Skip to main content

Introduction: Notions of Governance, Social Contracts and Ethical Perspectives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 785 Accesses

Abstract

This text provides an original opportunity to identify and assess implementation and ethical issues relating to corporate governance in Africa. Through specific case studies regarding corporate governance in individual African states and relationships with generic determinants, advice and direction from the international community, this text provides an ethical assessment of issues regarding globalization as an imposition and the necessity of developing countries to adhere to external governance mechanisms. In addition, through the case studies the text will illustrate what may be considered necessary transformations within specific states if governance procedures are to be transparent and ethical so as to facilitate trust, confidence and inward investment. There is recognition that corporate governance contributes to sustainable economic success as well as enhanced credibility and corporate responsibility (Armstrong 2003); each a necessary variable when attracting funding from both regional and foreign investors. ‘Good’ corporate governance practices are also perceived as means of deterring unethical and corrupt practices which may undermine African capability and credibility in the international domain. ‘Good’ corporate governance may also ensure market discipline and transparency (Armstrong 2003). Indeed, ‘standardization of corporate governance … across many different countries may … seem like a sound approach’ (Letza 2015, p. 191). However, because of cultural and historical differences such an approach has largely been resisted. That said, it is not unusual for developing and ‘transition economies to adopt with little modification the established codes and regulations of developed countries’ (ibid). Indeed, local cultures and traditions exist in individual countries and this text identifies relationships between universal and relativist perspectives of corporate governance in Africa. In addition, rationales for acting through self-interest (egoism) and/or the common interest (altruism) underpin the ways agents behave when dealing with moral dilemmas and regulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2003). The cross national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 447–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardalan, K. (2007). Governance: A paradimatic look. International Journal of Social Economics, 32(2), 506–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (2001). Nicomachean ethics. In R. McKeon (Ed.), The basic works of Aristotle. Toronto: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, P. (2003). Status report on corporate governance reform in Africa. Johannesburg: Pan-African Consultative Forum on Corporate Governance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baier, K. (1993). Egoism. In P. Singer (Ed.), A companion to ethics (pp. 197–204). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (1789). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. In M. Warnock (Ed.), Utilitarianism (pp. 33–77). Glasgow: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevir, M. (2009). Key concepts in Governance. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boadu, M. (2013). Ethical dimensions of corporate governance in Ghana: Building a theoretical perspective. PhD Thesis, University of Plymouth Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. (1986). Modern political philosophy: Theories of the just society. Middlesex: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Cadbury Report. (1992). http://www.egci.org

  • The Combined Code on Corporate Governance UK. (1999). The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI). http://www.egci.org

  • Cranston, M. (1986). John Locke and government by consent. In D. Thomson (Ed.), Political ideas (pp. 53–80). Middlesex: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diggs, B. J. (1982). Utilitarianism and contractarianism. In H. B. Miller & W. H. Williams (Eds.), The limits of utilitarianism (pp. 101–114). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evan, W. M., & Freeman, R. E. (1993). A stakeholder theory of modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In T. Beauchamp & N. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business. The Modern Corporation: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N., & Choo, J. (2005). Law and corporate governance. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1, 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flinstead, N., & Freeland, R. (1995). Theoretical and comparative perspectives on corporate organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 21–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster, W., & Brown, J. (2013). CSR and stakeholder theory: A tale of Adam Smith. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 301–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fried, C. (1978). Right and wrong. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970, September 30). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Time Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M., & Friedman, R. (1980). Freedom to choose. London: Secker & Warburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. K. (1979). The new industrial state. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. K. (1994). The Good Society considered: The economic dimension. Annual Lecture for the Journal of Law and Society, Cardiff Law School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1998). The third way: The renewal of social democracy. Polity. Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1999). Runaway world. UK: Profile Books. Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • The Greenbury Report. (1995). http://www.egci.org

  • Habermas, J. (2006). Euroskeptism, market Europe, or a Europe of world citizens. In C. Cronin & M. Pensky (Ed. & Trans.), Time of transition (pp. 73–88). Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Hampel Report. (1998). http://www.egci.org

  • Hampsher-Monk, I. (1992). A history of modern political thought. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, J. (1998). Contract and consent. In R. E. Goodwin & P. Pettit (Eds.), A companion to contemporary political philosophy (pp. 379–93). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. M. (1965). Freedom and reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C., & Marsh, D. (Eds.). (2000). Demystifying globalization. Polsis, University of Birmingham UK. Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. D., McGrew, A. G., Goldblatt, D., & Perraton, J. (Eds.). (1999). Global transformations. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herodotus. (440BC/2013). Histories (P. Cartledge, Ed.). London: Penguin Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P. (2006). Democracy and governance. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance: Authority, steering and democracy (pp. 13–35). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1651/1990). Leviathan (R. Tuck, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, K. E., & Letza, S. (2000). Virtue, virtu, categorical imperative and the civic constitution: Defining corporate governance. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 11(1), 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1748/1971). Of the original contract. In E. Barker (Ed.), Social contract: Essays by Locke, Hume and Rousseau. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, W. (1995). The state we’re in. London: Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, W. (1997). The state to come. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, A. U. (2013). Investigating the effects of corporate governce of banks in Nigeria: A grounded theory approach. PhD Thesis, University of Plymouth Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1784/1995). Idea for a universal history with a cosmopolitan purpose. In: H. Reiss (Ed.), Political writings (pp. 41–53). Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1785/1987). Fundamental principles of the metaphysic of morals. New York: Prometheus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1795/1995). Perpetual peace a philosophical sketch. In H. Reiss (Ed.), Political writings (pp. 93–130). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J., & Silberston, A. (1995). Corporate governance. National Institute Economic Review, 84, 84–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkbride, J., Letza, S., & Sun, X. (2005). Corporate governance: Towards a theory of regulatory shift. European Journal of Law and Economics, 20(1), 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuttner, R. (2001). The role of governments in the global economy. In W. Hutton & A. Giddens (Eds.), On the edge: Living with global capitalism (pp. 130–146). London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letza, S. (2015). Corporate governance: Towards a new foundation for both developed and transition economies. In J. Holscher & T. Horst (Eds.), Palgrave dictionary of emerging markets and transition economies. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letza, S., Kirkbride, J., Sun, X., & Smallman, C. (2008). Corporate governance theorising: Limits, Critics and Alternatives. International Journal of Law and Management, 50(1), 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letza, S., & Sun, X. (2002). Corporate governance: Paradigms, dilemmas and beyond. Poznan University of Economics Review, 2(1), 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letza, S., Sun, X., & Kirkbride, J. (2004). Shareholding versus stakeholding: A critical review of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(3), 242–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1690/1971). An essay concerning the true original extent and end of civil government. In E. Barker (Ed.), Social contract: Essays by Locke, Hume and Rousseau. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, C. Kirkbride, J., & Bryde, D. (2007). From stakeholders to institutions: The changing face of enterprise governance theory. Management Decision, 45(2), 284–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, M. (1993a). Can’t we make moral judgements? New York: St. Martin’s.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, M. (1993b). The origin of ethics. In P. Singer (Ed.), A companion to ethics (pp. 3–13). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1861). Utilitarianism. In M. Warnock (Ed.), Utilitarianism (pp. 251–321) (1986). Glasgow: Fontana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minogue, K. R. (1986). Thomas Hobbes and the philosophy of absolutism. In D. Thomson (Ed.), Political ideas (pp. 53–66). Middlesex: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1984). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nwanji, I. T. (2006). Ethical implications of corporate governance on banks in Nigeria: A grounded theory approach. PhD Thesis, Anglia Ruskin University Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato (1997). Republic in Plato: complete works. (Ed) Cooper, J. M. 971-1223. Indiana: Hackett Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J. J. (1755/1984). A discourse on inequality (M. Cranston, Ed.). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J. J. (1762/1988). The social contract (M. Cranston, Ed.). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roussouw, G. J. (2005). Business ethics and corporate governance in Africa. Business and Society, 44(1), 94–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2001). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1759/2009). The theory of moral sentiments. Middlesex: Penguin Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1776/1985). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Middlesex: Penguin Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorour, M. K. (2011) An explanation and analysis of the evolving bank corporate governance practices in Egypt: A grounded theory approach. PhD Thesis University of Plymouth Business School, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorour, M. K., & Howell, K. E. (2013). A grounded theory analysis of corporate governance in Egyptian banking. Qualitative Research Journal, 13(3), 289–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. (1976). The successes and failures of Professor Smith. Journal of Political Economy, 84(6), 1199–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1972). Morality: An introduction to ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureacracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zizek, S. (2014). Trouble in paradise: From the end of history to the end of capitalism. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Howell, K.E. (2016). Introduction: Notions of Governance, Social Contracts and Ethical Perspectives. In: Howell, K., Sorour, M. (eds) Corporate Governance in Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56700-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics