Advertisement

Locking the Gate on Coal and Gas

  • Bruce Tranter
  • Libby LesterEmail author
  • Lyn McGaurr
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Media and Environmental Communication book series (PSMEC)

Abstract

In this chapter we move out of Australia’s capital cities to the nation’s rural towns and farms to examine a surprising alliance formed in 2010, evocatively called Lock the Gate. Similar to its environmental predecessors, Lock the Gate is grass-roots-based. Yet, unlike earlier elements of the movement, almost 100,000 environmental activists, farmers, Indigenous people and, as contemporary politicians refer to them, ‘mum and dad Australians’, are united in their stance against ‘unsafe coal and gas mining’ (http://www.lockthegate.org.au/about_us). We examine the way the leaders of Lock the Gate constructed environmental issues to attract rural landholders to the alliance in its early years. Although the alliance attempts to prevent the expansion of key causes of anthropogenic climate change, our research findings raise questions about its willingness to publicise global warming as a key environmental issue.

References

  1. Akerlof, K., R. DeBono, P. Berry, A. Leiserowitz, C. Roser-Renouf, K. Clarke, A. Rogaeva, M. Nisbet, M. Weathers, and E. Maibach. 2010. Public Perceptions of Climate Change as a Human Health Risk: Surveys of the United States, Canada and Malta. International Journal of Environmental Research and Health 7: 2559–2606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldassarri, D., and M. Diani. 2007. The Integrative Power of Civic Networks. American Journal of Sociology 113 (3): 735–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benford, R., and D. Snow. 2000. Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braun, D. 1999. Interests or Ideas? An Overview of Ideational Concepts in Public Policy Research. In Public Policy and Political Ideas, ed. D. Braun and A. Busch, 11–29. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  5. Cacciatore, M., D. Scheufele, and S. Iyengar. 2016. The End of Framing as We Know It…and the Future of Media Effects. Mass Communication and Society 19: 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carney, M. 2011. The Gas Rush. Four Corners, transcript, ABC, 21 February.Google Scholar
  7. Dalby Herald. 2010. Our Say, 26 November, p. 6.Google Scholar
  8. Di Gregorio, M. 2012. Networking in Environmental Movement Organisation Coalitions: Interest, Values or Discourse? Environmental Politics 21 (1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diani, M. 1992. The Concept of Social Movement. The Sociological Review 40: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Entman, R. 1993. Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frackman. 2015. DVD, Freshwater Productions Pty Ltd, Smith & Nasht Pty Ltd, Aquarium Productions, Screen Queensland Pty Ltd, ScreenWest Inc., GetUp Limited and Screen Australia. Directed by R. Todd.Google Scholar
  12. Fractured Country: An Unconventional Invasion. 2013. Video, Lock the Gate Alliance, Australia, Directed by B. Shoebridge. http://www.lockthegate.org.au/our_films. Viewed 30 December 2016.
  13. Gasfield Free Northern Rivers. 2013. Drew Hutton’s Speech and Arrest, Doubtful Creek NSW February 2013, video. http://csgfreenorthernrivers.org/about-the-csg-free-campaign/. Viewed 26 March 2017.
  14. Gasfield Free Northern Rivers. 2017. About the Gasfield Free Campaign. http://csgfreenorthernrivers.org/about-the-csg-free-campaign/. Viewed 26 March 2017.
  15. Hajer, M. 1993. Discourse Coalitions and the Institutionalization of Practice: The Case of Acid Rain in Britain. In The Argumentative Turn in Policy Planning and Analysis, ed. F. Fischer and J. Forester, 43–76. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hajer, M. 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernisation and the Policy Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hilgartner, S., and C. Bosk. 1988. The Rise and Fall of Social Problem: A Public Arenas Model. American Journal of Sociology 94 (1): 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hutton, D. 2012. Lessons from the Lock the Gate movement. Social Alternatives 31 (1): 15–19.Google Scholar
  19. Hutton, D. 2013. Mining: The Queensland Way, ebook. QLD: At A Glance Pty Ltd.Google Scholar
  20. Lock the Gate. n.d.a. About Us. http://www.lockthegate.org.au/about_us. Viewed 29 March 2017.
  21. Lock the Gate. n.d.b. Tips to get active. http://www.lockthegate.org.au/tips_to_get_active. Viewed 29 March 2017.
  22. Manning, P. 2012. What the Frack? Everything You Need to Know About Coal Seam Gas. Sydney: NewSouth Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. McGaurr, L., and L. Lester. 2009. Complementary Problems, Competing Risks: Climate Change, Nuclear Energy and The Australian. In Climate Change and the Media, ed. T. Boyce and J. Lewis, 174–185. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Morris, A., and S. Staggenborg. 2004. Leadership in Social Movements. In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, ed. D. Snow, S. Soule, and H. Kriesi, 171–196. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Pickerill, J. 2008. From Wilderness to WildCountry: The Power of Language in Environmental Campaigns in Australia. Environmental Politics 17 (1): 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rootes, C. 1997. Environmental Movements and Green Parties in Western and Eastern Europe. In The International Handbook of Environmental Sociology, ed. M. Redclift and G. Woodgate, 319–348. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. Rootes, C. 2004. Environmental Movements. In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, ed. D. Snow, S. Soule, and H. Kriesi, 608–640. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Routledge, P. 2011. Translocal Climate Justice Solidarities. In Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society, ed. J. Dryzek and D. Schlosberg, 385–398. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Saunders, C. 2008. Double-Edged Swords? Collective Identity and Solidarity in the Environment Movement. The British Journal of Sociology 59 (2): 227–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Scannell, L., and R. Gifford. 2013. Personally Relevant Climate Change: The Role of Place Attachment and Local Versus Global Message Framing in Engagement. Environment and Behavior 45 (1): 60–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Singleton Argus. 2010. Coal Seam Gas, 17 December.Google Scholar
  32. Snow, D., and D. McAdam. 1999. Identity Work Processes in the Context of Social Movements: Clarifying the Identity/Movement Nexus. In Self, Identity and Social Movements, ed. S. Stryker, T. Owens, and R. White, 41–67. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  33. Soutphommasane, T. 2009. Reclaiming Patriotism: Nation-Building for Australian Progressives. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tranter, B. and L. Lester. 2017. Climate Patriots? Concern Over Climate Change and Other Environmental Issues in Australia. Public Understanding of Science, 26 (6): 738–752. doi: 10.1177/0963662515618553.
  35. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1981. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science 211 (4481): 453–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Undermining Australia: Coal vs Communities. 2013. Video, Lock the Gate Alliance, Directed by D. Lowe. http://www.lockthegate.org.au/our_films. Viewed 30 Dec 2016.
  37. Wibeck, V. 2013. Enhancing Learning, Communication and Public Engagement About Climate Change—Some Lessons From Recent Literature. Environmental Education Research 20 (3): 387–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TasmaniaHobartAustralia
  2. 2.University of TasmaniaHobartAustralia
  3. 3.University of TasmaniaHobartAustralia

Personalised recommendations