-growth organizations is derived from the lifecycle and stage literature (Achtenhagen 2010, Penrose).

Entrepreneur

 The use of the term is consistent with Schumpeter (1934) definition as the founder of a new business and innovator, drawing a distinction between managers and entrepreneurs.

Entrepreneurial Process

 The process approach used by Sarasvathy (2001, 2008) to study entrepreneurial activity captures the interaction between entrepreneurial cognition and senior manager perception in the context of the organization.

Established Organizations

 Established entrepreneurial organizations are regarded as continuous-growth organizations in excess of ten years and are differentiated from early or high-growth companies (Achtenhagen et al. 2010) in lifecycle and stage models.

Explicit Knowledge

 Quantifiable and relatively easily transferred and systematically communicated between individuals. It can be captured and is sometimes documented.

Gestalt Psychology

 The whole is more than the sum of its parts. Developed by German Gestalt psychologists referring to patterns that cannot be reduced.

Growth

 A significant factor in the presentation of the pattern of growth in this book, is that ongoing growth is defined by the established entrepreneurial organizations. These definitions, by the founder and management team, are considered as contributing to the strategic direction of each business reflecting heterogeneity. In addition, but not central to the empirical data presented, is the traditional assumptions and definitions of growth drawn from academic literature to provide an academic framework.

Imprinting

 In line with prior work in psychology, imprinting is time-sensitive (i.e., occurs at sensitive stages of life) learning process that initiates a development trajectory (i.e., produces persistent outcomes).

Interplay

 For the purposes of this study the words interplay or interaction are used interchangeably to describe the reciprocal action between the entrepreneur and senior managers.

Narratives

 Narratives are constructed stories and accounts of events that are shared to convey meaning between individuals.

Ongoing

 When concepts such as cognitive processes, interrelationships and growth and/or behavior occurs during a given period of time, or stops and occurs again.

Organizational Climate

 Shared perceptions of practices, procedures and policies among an organization’s actors with regard to these fundamental properties. (Reichers and Schneider 1990)

Paradox

 Paradox is used here as a set of interrelated concepts that exist at the same time, but persist over a period of time and contradict each other.

Phenomena

 The phenomena in this work is the observable interrelationship between the entrepreneur and senior management over a period of the investigation.

Tacit Knowledge

 Socially and culturally specific knowledge that resides and is stored within individuals. Being understood without openly expressing your thoughts.

Temporal Facets

 Time is given theoretical meaning in this work by defining the points within. There are several examples in the text that reflect the development of changing interrelationship patterns over time.

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Taylor, L. (2017). Introduction and Context. In: The Entrepreneurial Paradox. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56949-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics