Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

Think Tank Networks in Mexico: How They Shape Public Policy and Dominant Discourses

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Think Tanks and Global Politics

  • 526 Accesses

Abstract

Neoliberal strategies implemented in Mexico from the 1980s onward have rolled back the frontiers of the state from many different economic and social spheres. As a consequence, planning research, monitoring, and evaluation tasks that formerly were undertaken in house by the state are increasingly being outsourced to think tanks, opening many points of access and pressure, both in the executive and legislative apparatus. The field of think tanks becomes more powerful within the national structure of power as the organizations involved in the field weave an increasingly dense network, and as the production and legitimation of policy knowledge and policy discourse are controlled by a smaller group of experts , political intermediaries, and large corporate leaders who have become key links connecting the most influential elites in the region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abelson, D.E. 2000. Do Think Tanks Matter? Opportunities, Constraints and Incentives for Think Tanks in Canada and the United States. Global Society 14 (2): 213–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abelson, D.E. 2004. The Business of Ideas: The Think Tank Industry in the USA. In Think Tank Traditions: Policy Research and the Politics of Ideas, ed. D. Stone and A. Denham. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, J.M. 2008. INEGI: Autonomía abortada. La Jornada, March 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alba Vega, C. 2006. Los empresarios y la democracia en México. Foro Internacional 46 (1): 122–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, R. 1992. Liberalism and Modern Society: An Historical Argument. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Béland, D. 2000. Idées, institutions politiques et production de l’expertise: Une perspective comparative sur le role de think tanks au Canada et aux États Unis. Quaderni. Communication, Technologies, pouvoire 70: 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berain, J. 2015. Organizaciones de la sociedad civil presentan diagnóstico de Parlamento Abierto en México. Transparencia Mexicana. April 13, http://www.tm.org.mx/diagnostico-de-parlamento-abierto-en-mexico. Accessed 21 April 2016.

  • Bleiklie, I., and H. Byrkjeflot. 2002. Changing Knowledge Regimes: Universities in a New Research Environment. Higher Education 44: 519–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. 2005. The Social Structures of the Economy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burris, V. 2008. The Interlock Structure of the Policy-Planning Network and the Right Turning US State Policy. Research in Political Sociology 17: 3–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J.L., and O.K. Pedersen. 2011. Knowledge Regimes and Comparative Political Economy. In Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, ed. D. Béland and R.H. Cox. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, W. 2013. Networks of Cognitive Praxis: Transnational Class Formation from Below? Globalizations 10 (5): 691–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmoulins, L. 2009. Profits symboliques e identité(s): Entre affirmation et dénégation. Quaderni. Communiation, Techonlogies, pouvoire 70: 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leal, A.A. 2008. Inegi: autonomía acotada. Milenio, March 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, E., B. Williams, and N. Confessore. 2014. Foreign Powers Buy Influence at Think Tanks. New York Times, September 6. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/07/us/politics/foreign-powers-buy-influence-at-think-tanks.html?_r=0. Accessed 13 Jan 2015.

  • McGann, J. 2007. Think Tanks and Policy Advice in the United States: Academics, Advisors and Advocates. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGann, J. 2014. 2013 Global Go to Think Tanks Rankings: The Leading Public Policy Research Organizations in the World. Philadelphia, PA: Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program, University of Pennsylvania. http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1007&context=think_tanks. Accessed 15 Nov 2016.

  • Medvetz, T. 2012. Think Tanks in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Medvetz, T. 2014. The Myth of Think Tank Independence. Washington Post, September 9. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/09/09/the-myth-of-think-tank-independence. Accessed 31 Jan 2015.

  • Mendizabal, E., and K. Sample. 2009. Thinking Politics: Think Tanks and Political Parties in Latin America. Lima: Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2003. “Mode 2” Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge. Minerva 41: 179–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, A. 2004. Think Tanks, Public Policy, and the Politics of Expertise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, A. 2011. Ideas, Expertise and Think Tanks. In Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, ed. D. Béland and R.H. Cox. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas-Porras, A. 2009. ‘Cambios en las mecanismos de representación de los actores empresariales en México. ¿Más dispersión o más concentración de poder? In ¿Qué pasa con la representación en América Latina? ed. L. Béjar. México City: Porrúa-Congreso del Estado de México and UNAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. 2015. The Group of 20 Transnational Policy Community: Governance Networks, Policy Analysis and Think Tanks. International Review of Administrative Sciences 81 (4): 793–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D., and A. Denham. 2004. Think Tank Traditions: Policy Research and the Politics of Ideas. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tello Beneitez, M. 2013. Guía de think tanks en España. Colección Interciencias. Valencia: Ediciones Focum. http://www.funciva.org/publicaciones/think-tanks-2ed.pdf. Accessed 23 Feb 2016.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I greatly value Matilde Luna and José Luis Velazco’s comments on the first version of this chapter. I am also very grateful to Alejandro Ruiz for the technical support in carrying out the network analysis and to Martí Medina for his valuable support in constructing the database.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico

    Alejandra Salas-Porras

Authors
  1. Alejandra Salas-Porras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico

    Alejandra Salas-Porras

  2. Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia

    Georgina Murray

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Salas-Porras, A. (2017). Think Tank Networks in Mexico: How They Shape Public Policy and Dominant Discourses. In: Salas-Porras, A., Murray, G. (eds) Think Tanks and Global Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56756-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation