Skip to main content

The Neo-Confucian Vision of Harmony and Its Applicability to Interreligious Peacebuilding

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Violence, Religion, Peacemaking

Part of the book series: Interreligious Studies in Theory and Practice ((INSTTP))

  • 506 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter investigates and assesses the applicability of the resources for promoting interreligious peacebuilding from the Confucian tradition, paying close attention to the vision of he, harmony, as developed by Neo-Confucian scholars. It examines the historical context of Neo-Confucians and critically explores the applicability of their teachings to our contemporary contexts regarding the issues of religious conflicts and peacebuilding. Discussing the socio-political and religious/philosophical scene of China from the birth of Neo-Confucianism in the Tang dynasty and its development in the Southern Song, the chapter pays close attention to how Confucians interacted with Daoism and Chan Buddhism. This context allows for a better understanding of the meaning of the Neo-Confucian vision of harmonious society, and suggests that the distinctively Neo-Confucian vision of harmony could challenge, stretch, or shed fresh light on modern strivings for interreligious peacebuilding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Appleby (2000), p. 7.

  2. 2.

    Coward and Smith (2004), p. 5.

  3. 3.

    Ibid., p. 2.

  4. 4.

    In this chapter, I use the term “syncretism,” “multiple religious belonging,” and “hybridization” interchangeably, despite the subtle difference of how these terms have been used in religious studies, given that they all describe the religious phenomenon of drawing multiple resources in one’s religious life. For a detailed discussion of types of syncretism and how it can be understood in diverse settings, see Hedges (2010), pp. 237–243. Also, Schreiter (1985), pp. 144–158.

  5. 5.

    Religious pluralism, used in a normative way, may refer to strong affirmation of the positive value of religious heterogeneity in a society.

  6. 6.

    Knitter says it is “a newly experienced reality” that other religions no longer exist in distant lands, at least from North American and European perspective. See Knitter (2010), p. 5.

  7. 7.

    Mitchell (2000).

  8. 8.

    Cornille (2002), p. 1.

  9. 9.

    Knitter points out that in our age, religious people have to be religious interreligiously. See Knitter, “Preface”, p. xi.

  10. 10.

    For a detailed discussion of types of syncretism and how it can be understood in diverse settings, see Hedges (2010), pp. 237–243. Also, Schreiter (1985), pp. 144–158.

  11. 11.

    Berling (1980), p. 9.

  12. 12.

    Even Christianity from its beginning to current age always has been “syncretic.” For detailed discussion on this issue, see Hedges (2010), pp. 33–44.

  13. 13.

    Kwok Pui-lan carefully examines how the study of religions has been used for justifying political control of the Western countries over the Third World countries. See Kwok (2005), pp. 189–197.

  14. 14.

    Berthrong and Nagai-Berthrong (2000), pp. 11–21.

  15. 15.

    Berthrong points to the fall of imperial China in the nineteenth century, the community victory in 1949, and Mao’s cultural revolution in 1960s as important events that led to the collapse of Chinese Confucian world. New Confucians are the Confucian scholars who affirm that there is a core of essence of the tradition that is worth saving. Berthrong and Nagai-Berthrong (2000), p. 21.

  16. 16.

    Berling (1980), p. 28.

  17. 17.

    Tu (1989), p. 27.

  18. 18.

    See, Berling (1980), p. 30.

  19. 19.

    Bruce (1973), p. 8.

  20. 20.

    Bruce calls them “Chitans” but for the sake of consistency here I call them Khitans, following Tu Wei-ming.

  21. 21.

    Ibid., p. 9.

  22. 22.

    Ibid., p. 10.

  23. 23.

    Ibid., p. 12.

  24. 24.

    Tu (1989), p. 28.

  25. 25.

    Ibid., p. 28.

  26. 26.

    Berling (1980), p. 46.

  27. 27.

    For more detailed Ming context for syncretism, see Berling (1980), pp. 46–61.

  28. 28.

    Ibid., p. 132.

  29. 29.

    See, Berling (1980), pp. 14–68.

  30. 30.

    The selection of the Confucian texts in this chapter is heavily influenced by Stephen Angle’s book. See Angle (2009), pp. 61–73.

  31. 31.

    Li (2006), p. 583.

  32. 32.

    Ibid., p. 584.

  33. 33.

    Zuo Commentary, Zhao 20. Translation from Chengyang Li himself, quoted from Li (2006), pp. 584–585.

  34. 34.

    Ibid., p. 586.

  35. 35.

    Analects 13:23; translation from Confucius, Bruce Brooks and Taeko Brooks (1998), p. 103.

  36. 36.

    Li (2006), p. 587.

  37. 37.

    Zhongyong 1, Stephen C. Angle’s translation draws freely on Chan [1963, 98] and Ames and Hall [2001, 89–90]. Angle (2009), p. 65.

  38. 38.

    Li (2004), pp. 173–188.

  39. 39.

    Chang (1962), p. 168.

  40. 40.

    Here is an example of how Zhang Zai attempted to engage the crisis with education: “At the beginning of each month he summoned elders together to lecture them on their ethical duties… he had the elders bring his messages to all the residents so that this instructions would be available at every corner.” Chang (1962), p. 170.

  41. 41.

    Zhang Zai, Ximing (Western Inscription), cited in deBary et al. (1960), Vol. I, p. 469.

  42. 42.

    This quotation is taken from Yi and Kalton (1988), p. 57.

  43. 43.

    Yi and Kalton (1988), p. 59.

  44. 44.

    Yi, Hwang, the famous Chosun Neo-Confucian, adopted the Western Inscription in his book The Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning in order to educate Seon-jo, the young king, in 1568.

  45. 45.

    For the list of important critiques on Confucianism past and present, see “Reassessment of the heritage” in Ching (1977), pp. 34–58.

  46. 46.

    Berling (1980), p. 93.

  47. 47.

    Ibid., p. 108.

  48. 48.

    Li (2006), p. 600.

  49. 49.

    Ibid., p. 600.

References

  • S.C. Angle, Sagehood: The Contemporary Significance of Neo-Confucian Philosophy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • R.S. Appleby, The Ambivalence of the Sacred: Religion, Violence, and Reconciliation (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, MD, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • J.A. Berling, The Syncretic Religion of Lin Chao-en (Columbia University Press, New York, 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • J.H. Berthrong, E. Nagai-Berthrong, Confucianism: A Short Introduction (Oneworld, Oxford, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • J.P. Bruce, Chu Hsi and His Masters; An Introduction to Chu Hsi and the Sung School of Chinese Philosophy (AMS Press, New York, 1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Bruce Brooks, A. Taeko Brooks, The Original Analects: Sayings of Confucius and His Successors (Columbia University Press, New York, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Chang, The Development of Neo-Confucian Thought (Bookman Assoc., New York, NY, 1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Ching, Confucianism and Christianity: A Comparative Study (Kodansha International, Tokyo, 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Cornille (ed.), Many Mansions?: Multiple Religious Belonging and Christian Identity (Orbis Books, Maryknoll, NY, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • H.G. Coward, G.S. Smith (eds.), Religion and Peacebuilding (State University of New York Press, Albany, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • W.T. deBary, W.-t. Chan, B. Watson (eds.), Sources of Chinese Tradition (Columbia University Press, New York and London, 1960)

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Hedges, Controversies in Interreligious Dialogue and the Theology of Religions (SCM Press, London, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • P.F. Knitter, Introducing Theologies of Religions (Orbis Books, Maryknoll, NY, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • P.-l. Kwok, Postcolonial Imagination and Feminist Theology (Westminster John Knox Press, Louisville, KY, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Li, Zhongyong as grand harmony: an alternative reading to Ames and Hall’s focusing the familiar. Dao: J. Comp. Philos. 3, 173–188 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Li, The Confucian ideal of harmony. Philos. East West 56(4), 583 (Oct 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Mitchell, Questions of Modernity (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • R.J. Schreiter, Constructing Local Theologies (Orbis Books, Maryknoll, NY, 1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • W.-m. Tu, Confucianism in an Historical Perspective (Institute of East Asian Philosophies, Singapore, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Yi, M.C. Kalton, To Become a Sage: The Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning (Columbia University Press, New York, 1988)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kim, S. (2016). The Neo-Confucian Vision of Harmony and Its Applicability to Interreligious Peacebuilding. In: Irvin-Erickson, D., Phan, P. (eds) Violence, Religion, Peacemaking. Interreligious Studies in Theory and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56851-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics