Skip to main content

Preparing Nurses for Contemporary Nursing Practice

  • Chapter
Critical Pedagogy in Nursing

Abstract

This concluding chapter considers what nurse educators can do to design and deliver a nursing curriculum fit for the purpose of preparing nurses for the challenge of contemporary nursing practice. The chapter acknowledges while the challenges facing nurse educators are multifactorial and complex, consideration of alternative pedagogies is an educational imperative for nursing. To this end a model for contemporary nurse education is described, which draws together the key arguments in this book, that is, critical pedagogy as a transformative agent and structured opportunities for volunteering as a means of engaging the nursing curriculum in the co-creation imperative. The case is remade for a mindful consideration of alternative pedagogical approaches as a way forward for nurse education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ailey, S., Lamb, K., Friese, T., & Christopher, B. (2015). Educating nursing students in clinical leadership. Nursing Management, 21(9), 23–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, K., Tanner, J., Rutty, J., Astley-Pepper, M., & Hall, R. (2014). Successful partnerships with third sector organisations to enhance the student experience: A partnership evaluation. Nurse Education Today, 33(3), 530–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner, P., Tanner, C., & Chesla, C. (2009). Expertise in nursing practice (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, D. (2011). Nurses fit for purpose, award and practice? International Nursing Review, 58(3), 276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchet Garneau, A., Browne, A. J., & Varcoe, C. (2016). Integrating social justice in health care curriculum: Drawing on antiracist approaches toward a critical antidiscriminatory pedagogy for nursing (2nd ed.). Sydney: International Critical Perspectives in Nursing and Healthcare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britnell, M. (2015). In search of the perfect health system. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council for Healthcare and Regulatory Excellence. (2012). Strategic review of the nursing and midwifery council: Final report. London: CHRE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, S. E., Liu, L. Q., van den Akker, O., & O’Driscoll, M. (2017). The extent, variability and attitudes towards volunteering among undergraduate nursing students: Implications for pedagogy in nurse education. Nurse Education in Practice, 23, 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (2014). Why go to university? Retrieved May 17, 2017, from https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/sideways-view/201403/why-go-university

  • Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or praxis? Lewes: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafford-Letchfield, T., Thomas, B., & McDonald, L. (2016). Social work students as community partners in a family intervention programme. Journal of Social Work, 1–20. ISSN 1468-0173. Published online first.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ham, C., Dixon, A., & Brooke, B. (2012). Transforming the delivery of health and social care: The case for fundamental change. London: The King’s Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussey, T., & Smith, P. (2003). The uses of learning outcomes. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(3), 357–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ironside, P. M. (2004). “Covering content” and teaching thinking: Deconstructing the additive curriculum. Journal of Nursing Education, 43(1), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ironside, P. M. (2006). Using narrative pedagogy: Learning and practising interpretive thinking. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 55(4), 478–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, P. D. (2006). Lesson planning and the student teacher: Re-thinking the dominant model. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(4), 483–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S., & Hill, K. (2003). Understanding patterns of commitment: Motivation for community service involvement. Journal of Higher Education, 74(5), 516–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, A. V. (2009). The curriculum: Theory and practice (6th ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, M. (2010). Awake and aware: Thinking constructively about the world through transformative learning. In T. Warne & S. McAndrew (Eds.), Creative approaches to health and social care education: Knowing me, understanding you. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride, A., & Lough, B. (2010). Access to international volunteering. Non-profit Management and Leadership, 21(2), 195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McSherry, W. (2013). Do nurses care? Retrieved May 18, 2017, from https://blog.oup.com/2013/05/do-nurses-care/

  • Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow-Howell, N. (2010). Volunteering in later life: Research frontiers. Journals of Gerontology Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65(4), 461–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundle, C., Naylor, C., & Buck, D. (2012). Volunteering in health and care in England: A summary of key literature. The King’s Fund, London. Retrieved July 19, 2016, from www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/files/kt/field/field_realted_document/volunteering-in-health-literature-review-kingsfund-mar13.pdf

  • Neary, M. (2003). Curriculum models and developments in adult education. In Curriculum studies in post-compulsory and adult education: A teacher’s and student teacher’s study guide. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, G. (2010). Initiating curriculum revision: Exploring the practices of educational developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 15(1), 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paylor, J. (2011). Volunteering and health: Evidence of impact and implications for policy and practice. London: Institute for Volunteering Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravi, V. (2016). Curriculum development. Raleigh: Lulu Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • RCN. (2014, March 31). Response of the Royal College of Nursing to the Nursing and Midwifery Council consultation on revalidation. London: RCN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renigere, R. (2014). Transformative learning in the discipline of nursing. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(12), 1207–1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes, H., Hadley, L., & Davenport, D. (2013). A comparative analysis of cultural competence in beginning and graduating nursing students. ISRN Nursing, 929764. doi:10.1155/2013/929764

  • Rumay Alexander, G. (2008). Cultural competence models in nursing. Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America, 20, 415–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, H. (2004). Are nurses too clever to care’ and too posh to wash. British Journal of Nursing, 13(10), 581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, J. (1986). Curriculum models: Product versus process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 11, 671–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. K. (2000). Curriculum theory and practice. The Encyclopaedia of Informal Education. Retrieved May 22, 2017, from http://infed.org/mobi/curriculum-theory-and=practice/

  • Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suwaileh, M., & Gwele, N. S. (2005). A curriculum for interprofessional learning. In L. R. Uys & N. S. Gwele (Eds.), Curriculum development in nursing: Process and innovations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dyson, S. (2018). Preparing Nurses for Contemporary Nursing Practice. In: Critical Pedagogy in Nursing. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56891-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56891-5_7

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-56890-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56891-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics