Advertisement

Introduction: Notions of Governance, Social Contracts and Ethical Perspectives

Chapter
  • 497 Downloads

Abstract

This text provides an original opportunity to identify and assess implementation and ethical issues relating to corporate governance in Africa. Through specific case studies regarding corporate governance in individual African states and relationships with generic determinants, advice and direction from the international community, this text provides an ethical assessment of issues regarding globalization as an imposition and the necessity of developing countries to adhere to external governance mechanisms. In addition, through the case studies the text will illustrate what may be considered necessary transformations within specific states if governance procedures are to be transparent and ethical so as to facilitate trust, confidence and inward investment. There is recognition that corporate governance contributes to sustainable economic success as well as enhanced credibility and corporate responsibility (Armstrong 2003); each a necessary variable when attracting funding from both regional and foreign investors. ‘Good’ corporate governance practices are also perceived as means of deterring unethical and corrupt practices which may undermine African capability and credibility in the international domain. ‘Good’ corporate governance may also ensure market discipline and transparency (Armstrong 2003). Indeed, ‘standardization of corporate governance … across many different countries may … seem like a sound approach’ (Letza 2015, p. 191). However, because of cultural and historical differences such an approach has largely been resisted. That said, it is not unusual for developing and ‘transition economies to adopt with little modification the established codes and regulations of developed countries’ (ibid). Indeed, local cultures and traditions exist in individual countries and this text identifies relationships between universal and relativist perspectives of corporate governance in Africa. In addition, rationales for acting through self-interest (egoism) and/or the common interest (altruism) underpin the ways agents behave when dealing with moral dilemmas and regulation.

Keywords

Corporate Governance Social Contract Stakeholder Theory Ethical Perspective Invisible Hand 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2003). The cross national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 447–465.Google Scholar
  2. Ardalan, K. (2007). Governance: A paradimatic look. International Journal of Social Economics, 32(2), 506–524.Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle. (2001). Nicomachean ethics. In R. McKeon (Ed.), The basic works of Aristotle. Toronto: Random House.Google Scholar
  4. Armstrong, P. (2003). Status report on corporate governance reform in Africa. Johannesburg: Pan-African Consultative Forum on Corporate Governance.Google Scholar
  5. Baier, K. (1993). Egoism. In P. Singer (Ed.), A companion to ethics (pp. 197–204). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Bentham, J. (1789). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. In M. Warnock (Ed.), Utilitarianism (pp. 33–77). Glasgow: Fontana.Google Scholar
  7. Bevir, M. (2009). Key concepts in Governance. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Boadu, M. (2013). Ethical dimensions of corporate governance in Ghana: Building a theoretical perspective. PhD Thesis, University of Plymouth Business School.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, A. (1986). Modern political philosophy: Theories of the just society. Middlesex: Penguin.Google Scholar
  10. The Cadbury Report. (1992). http://www.egci.org
  11. The Combined Code on Corporate Governance UK. (1999). The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI). http://www.egci.org
  12. Cranston, M. (1986). John Locke and government by consent. In D. Thomson (Ed.), Political ideas (pp. 53–80). Middlesex: Penguin.Google Scholar
  13. Diggs, B. J. (1982). Utilitarianism and contractarianism. In H. B. Miller & W. H. Williams (Eds.), The limits of utilitarianism (pp. 101–114). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  14. Evan, W. M., & Freeman, R. E. (1993). A stakeholder theory of modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In T. Beauchamp & N. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business. The Modern Corporation: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  15. Fligstein, N., & Choo, J. (2005). Law and corporate governance. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1, 61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Flinstead, N., & Freeland, R. (1995). Theoretical and comparative perspectives on corporate organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Forster, W., & Brown, J. (2013). CSR and stakeholder theory: A tale of Adam Smith. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 301–312.Google Scholar
  18. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
  19. Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fried, C. (1978). Right and wrong. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Friedman, M. (1970, September 30). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Time Magazine.Google Scholar
  22. Friedman, M., & Friedman, R. (1980). Freedom to choose. London: Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
  23. Galbraith, J. K. (1979). The new industrial state. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  24. Galbraith, J. K. (1994). The Good Society considered: The economic dimension. Annual Lecture for the Journal of Law and Society, Cardiff Law School.Google Scholar
  25. Giddens, A. (1998). The third way: The renewal of social democracy. Polity. Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  26. Giddens, A. (1999). Runaway world. UK: Profile Books. Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  27. The Greenbury Report. (1995). http://www.egci.org
  28. Habermas, J. (2006). Euroskeptism, market Europe, or a Europe of world citizens. In C. Cronin & M. Pensky (Ed. & Trans.), Time of transition (pp. 73–88). Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  29. The Hampel Report. (1998). http://www.egci.org
  30. Hampsher-Monk, I. (1992). A history of modern political thought. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  31. Hampton, J. (1998). Contract and consent. In R. E. Goodwin & P. Pettit (Eds.), A companion to contemporary political philosophy (pp. 379–93). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  32. Hare, R. M. (1965). Freedom and reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hay, C., & Marsh, D. (Eds.). (2000). Demystifying globalization. Polsis, University of Birmingham UK. Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  34. Held, D. D., McGrew, A. G., Goldblatt, D., & Perraton, J. (Eds.). (1999). Global transformations. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  35. Herodotus. (440BC/2013). Histories (P. Cartledge, Ed.). London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  36. Hirst, P. (2006). Democracy and governance. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance: Authority, steering and democracy (pp. 13–35). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Hobbes, T. (1651/1990). Leviathan (R. Tuck, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Howell, K. E., & Letza, S. (2000). Virtue, virtu, categorical imperative and the civic constitution: Defining corporate governance. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 11(1), 95–100.Google Scholar
  39. Hume, D. (1748/1971). Of the original contract. In E. Barker (Ed.), Social contract: Essays by Locke, Hume and Rousseau. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Hutton, W. (1995). The state we’re in. London: Cape.Google Scholar
  41. Hutton, W. (1997). The state to come. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  42. Ibrahim, A. U. (2013). Investigating the effects of corporate governce of banks in Nigeria: A grounded theory approach. PhD Thesis, University of Plymouth Business School.Google Scholar
  43. Kant, I. (1784/1995). Idea for a universal history with a cosmopolitan purpose. In: H. Reiss (Ed.), Political writings (pp. 41–53). Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Kant, I. (1785/1987). Fundamental principles of the metaphysic of morals. New York: Prometheus.Google Scholar
  45. Kant, I. (1795/1995). Perpetual peace a philosophical sketch. In H. Reiss (Ed.), Political writings (pp. 93–130). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Kay, J., & Silberston, A. (1995). Corporate governance. National Institute Economic Review, 84, 84–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kirkbride, J., Letza, S., & Sun, X. (2005). Corporate governance: Towards a theory of regulatory shift. European Journal of Law and Economics, 20(1), 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kuttner, R. (2001). The role of governments in the global economy. In W. Hutton & A. Giddens (Eds.), On the edge: Living with global capitalism (pp. 130–146). London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  49. Letza, S. (2015). Corporate governance: Towards a new foundation for both developed and transition economies. In J. Holscher & T. Horst (Eds.), Palgrave dictionary of emerging markets and transition economies. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  50. Letza, S., Kirkbride, J., Sun, X., & Smallman, C. (2008). Corporate governance theorising: Limits, Critics and Alternatives. International Journal of Law and Management, 50(1), 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Letza, S., & Sun, X. (2002). Corporate governance: Paradigms, dilemmas and beyond. Poznan University of Economics Review, 2(1), 43–59.Google Scholar
  52. Letza, S., Sun, X., & Kirkbride, J. (2004). Shareholding versus stakeholding: A critical review of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(3), 242–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Locke, J. (1690/1971). An essay concerning the true original extent and end of civil government. In E. Barker (Ed.), Social contract: Essays by Locke, Hume and Rousseau. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Mason, C. Kirkbride, J., & Bryde, D. (2007). From stakeholders to institutions: The changing face of enterprise governance theory. Management Decision, 45(2), 284–301.Google Scholar
  55. Midgley, M. (1993a). Can’t we make moral judgements? New York: St. Martin’s.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Midgley, M. (1993b). The origin of ethics. In P. Singer (Ed.), A companion to ethics (pp. 3–13). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  57. Mill, J. S. (1861). Utilitarianism. In M. Warnock (Ed.), Utilitarianism (pp. 251–321) (1986). Glasgow: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
  58. Minogue, K. R. (1986). Thomas Hobbes and the philosophy of absolutism. In D. Thomson (Ed.), Political ideas (pp. 53–66). Middlesex: Penguin.Google Scholar
  59. North, D. C. (1984). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Nwanji, I. T. (2006). Ethical implications of corporate governance on banks in Nigeria: A grounded theory approach. PhD Thesis, Anglia Ruskin University Business School.Google Scholar
  61. Plato (1997). Republic in Plato: complete works. (Ed) Cooper, J. M. 971-1223. Indiana: Hackett Publishers.Google Scholar
  62. Rousseau, J. J. (1755/1984). A discourse on inequality (M. Cranston, Ed.). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  63. Rousseau, J. J. (1762/1988). The social contract (M. Cranston, Ed.). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  64. Roussouw, G. J. (2005). Business ethics and corporate governance in Africa. Business and Society, 44(1), 94–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sen, A. (2001). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Smith, A. (1759/2009). The theory of moral sentiments. Middlesex: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  67. Smith, A. (1776/1985). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Middlesex: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  68. Sorour, M. K. (2011) An explanation and analysis of the evolving bank corporate governance practices in Egypt: A grounded theory approach. PhD Thesis University of Plymouth Business School, UKGoogle Scholar
  69. Sorour, M. K., & Howell, K. E. (2013). A grounded theory analysis of corporate governance in Egyptian banking. Qualitative Research Journal, 13(3), 289–316.Google Scholar
  70. Stigler, G. (1976). The successes and failures of Professor Smith. Journal of Political Economy, 84(6), 1199–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Williams, B. (1972). Morality: An introduction to ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureacracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  73. Zizek, S. (2014). Trouble in paradise: From the end of history to the end of capitalism. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of ManagementPlymouth UniversityPlymouthUK

Personalised recommendations