Skip to main content

Indigenous Engagement : Three Case Studies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Leadership and the Construction of Environmental Concern

Abstract

In this chapter we examine the relationship between environmental leaders and Indigenous Australians. The World Heritage Convention protects sites of universal natural and cultural values, sometimes in combination. In 2015, it was amended to incorporate references to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). International conventions are always in danger of becoming the handmaidens of their signatory states. When evidence emerges that they have succumbed, it fuels criticism of cosmopolitanism. At the same time, environmental leaders sometimes clash with Indigenous people over efforts to conserve the natural values of traditional lands for the ‘global good’. We ask how international instruments with cosmopolitan ambitions have influenced the discourse and practice of Australian environmentalists attempting to find common ground with Indigenous groups. Drawing on interviews with 25 members of our sample who mentioned Indigenous issues in their interviews, we find the World Heritage Convention and UNDRIP have encouraged a pragmatic cosmopolitan practice among environmentalists, despite continuing intercultural differences in some quarters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Libby Lester .

Profile: Dr Anne Poelina

Profile: Dr Anne Poelina

Madjulla Incorporated

I’m a Nyikina Warrwa Traditional Custodian from Mardoowarra, on the Lower Fitzroy River in the West Kimberley region of Western Australia . My home is Broome , on the state’s northern coast, and although I’m not a Traditional Owner of Broome , my family has lived there for several generations. Until a few years ago, my life was very private. It wasn’t until I realised what was going to be destroyed at Walmadan that I thought I had to show leadership.

Walmadan is the Aboriginal name for James Price Point , which was threatened because the state government and many multinational companies wanted to build a $46 billion LNG processing plant there. It was going to be the biggest LNG precinct in the world. Walmadan is a special place for my family and me, and many other families, both Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal. We visit it and know its beauty, its cultural value and its environmental value. Because I have a health background, I started to think about how the LNG plant would impact not just on the environment but also on the people and our quality of life. I was not going to sit idly by and let this happen. I decided to take a stand for the environmental and cultural values of Walmadan .

We began by trying to think of ways to mobilise people to stand up for the environment and this beautiful place called Walmadan . Aboriginal and Asian families here refer to themselves as the Old Families of Broome . They say they built Broome , love Broome and call Broome home. But there are also non-Aboriginal residents who love Broome and the Kimberley and Walmadan . So we decided to call the movement Families of Broome . That way, we were able to attract Indigenous, Asian and non-Indigenous families, cut across political boundaries, and bring many small interest groups together. We wanted to create a space where families could be informed about the impacts and the strategies of the state government and the corporations so that they would start to feel they had a right to protect Walmadan. Before this, I think the people of Broome had been overcome by a sense of learned helplessness. Once we started having regular meetings, we began to understand that the corporations and government wanted us to feel that way—to feel as if the LNG development was a fait accompli and it would be impossible for us to mobilise individual and collective support to stop it.

One of the things I say to people is that we had to have the war to understand that we really need peace—we had to have the James Price Point scenario to learn that conflict has huge collateral damage for people, relationships and networks in the community. The major learning for me is to try and mobilise a more regional way of working together with all the different stakeholder groups so that we all get access to the information we need to see the true cost of these sorts of developments to our existing livelihoods.

As a Traditional Custodian from the Fitzroy River , I’m sometimes an alternative voice from my own people, because I’m trying to protect that environment from shale oil and gas exploration. I’m not dissenting for the sake of it. I’m dissenting because I’m also a scientist who is informed about the project, and the evidence tells me that I should be worried about its impacts on water, the rest of the environment, and our regional livelihoods. I believe a lot of Aboriginal people don’t have the opportunity to get the information, so they are not making decisions on the basis of free, prior and informed consent.

No one will truly know the collateral damage that mining brings to Aboriginal families, because nobody’s measuring that cost. It’s pitted father against son, brother against brother, sister against mother, sister again sister, mother against daughter. Some of these relationships may never be healed. Aboriginal people like me who do stand up and present a different view are exposed not only to threats but to real violence. In the case of Walmadan, there were many Aboriginal people who were strong proponents. By mobilising so many non-Indigenous people from all over the country, and indeed across the world, to stand up for Walmadan, I was seen to be threatening their opportunity to become very wealthy very quickly.

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tranter, B., Lester, L., McGaurr, L. (2017). Indigenous Engagement : Three Case Studies. In: Leadership and the Construction of Environmental Concern. Palgrave Studies in Media and Environmental Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56584-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics