Abstract
This paper attempts to scrutinize George Stigler’s interpretation of Ricardo’s theory. Like many other marginalists, he assesses Ricardo’s contribution in terms of marginalist theory . This confirms Piero Sraffa’s observation that by the end of the nineteenth century the analytical structure, content and genuine significance of the classical theory had been “submerged and forgotten”. However, Stigler’s textual acuteness allows him to discover irritating elements of Ricardo’s analysis that resist the marginalist interpretation. His irritation can only have been increased by Sraffa’s exposition of Ricardo’s surplus-based theory of profits in volume I of the Ricardo edition. This contradicted a marginal productivity theory of profits . Stigler while praising Sraffa’s edition beyond all measure, refrains however from discussing his interpretation. Things do not change after Sraffa in 1960 publishes a logically consistent formulation of the classical theory of value and distribution. Sraffa’s interpretation challenged Stigler’s ideological position, which the latter, however, did not feel the need, or the possibility, to defend.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Blaug, M. ([1967] 1997). Economic Theory in Retrospect, 5th edn. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Blaug, M. (2009). The trade-off between rigor and relevance: Sraffian economics as a case in point. History of Political Economy, 41(2): 219–247.
Breit, R.W. and Spencer, W. (eds.). (1988). Lives of the Laureates: Seven Nobel Economists. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cannan, E. ([1893] 1967). A History of the Theories of Production and Distribution in English Political Economy from 1776–1848. London: P.S. King. Reprint 1967. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.
Dmitriev, V. K. (1974). Economic Essays on Value, Competition and Utility. English translation of a collection of essays published in 1904 in Russian, edited by D. M. Nuti. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dmitriev’s essay on Ricardo’s theory of value was originally published in 1898.
Faccarello, G. and Kurz, H. D. (eds.). (2016). Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis, 3 vols. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Garegnani, P. (2007). Professor Samuelson on Sraffa and the classical economists. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 14(2): 181–242.
Gehrke, C. (2011). Price of wages: A curious phrase. In R. Ciccone, C. Gehrke, and G. Mongiovi (eds.), Sraffa and Modern Economics, vol. 1. London: Routledge, pp. 405–422.
Gehrke, C., Kurz, H. D., and Salvadori, N. (2003). Ricardo on agricultural improvements: A note. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 50(3): 291–296.
Hagemann, H. (2008). Capital, growth and production disequilibrium: On the employment consequences of new technologies. In R. Scazzieri, A. Sen, and S. Zamagni (eds.), Markets, Money and Capital: Hicksian Economics for the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 346–366.
Hutchinson, T. (1952). Some questions about Ricardo. Economica, 19: 415–432.
Jeck, A. and Kurz, H. D. (1983). David Ricardo: Ansichten zur Maschinerie. In H. Hagemann and P. Kalmbach (eds.), Technischer Fortschritt und Arbeitslosigkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Campus, pp. 38–166.
Johnson, H. G. (1948). An error in Ricardo’s exposition of his theory of rent. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 62: 792–793.
Knight, F. H. (1935). The Ricardian theory of production and distribution. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 1: 3–25 and 171–196.
Kurz, H. D. (2008). Ricardian vice. In W. A. Darity (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 7, 2nd edn. Detroit, MI: Macmillan Reference, pp. 243–247.
Kurz, H. D. (2010). Technical progress, capital accumulation and income distribution in classical economics: Adam Smith, David Ricardo and Karl Marx. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 17(5): 1183–1222.
Kurz, H. D. (2011). On David Ricardo’s theory of profits: The laws of distribution are “not essentially connected with the doctrine of value”. The History of Economic Thought, 53(1): 1–20.
Kurz, H. D. (2015). David Ricardo: On the art of “elucidating economic principles” in the face of a “labyrinth of difficulties”. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22(5): 818–851.
Kurz, H. D. (2016a). Economic Thought: A Brief History. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kurz, H. D. (2016b). David Ricardo (1772–1823). In G. Faccarello and H. D. Kurz (eds.), Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis, vol. I. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, pp. 120–143.
Kurz, H. D. (2017). Is there a “Ricardian Vice”? And what is its relationship with economic policy ad“vice”? Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 27(1): 91–114.
Kurz, H. D. (2018). Power—The bête noire of much of economics. The XXVth Krishna Bharadwaj Memorial Lecture, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, 3rd March 2017. Artha Vijnana, 60(4): 319–376.
Kurz, H. D. and Salvadori, N. (1995). Theory of Production: A Long-Period Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kurz, H. D. and Salvadori, N. (2003). Theories of “endogenous” growth in historical perspective. In H. D. Kurz and N. Salvadori, Classical Economics and Modern Theory. London: Routledge, Chapter 6.
Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics, 1st edn., 1890, 8th edn., 1920. Reprint, reset (1977). London: Macmillan.
McCann, L. and Perlman, M. (1993). On thinking about Stigler. Economic Journal, 103: 994–1014.
Morgan, M. (2012). The World in the Model: How Economists Work and Think. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Neisser, H. ([1932] 1990). Lohnhöhe und Beschäftigungsgrad im Marktgleichgewicht. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv. English translation in Structural Change and Economic Dynamics.
Niehans, J. (1990). A History of Economic Theory: Classic Contributions, 1720–1980. Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins Press.
O’Brien, D. (1975). The Classical Economists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ricardo, D. (1951–1973). The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, ed. P. Sraffa with the collaboration of M. H. Dobb, 11 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Referred to as Works followed by the volume number and page.
Rostow, W. (1990). Theorists of Economic Growth from David Hume to the Present. New York: Oxford University Press.
Samuelson, P. A. (1977). Correcting the Ricardo error spotted in Harry Johnson’s maiden paper. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91: 519–530.
Samuelson, P. A. (1989). Ricardo was right! Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 91(1): 47–62.
Samuelson, P. A. (2000). Sraffa’s hits and misses. In H. D. Kurz (ed.), Critical Essays on Piero Sraffa’s Legacy in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 111–180.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1912). Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1954). History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Shaikh, A. (2016). Capitalism: Competition, Conflict, Crises. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Solow, R. (2010). Stories about economics and technology. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 17(5), 1113–1126.
Sraffa, P. (1926). The laws of returns under competitive conditions. Economic Journal, 36: 535–550.
Sraffa, P. (1951). Introduction. In Ricardo, Works I, pp. xiii–lxii.
Sraffa, P. (1960). Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stigler, G. J. (1941). Production and Distribution Theories: The Formative Period. New York: Macmillan.
Stigler, G. J. (1952). The Ricardian theory of value and distribution. Journal of Political Economy, 60(3): 187–207. Reprinted in Stigler (1965a), pp. 156–197.
Stigler, G. J. (1953). Sraffa’s Ricardo. American Economic Review, 43(3): 586–599. Reprinted in Stigler (1965a), pp. 302–325.
Stigler, G. J. (1958). Ricardo and the 93% labor theory of value. American Economic Review, 48(3): 357–367. Reprinted in Stigler (1965a), pp. 326–342.
Stigler, G. J. (1965a). Essays in the History of Economics. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Stigler, G. J. (1965b). Textual exegesis as a scientific problem. Economica, 32: 447–450. Reprinted in Stigler (1982), pp. 68–71.
Stigler, G. J. (1982). The Economist as Preacher and Other Essays. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Stigler, G. J. (1988). Memoirs of an Unregulated Economist. New York: Basic Books.
Stigler, G. J. (1990). Ricardo or Hollander? Oxford Economic Papers, 42: 765–768.
von Bortkiewicz, L. (1906–1907). Wertrechnung und Preisrechnung im Marxschen System’, three parts. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 23: 1–50; 25: 10–51; and 445–488. English translation of pts. 2 and 3 as ‘Value and price in the Marxian system’ in International Economic Papers, 2: 5–60.
Wicksell, K. (1934). Lectures on Political Economy, vol. I. London: George Routledge & Sons.
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to Tony Aspromourgos, Jurriaan Bendien, Christian Bidard, Harry Bloch, Craig Freedman, Christian Gehrke, Harald Hagemann, Geoff Harcourt, Mark Knell, Heinz Rieter, Neri Salvadori, Shigeyoshi Senga, Anwar Shaikh, Yoshinori Shiozawa and Ian Steedman for valuable comments on earlier drafts of this paper. Any remaining errors or misconceptions are, of course, entirely my responsibility.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kurz, H.D. (2020). Stigler on Ricardo. In: Freedman, C. (eds) George Stigler. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56815-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56815-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-56814-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56815-1
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)