Skip to main content

Ethical Perspectives on Corporate Governance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Corporate Governance in Africa
  • 801 Accesses

Abstract

The motivation for identifying and using ethical perspectives in decision-making regarding corporate governance has been growing in importance over the last 25 years. In the UK for example there have been four important and influential reports termed Corporate Governance Codes published in the 1990s: Cadbury Report (1992), Greenbury Committee (1995), Hampel Committee Report (1998) and Turnbull Committee Report (1999) (Letza 2015, p. 190). Indeed, these reports laid the foundations of corporate governance for the UK as well as other developed and developing economies. Following the collapse of Enron and WorldCom in 2001, corporate governance gained a much higher profile and was further developed through the Myners Report (2001), Derek Higgs Report (2003), Smith Report (2003), Myners Review (2004), Walker Review (2009) and a revised Combined Code (2012) (ibid.). During the twenty-first century we have witnessed a growing number of research projects and literature on both the general areas of corporate governance and different mechanisms, including directors’ remuneration, accountability, non-executive directors (NEDs) and audit committees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy, 33, 1–19. (Reprinted in Ethics, pp. 186–210, by J. Thomson & G. Dworkin (Eds.), 1968, New York: Harper & Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T., & Bowie, N. (1997). Ethical theory and business practice. In T. Beauchamp & N. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, N. (1991). Business ethics as a discipline: The search for legitimacy. In R. Freeman (Ed.), Business ethics: The state of the art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, N. (1997). New directions in corporate social responsibility. In T. Beauchamp & N. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, R. (2000). Enlightenment. In R. Burns & H. Raymond-Pickard (Eds.), Philosophies of history. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadbury Report. (1992). The Cadbury Committee report. European Corporate Governance Institute. http://www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/cadbury.pdf_br

  • Cargile, J. (1998). ‘On Consequentialism’ Ethical Theory 2: Theories about how we should live. In J. Rachels (Ed.), Oxford readings in philosophy (pp. 64–75). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chryssides, G. D., & Kaler, J. H. (1993). An introduction to business ethics. London: International Thomson Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Combined Code. (2012). Compliance with the UK Corporate Governance Code. UK: Financial Services Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, N. (1980). The priority of avoiding harm. In B. Steinbock (Ed.), Killing and letting die (pp. 172–214). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derek Higgs Report. (2003). Review of the role and effectiveness of Non-executive Directors (NEDs) and their responsibilities in corporate governance practice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dienhart, W. J. (2000). Business, institutions, and ethics: A text with cases and readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donagan, A. (1977). The theory of morality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The Stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, A. A., & Cavana, R. Y. (2003). Stakeholder analysis for systems thinking and modelling. School of Business and Public Management, Victoria University of Wellington: New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, A. A., Cavana, R. Y., & Jackson, L. S. (2000). Linking stakeholder literature and system dynamics: Opportunities for research (pp. 174–179). Proceedings of the International Conference on Systems Thinking in Management, Geelong, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fera, N. (1997). Using shareholder value to evaluate strategic choices. Management Accounting (USA), 79, 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, C. (1978). Right and Wrong. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenbury Committee. (1995). Directors’ Remuneration: Final Report of a Study Group on Directors’ Remuneration. July 1995 CBI UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampel Committee Report. (1998). Corporate Governance Code UK for the DTI. London. http://www.dti.gov.uk

  • Kant, I. (1973). Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (N. K. Smith, Trans.). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1785/1997). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (M. Gregor, Ed., p. 31). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1995). Political writings. In H. Reiss (Ed.), Cambridge texts in history of political thought (H. B. Nisbet, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (2000). Progress in history. In R. Burns & H. Raymond-Pickard (Eds.), Philosophies of history. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M., & Wempe, J. (2002). The balanced company: A theory of corporate integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Machiavelli, N. (1980). The discourses. Pelican Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machiavelli, N. (1986). The prince (Vol. XV, p. 91). Harmondswork: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, C. E. (1998). The Stakeholder Corporation; An Article in Volume 7, No. 1 (January), 30–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, S. R. (1998). The dynamics of shareholder value. Lechlade: Mars Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myners’ Report. (2001). Myners Report on Institutional Investment. London: HM Treasury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myners Review. (2004). Myners principles for institutional investment decision-making: review of progress. UK: HM Treasury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nwanji, T. I., & Howell, E. K. (2004). Ethical perspectives on corporate governance: Developing substantive theory. UK: Earlybrave Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nwanji, T.I., & Howell, K. E. (2005). The stakeholder theory in the modern global business environment. International Journal of Applied Institutional Governance, 1(1), 1–12. www.managementjournals.com.

  • Nwanji, T. I., & Howell, K. E. (2007). Shareholdership versus stakeholdership. Journal of Corporate Ownership and Control, 5(1), 9–23. ISSN: 1727–9232.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2004). OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/social/poverty/28658158.pdf_br

  • OECD. (1999). Corporate governance principles: OECD—Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Steering Group on Corporate Governance. www.cecd.com

  • Oman, C., Fries, S., & Buiter, W. (2003). OECD report on corporate governance in developing, transition and emerging–market economies. http://www.oecd.org/dev

  • Parkinson, J. E. (1994). Corporate power and responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R. (2003). Stakeholder theory and organisational ethics (p. 16). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler. http://managementjournals.com/ig/

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarbanes-Oxley Act. (2002, October 16). The US influence, supplement: New York Stock Exchange and NASDAQ proposed listed company corporate governance rules. Governance Rules.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, S. (1982). The rejection of consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherwin, D. (1983). The Ethical Roots of Business System. Harvard Business Review Harvard Business School (November-December).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (1993). A companion to ethics. In Blackwell companions to philosophy: Blackwell reference. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (1998). Practical ethics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith Report. (2003). Audit Committees Combined Code Guidance. A Report and Proposed Guidance by an FRC Appointed Group. Financial Reporting Council. Retrieved From (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Review_of_the_role_and_effectiveness_of_non-executive_directors_br) (www.frc.org.uk/publication).

  • Solomon, J. (2004). Corporate governance and accountability. Chichester: John Wiley. http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/corporate-governance-and-accountability-jill-solomon/1119390211?ean=9780470843659_br

  • Ticker, R. I. (1984). Corporate governance: Practices, procedures and powers in Turnbull Report (2005), Internal control and risk management: Developing roles of internal audit. http://en.wikipediaorg/wiki/Review_of_the_role_and_effectiveness_of_non-executive_directors_br

  • Turnbull Committee Report. (1999). The Internal Control: Guidance for Directors on the Combined Code. The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, ICAEW: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker Review. (2009). Review of UK Corporate Governance in the Banking Industry. UK: HM Treasury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. In O. Williams & T. Bottomore (Eds.), Dictionary of twentieth-century social thought (pp. 202–204). London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nwanji, T.I. (2016). Ethical Perspectives on Corporate Governance. In: Howell, K., Sorour, M. (eds) Corporate Governance in Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56700-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics