Skip to main content

“All Text is Lost”: Ekphrastic Reading

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Expanding Adaptation Networks

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture ((PSADVC))

  • 659 Accesses

Abstract

Ekphrastic writing attempts to bring a visual work “to life” through the vividness of the writer’s description. More generally, ekphrasis is an invitation to read one representational medium in terms of another. This chapter focuses on ekphrasis as a reading strategy that magnifies, refracts, and opens up a work to significations unavailable or otherwise invisible. I begin with a brief overview of definitions of ekphrasis and the differential relationships they imply and then turn to activities of reading evident in well-known ekphrastic moments in Moby-Dick (1851) and Daisy Miller (1878). In both examples, the prose’s progress appears momentarily “stilled” by the presence of a painting, the contemplation of which “releases” additional narratives. Ekphrasis can likewise reflect more ideologically constructed differences, as I demonstrate in my analysis of Gary Wolf’s hard-boiled detective novel, Who Censored Roger Rabbit? (1981). The novel’s characters are divided into two dominant groups—humans and ’toons—and the latter communicate via word balloons that the narrator, private detective Eddie Valiant, then describes for readers with such detail as to bring them before their minds’ eye in the manner of ekphrasis. Divisions between verbal and visual, between “us” and “them,” maintain the story’s divisions between humans and ’toons. In this chapter, I posit that, in opening up works to additional informing texts, ekphrasis expands readers’ experiences of a work and expands a given work’s larger network of reference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In a footnote to “The Deadly Poppy Field” chapter, Michael Patrick Hearn notes: “It is surprising that someone as fond of flowers as Baum was should introduce so many hostile plants into the Oz books,” The Annotated Wizard of Oz (New York: W.W. Norton, 2000) p. 141, n. 6. Carnivorous and menacing flowers and vegetation appear fairly often throughout the Oz series. For example, The Wonderful Wizard of Oz (1960) includes fighting trees and the poppy fields (which may or may not be consciously menacing), and Dorothy and the Wizard in Oz (1908) includes the Mangaboos, a race of vegetable people, who send unwanted outsiders into “The Garden of the Clinging Vines” to die.

  2. 2.

    Granted, the Scarecrow is disemboweled at several points in the Oz narrative trajectory—most notably by the Wicked Witch of the West’s flying monkeys in several versions of The Wonderful Wizard of Oz—but he also disembowels himself to protect his friends from the swarm of bees.

  3. 3.

    Baum’s original manuscript included a chapter, “The Garden of Meats,” which focused on a race of vegetable people, who farmed humans for food. Baum’s publishers found the chapter too troubling and suggested that he omit it, which he did. Though, as the poem indicates, the chapter is no longer extant, a few of John R. Neill’s illustrations remain. These, combined with Baum’s correspondence and publisher’s notes, provide a rough sketch of what the chapter might have entailed.

  4. 4.

    This chapter focuses primarily on ekphrasis as it manifests in words based on visual art. Several studies have addressed ekphrasis in other media, among them Siglind Bruhn’s Musical Ekphrasis: Composers Responding to Poetry and Painting (Hillsdale, NY: Pendragon Press, 2000) and Sonic Transformations of Literary Texts: From Program Music to Musical Ekphrasis (Hillsdale, NY: Pendragon, 2008), and Linda Sager Eidt’s Writing and Filming the Painting: Ekphrasis in Literature and Film (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2008).

  5. 5.

    Rajewsky does not address ekphrasis specifically in her discussion of intermedial references; she focuses, rather, on dance theater and photorealistic paintings. Important to the distinction between intermedial referencing is that “it is not two or more different forms of medial articulation that are present in their own specific materiality”—the work is not a hybrid combining photograph and painting, but, rather the painting takes on the attributes of the photograph (2010, 58).

  6. 6.

    Laura Sager Eidt provides a succinct overview the history of criticism that casts the so-called tension between words and images in social and ideological terms (2008, 14–16).

  7. 7.

    A number of writers have addressed this moment, among them Howard P. Vincent, “Ishmael, Writer and Critic,” in Themes and Directions in American Literature, ed. Ray B. Brown and Donald Pizer (Lafeyette: Purdue University Press, 1969), and Moore 1982.

  8. 8.

    For Clüver and others writing on ekphrasis, enargeia distinguishes ekphrasis from ordinary description; for others, though, like Yacobi, writing need not demonstrate enargeia to be ekphrastic (Clüver 1998, 37–9, 42).

References

  • Alpers, Svetlana Leontief. “Ekphrasis and Aesthetic Attitudes in Vasari’s Lives.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtlauld Institutes 23, no. 3/4 (July–December 1960): 190–215. JSTOR.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M.M. “Discourse in the Novel.” In The Dialogic Imagination, edited by Michael Holquist, 259–422. Translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, Roland. “From Work to Text.” In Image—Music—Text, 155–164. Translated by Stephen Heath. New York: Hill and Wang, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, L. Frank. Dorothy and the Wizard in Oz. Illustrated by John R. Neill. Chicago: Reilly & Britton, 1908.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Patchwork Girl of Oz. Illustrated by John R. Neill. Chicago: Reilly & Britton, 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Wonderful Wizard of Oz. Illustrated by W.W. Denslow. New York: Dover, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Emerald City of Oz. Chicago: Reilly and Britton, 1910. Lit2Go, 2016. http://etc.usf.edu/lit2go/123/the-emerald-city-of-oz/2179/chapter-25-how-the-scarecrow-displayed-his-wisdom/.

  • Beeder, Amy. Burn the Field. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clüver, Claus. “Ekphrasis Reconsidered: On Verbal Representations of Non-Verbal Texts.” In Interart Poetics: Essays on the Interrelations of the Arts and Media, edited by Ulla-Britta Lagerroth, Hans Lund, Erik Hedling, 19–33. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— “Quotation, Enargeia, and the Functions of Ekphrasis.” In Pictures Into Words: Theoretical and Descriptive Approaches to Ekphrasis, edited by Valerie Robillard and Els Jongeneel, 35–52. Amsterdam: VU University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Michael. “Ekphrasis and the Postmodern Painter Poem.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 42, no. 1 (Autumn 1983): 69–79. JSTOR.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • “Ecphrasis.” Oxford English Dictionary, 2016. http://0-www.oed.com.library.scad.edu/view/Entry/59412?redirectedFrom=ecphrasis#eid

  • Elleström, Lars. “Introduction.” In Media Borders, Multimodality and Intermediality, edited by Elleström, 1–8. New York: Palgrave, 2010a.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ——— “The Modalities of Media: A Model for Understanding Intermedial Relations.” In Media Borders, Multimodality and Intermediality, edited by Lars Elleström, 11–48. New York: Palgrave, 2010b.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Barbara K. Museum Mediations: Reframing Ekphrasis in Contemporary American Poetry. New York: Routledge, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, Stanley. “Interpreting the ‘Variorum.” Critical Inquiry 2, no. 3 (Spring 1976): 465–485. JSTOR.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagstrum, Jean H. The Sister Arts: The Tradition of Literary Pictorialism and English Poetry from Dryden to Gray. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardie, Philip. Ovid’s Poetics of Illusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan, James A. W. “Entering the Museum of Words: Ashbery’s ‘Self-Portrait in a Convex Mirror.” Pictures Into Words: Theoretical and Descriptive Approaches to Ekphrasis, edited by Valerie Robillard and Els Jongeneel, 189–211. Amsterdam: VU University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Ekphrasis and Representation.” New Literary History 22, no.2 (Spring 1991): 297–316. JSTOR.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, John. The Gazer’s Spirit: Poems Speaking to Silent Works of Art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “The Poetics of Ekphrasis.” Word & Image 4.1 (1988): 209–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, Henry. Daisy Miller & An International Episode. Illustrated by H.W. McVickar. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, Murray. “Ekphrasis and the Still Movement of Poetry; or Laokoön Revisited.” In The Poet as Critic, edited by Frederick P. W. McDowell, 3–26. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— “The Problem of Ekphrasis: Image and Words, Space and Time—and the Literary Work.” In Pictures Into Words: Theoretical and Descriptive Approaches to Ekphrasis, edited by Valerie Robillard and Els Jongeneel, 3–20. Amsterdam: VU University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim. Laocoön: An Essay Upon the Limits of Painting and Poetry [1766]. Translated by Ellen Frothingham. Boston: Roberts Brothers, 1874.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, Gregory. Wicked: The Life and Times of the Wicked Witch of the West. New York: HarperCollins, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloud, Scott. Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. New York: HarperCollins, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melville, Herman. Moby-Dick; or, The Whale. New York: Penguin, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, Jeffrey. “Velázquez and ‘Daisy Miller.’” Studies in Short Fiction 16.3 (Summer 1979): 171–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. Hillis. “What Do Stories About Pictures Want.” Critical Inquiry 34, no. S2 (Winter 2008): S59-S97. JSTOR.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W.J.T. Picture Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Richard S. That Cunning Alphabet: Melville’s Aesthetics of Nature. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persin, Margaret H. Getting the Picture: The Ekphrastic Principle in Twentieth-Century Spanish Poetry. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajewsky, Irina O. “Border Talks: The Problematic Status of Media Borders in the Current Debate About Intermediality.” In Media Borders, Multimodality and Intermediality, edited by Lars Elleström, 51–68. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • “Representation.” Oxford English Dictionary, 2016. http://0-www.oed.com.library.scad.edu/view/Entry/162997?rskey=zuK5sw&result=1&isAdvanced=false#eid.

  • Rischin, Abigail S. “Beside the Reclining Statue: Ekphrasis, Narrative, and Desire in Middlemarch. ” PMLA 111, no. 5 (October 1996): 1121–1132. JSTOR.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robillard, Valerie. “In Pursuit of Ekphrasis (an intertextual approach).” Pictures Into Words: Theoretical and Descriptive Approaches to Ekphrasis. edited by Valerie Robillard and Els Jongeneel. Amsterdam: VU University Press, 1998. 53-72. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruskin, John. Modern Painters. Volume 1. London: Smith, Elder, and Co., 1848.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sager Eidt, Laura M. Writing and Filming the Painting: Ekphrasis in Literature and Film. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • “A Scamper Through the Exhibition of the Royal Academy.” Punch, Or the London Charivari. Vol. 8, 233–234. 1845. https://books.google.com/books.

  • Scott, Grant F. “The Rhetorical of Dilation: Ekphrasis and Ideology.” Word & Image 7.4 (1991): 301–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonstegard, Adam. “Discreetly Depicting ‘an Outrage’: Graphic Illustration and ‘Daisy Miller’s Reputation.” Henry James Review 29, no. 1 (Winter 2008): 65–79. Project Muse.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, Leo. “‘Ode on a Grecian Urn,’ or Content vs. Metagrammar.” Comparative Literature 7, no. 3 (Summer 1955): 203–225. JSTOR.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thackeray, W.M. “Picture Gossip: In a Letter From Michael Angelo Titmarsh.” In The Complete Works of W.M. Thackeray, 247–270 New York: Riverdale Press, 1905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tintner, Adeline R. The Museum World of Henry James. Ann Arbor: UMI, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Peter. “Introduction: Ekphrasis, Iconotexts, and Intermediality—the State(s) of the Art(s).” In Icons—Texts—Iconotexts: Essays on Ekphrasis and Intermediality, 1–40. Tubingen, DEU: Walter de Gruyter, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, Robert K. “Bulkington, J.M.W. Turner, and ‘The Lee Shore.” Savage Eye: Melville and the Visual Arts, edited by Christopher Sten, 55–76. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Gary. Who Censored Roger Rabbit? New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yacobi, Tamar. “The Ekphrastic Model: Forms and Functions.” In Pictures Into Words: Theoretical and Descriptive Approaches to Ekphrasis, edited by Valerie Robillard and Els Jongeneel, 21–34. Amsterdam: VU University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Newell, K. (2017). “All Text is Lost”: Ekphrastic Reading. In: Expanding Adaptation Networks. Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56712-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics