Skip to main content

Imagining the Unimaginable: Illustration as Gateway

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture ((PSADVC))

Abstract

Illustration, I argue in this chapter, contributes to a given work’s adaptation network by establishing distinctive iconography and by distilling a work to representative scenes, moments, and elements. The aspects of a prose work that illustrators depict (and how they do so) correspond to those similarly reinforced in other illustrated editions as well as in film adaptations. Looking to several sets of illustrations of Henry James’s novellas Daisy Miller and Washington Square and Robert Louis Stevenson’s The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, I consider how similarities in content and tone among the sets suggest a consensus on what “counts” in the work and point to the reiterative process by which the cultural knowledge and memory of a particular work is constructed. This chapter examines some ways in which illustrations in illustrated novels are coded to elicit particular readings that can impact readers’ interpretations of a work by resolving ambiguities or visualizing aspects absent from the prose narrative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I have explored these ideas elsewhere: see Newell, “‘You don’t know about me without you have read a book’: Authenticity in Adaptations of Adventures of Huckleberry Finn,” Literature/Film Quarterly 41.4 (2013): 303–16; “Illustration, Adaptation and the Development of Frankenstein’s Visual Lexicon,” in Adapting Frankenstein: The Monster’s Eternal Lives in Popular Culture, edited by Dennis Cutchins and Dennis Perry (Manchester University Press, Forthcoming); “Adaptation and Illustration: A Cross-Disciplinary Approach,” in Oxford Handbook of Adaptation Studies, edited by Thomas Leitch (Oxford University Press, Forthcoming); and “What We Talk About When We Talk About Adaptation” (PhD diss., University of Delaware, 2006), 1–50.

  2. 2.

    Several writers provide comprehensive overviews of this tendency; see Mitchell (1986) and Elliott (2003), particularly Chapters 1 and 2, which offer a digest of dominant trends of theorizing words and images in interart discourse.

  3. 3.

    Du Maurier’s illustrations first appeared in The Cornhill Magazine (June–November, 1880).

  4. 4.

    Adam Sonstegard also addresses Daisy’s absence from McVickar’s illustrations, but his assessment of the effect differs from my own. He finds that the combination of James’s “tutelarly narration” and McVickar’s “exclusive illustrations gently compel readers to side with” characters that embody conservative social mores and “not with subversives” like Daisy Miller, “Discreetly Depicting ‘an Outrage’: Graphic Illustration and ‘Daisy Miller’’s Reputation,” Henry James Review 29, no. 1 (Winter 2008): 77.

  5. 5.

    McVickar’s 1905 novel, Reptiles, also includes numerous moments of etiquette breaches, which suggests that he sought to further interrogate Daisy Miller’s themes of control and social- and self-policing. With the exception of protagonist Irene North, McVickar’s female characters are, like Daisy, non-conforming, yet, unlike Daisy, they are highly calculating. The contrast between their innocent appearance and covert transgressions of etiquette and Daisy’s transgressive appearance and covert innocence indicates McVickar’s interest in social lines and distinctions between public and private etiquette, as does the advice he offers in his mock etiquette manual Matrimonial Advice (New York: Geo. M. Allen Company, 1893).

  6. 6.

    Charles King comments, “What is remarkable about Stevenson’s central plot premise is that it allows any number of variant themes to be constructed on its basic framework,” “Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde: A Filmography,” Journal of Popular Film and Television 25, no. 1 (1997): 11. The same is true of Hyde. The ambiguity of Stevenson’s characterization allows for any number of variant characteristics to be grafted onto his basic armature.

References

  • Alpers, Svetlana. The Art of Describing: Dutch Art in the Seventeenth Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, Roland. Image—Music—Text. Translated by Stephen Heath. New York: Hill and Wang, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congdon, Charles T. “Over-Illustration.” North American Review 139 (1884): 480–491. JSTOR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crain, Patricia. Story of A: The Alphabetization of America from The New England Primer to The Scarlet Letter. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, David. “Framing the ‘Sketch’: Bogdanovich’s Daisy Miller.” In Henry James on Stage and Screen, edited by John R. Bradley, 127–142. New York: Palgrave, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daisy Miller. Directed by Peter Bogdanovich. Paramount, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danahay, Martin. “Richard Mansfield, Jekyll and Hyde and the History of Special Effects.” Nineteenth Century Theatre and Film 39, no. 2 (Winter 2012): 54–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Written by Thomas Russell Sullivan. 1887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Directed by Lucius Henderson. Thanhouser, 1912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Directed by John S. Robertson. Paramount/Artcraft, 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Directed by Rouben Mamoulian. Paramount, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Directed by Victor Fleming. MGM, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, Kamilla. Rethinking the Novel/Film Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Judith L. “Image versus Text in the Illustrated Novels of William Makepeace Thackeray.” In Victorian Literature and the Victorian Visual Imagination, edited by Carol T. Christ and John O. Jordan, 60–87. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Gateway, n. 1.” OED Online. Oxford University Press, June 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germanà, Monica. “Becoming Hyde: Excess, Pleasure and Cloning.” Gothic Studies 13, no. 2 (November 2011): 98–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Nelson. Languages of Art. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimly, Gris. Gris Grimly’s Frankenstein, or The Modern Prometheus / assembled from the original text by Mary Shelley in three volumes. New York: Balzer + Bray, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Heiress. Directed by William Wyler. Paramount, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodnett, Edward. Image & Text: Studies in the Illustration of English Literature. Aldershot: Scolar, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne, Philip, ed. Henry James: A Life in Letters. New York: Penguin, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheon, Linda. A Theory of Adaptation. New York: Routledge, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Henry. Daisy Miller and An International Episode. Illustrated by H.W. McVickar. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1892.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Daisy Miller: A Study. Illustrated by Gustave Nebel. New York: Heritage Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Daisy Miller. N.p.: Westvaco, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, ed. “Preface to The Golden Bowl.” In Art of the Novel: Critical Prefaces, 327–348. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Washington Square. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1880.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Washington Square. Illustrated by Lynton Lamb. London: The Folio Society, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Washington Square. Illustrated by Lawrence Beall Smith. New York: Heritage Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Washington Square. New York: Penguin, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Washington Square. Illustrated by George du Maurier. New York: Book-of-the-Month Club, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Stephen. Introduction to Frankenstein, by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley, Illustrated by Bernie Wrightson. 6–9. New York: Marvel, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooistra, Lorraine Janzen. The Artist as Critic: Bitextuality in Fin-de-Siècle Illustrated Books. Aldershot: Scolar, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim. Laocoön: An Essay Upon the Limits of Painting and Poetry [1766]. Translated by Ellen Frothingham. Boston: Roberts Brothers, 1874.

    Google Scholar 

  • Male, Alan. Illustration: A Theoretical & Contextual Perspective. Lausanne: AVA, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormack, Peggy. “Reexamining Bogdanovich’s Daisy Miller.” In Henry James Goes to the Movies, edited by Susan M. Griffin, 34–59. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, Brian. Novel to Film: An Introduction to the Theory of Adaptation. Oxford: Clarendon, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • McVickar, H.W. Society: The Greatest Show On Earth: Society. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Hillis, J. Illustration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W.J.T. Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Picture Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nodelman, Perry. Words About Pictures: The Narrative Art of Children’s Picture Books. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, Joyce Carol. Foreword to The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, by Robert Louis Stevenson. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeters, Heidi. “Multimodality and Its Modes in Novelization.” Image & Narrative 11, no. 1 (2010): 118–129. http://www.imageandnarrative.be/index.php/imagenarrative/article/view/59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skilton, David. “The Relation between Illustration and Text in the Victorian Novel: A New Perspective.” In Word and Visual Imagination: Studies in the Interaction of English Literature and the Visual Arts, edited by Karl Josef Höltgen, Peter M. Daly, and Wolfgang Lottes, 303–325. Erlangen: Universitätsbund Erlangen-Nürnberg, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steig, Michael. Dickens and Phiz. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, Robert Louis. [The] Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Illustrated by Edmund Sullivan. London: Macmillan, 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [The] Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Illustrated by W. A. Dwiggins. New York: Random House, 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [The] Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Illustrated by S. G. Hulme Beaman. London: Bodley Head, 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [The] Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Illustrated by Edward A. Wilson. Norwalk: Heritage Press, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [The] Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Illustrated by Barry Moser. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [The Strange Case of] Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde: A Graphic Novel. Illustrated and adapted by Lorenzo Mattotti and Jerry Kramsky. New York: NBM, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Edited by Katherine Linehan. New York: W. W. Norton, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [The] Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Illustrated by Cam Kennedy and adapted by Alan Grant. Waverley: Waverley Books, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [The Strange Case of ] Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde: A Graphic Novel. Illustrated and adapted by Andrzej Klimowksi and Danusia Schejbal. New York: Sterling, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Julia. Pictorial Victorians: The Inscription of Values in Word and Image. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington Square. Directed by Agnieska Holland. Alchemy Filmworks, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte, Stephen.. “Context, Text, Intertext: Toward a Constructivist Semiotic of Writing.” Written Communication 9 (1992): 237–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrightson, Berni[e], Illustrator. Frankenstein, by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley. York: Marvel, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Newell, K. (2017). Imagining the Unimaginable: Illustration as Gateway. In: Expanding Adaptation Networks. Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56712-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics