Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Roads Not Taken: The Coase Conundrum

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
George Stigler

  • 339 Accesses

Abstract

Ronald Coase was ‘at’, rather than ‘of’ Chicago. This statement goes a long way toward explaining how the methodological aim and approach of Ronald Coase differed sharply from that of Chicago. As he, himself, clearly claimed, he was a direct throwback to the Classical Liberalism that defined and formed the characteristic feature of the work of Frank Knight. By exploring and analyzing this distinctive difference, such questions as Coase’s response to the ‘Coase Theorem’ becomes clarified, as does the intent of much of his work. Though generally in line with such leading Chicagoans as George Stigler and Milton Friedman in terms of policy, Coase remained firmly at odds with these figures in his approach to economics and his rejection of what he termed ‘blackboard economics’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berlin, Isaiah (1953) The Hedgehog and the Fox. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, Peter (1987) “Virginia Political Economy: A View from Vienna”, Market Process 5(2): 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronte, Charlotte (1850) “Letter of April 12th to W. S. Williams”, http://www.pemberley.com/janeinfo/janeart.html#swscott1, 8 August 2016.

  • Buchanan, James, and Gordon Tullock (1962) The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannan, Edwin (1903) A History of the Theories of Distribution and Production in English Political Economy 1776–1848 (Second Edition). London: P.S. King & Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, Steven N.S. (1973) “The Fable of the Bees: An Economic Investigation”, The Journal of Law and Economics 16(1): 11–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, John Maurice (1936) “Past Accomplishments and Present Prospects of American Economics”, American Economic Review 26(2): 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald H., and Ronald F. Fowler (1935a) “Bacon Production and the Pig-Cycle in Great Britain”, 2 Economica (n.s.): 142–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald H., and Ronald F. Fowler (1935b) “The Pig-Cycle: A Rejoinder”, 2 Economica (n.s.): 423–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald H. (1937a) “The Nature of the Firm”, 4(16) Economica (n.s.): 386–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald H., and Ronald F. Fowler (1937b) The Pig-Cycle in Great Britain: An Explanation, 4 Economica (n.s.): 55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald H. (1946) “The Marginal Cost Controversy”, Economica (n.s.) 13(51): 169–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald H. (1954) “The Development of the British Television Service”, Land Economics 30(3): 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald H. (1959) “The Federal Communications Commission”, The Journal of Law & Economics 2(1): 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald H. (1960) “The Problem of Social Cost”, The Journal of Law & Economics 3(1): 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald H. (1961) “The British Post Office and the Messenger Companies”, The Journal of Law & Economics 4(1): 12–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald H. (1974) “The Lighthouse in Economics”, Journal of Law and Economics 17(2): 357–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald H. (1988) “The Firm, the Market and the Law”, in The Firm, the Market and the Law (pp. 1–33). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald H. (1992) “The Institutional Structure of Production: The 1991 Alfred Nobel Memorial Prize Lecture in Economic Sciences”, American Economic Review 82(4): 713–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald H. (1994a) “Economists and Public Policy”, in Essays on Economics and Economists (pp. 47–64). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald H. (1994b) “How Should Economists Choose?”, in Essays on Economics and Economists (pp. 15–33). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald H. (1994c) “Adam Smith’s View of Man”, in Essays on Economics and Economists (pp. 95–136). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald H. (1994d) “The Institutional Structure of Production”, in Essays on Economics and Economists (pp. 3–15). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald H. (1997) “Looking for Results”, Reason.com. Jan 1: 1–8. http://reason.com/archives/1997/01/01/looking-for-results/, 4 September 2013.

  • Coase, Ronald H. (2006) “The Conduct of Economics: The Example of Fisher Body and General Motors”, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 15(2): 255–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooter, Robert D. (1982) “The Cost of Coase”, The Journal of Legal Studies 11(1): 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooter, Robert D. (1987) “Coase Theorem”. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. First Edition. Eatwell, John; Murray Milgate and Peter Newman (eds.). Oxford: Palgrave Macmillan. http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde1987_X000351doi:10.1057/9780230226203.2205, 4 May 2017.

  • Friedland, Claire (1993) “On Stigler and Stiglerisms”, Journal of Political Economy 101(5): 780–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Milton (1953) Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, Robert (1916) “The Road Not Taken”, in Mountain Interval, 1. New York: Henry Holt & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, Albert O. (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, Harold (1938) “The General Welfare in Relation to Problems of Taxation and of Railway and Utility Rates”, Econometrica 6(2): 242–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, Nicholas (1934) “A Classificatory Note on the Determination of Equilibrium”, Review of Economic Studies 1(1): 122–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Benjamin, Robert G. Crawford, and Armen A. Alchian (1978) “Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process”, Journal of Law & Economics 21(2): 297–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, Frank H. (1967) “Laissez Faire: Pro and Con”, The Journal of Political Economy 75(6): 782–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, Frank H. (1971) Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, Abba (1944) The Economics of Control. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, John Stuart (1965) Principles of Political Economy. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, Arthur Cecil (1920) The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Walter (1826) “Journal Entry, March 14”, https://janeausteninvermont.wordpress.com/2009/03/13/sir-walter-scott-on-austen-march-14-1826/, 8 August 2016.

  • Stigler, George Joseph (1949) “Monopolistic Competition in Retrospect”, Five Lectures on Economic Problems (pp. 12–24). London: Longmans. Green & Co. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, George Joseph (1960) “The Influence of Events and Policies on Economic Theory”, The American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 50(2): 36–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, George Joseph (1971) “The Theory of Economic Regulation”, The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2(1): 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, George Joseph (1976) “Do Economists Matter?” Southern Economic Journal 42(3): 347–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, George Joseph (1988) Memoirs of an Unregulated Economist. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, George Joseph (1991) “Memorial Service for Ethel Verry”, mimeo. October 28: 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, George Joseph, and Claire Friedland (1962) “What Can Regulators Regulate the Case of Electricity”, Journal of Law & Economics 5(1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Craig Freedman

Authors
  1. Craig Freedman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Craig Freedman

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Freedman, C. (2020). Roads Not Taken: The Coase Conundrum. In: Freedman, C. (eds) George Stigler. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56815-1_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56815-1_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-56814-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56815-1

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation