Skip to main content

Systemic Risk and the Financial System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Systemic Risk

Abstract

This chapter introduces a common working definition of systemic risk, along the lines of ‘a risk of disruption in the financial system with the potential to have serious negative consequences for the real economy’. It then explores how systemic risk is typically understood by a range of interested parties and how this understanding does not always align with the working definition given above. It also explains why regulators and policymakers typically believe that all types of financial intermediaries, markets and infrastructure may be potentially systemically important to some degree. Two ‘models’ for systemic risk are explored, – the ‘domino’ model and the ‘tsunami’ model, – as are some historical examples of systemic risk events and some overall perspectives on why the financial system might be susceptible to systemic risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Competition & Markets Authority (2016). Retail Banking Market Investigation: Final Report. UK Competition & Markets Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist (2016). WeChat’s World. The Economist, 6 August 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRB (2014c). Is Europe Overbanked? European Systemic Risk Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (2010). Regulation (EU) No 1092/2010. European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (2013a). Capital Requirements Directive, i.e. Directive 2013/36/EU. European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (2013b). Capital Requirements Regulation, i.e. Regulation (EU) No 575/2013. European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, N. (2009). The Ascent of Money. Penguin Books, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF (2016). Global Financial Stability Report, April 2016, Chapter 3: The Insurance Sector – Trends and Systemic Risk Implications. International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriwaczek, P. (2010). Babylon: Mesopotamia and the Birth of Civilization. Atlantic Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, C. (1841). Extraordinary Popular Delusions and The Madness of Crowds. Wordsworth Reference, Ware, Hertfordshire, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • PRA (2012). The PRA’s Approach to Banking Supervision. The Bank of England, Prudential Regulation Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • PwC (2016). PwC Global FinTech Report March 2016: Blurred lines: How FinTech is shaping Financial Services. PwC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarcz, S.L. (2008). Systemic Risk. Duke Law School Legal Studies Research Paper 163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. (2015). Good News – Fintech Could Disrupt Finance. Financial Times.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kemp, M.H. (2017). Systemic Risk and the Financial System. In: Systemic Risk. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56587-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56587-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-56586-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56587-7

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics