Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Leading for Innovation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Capital and Innovation

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Global Human Capital Management ((PALGHCM))

Abstract

Innovation is an enabler as well as a necessity of globalization. Strides in communication technologies are making it easier to have teams that operate globally, and rapid globalization makes innovation a necessity if organizations are to keep their competitive advantage. The challenge of leading for innovation needs to be understood at an individual level, to allow leaders to adjust their approach when the individual factors or the situational demands vary from location to location. In this chapter, we try to unify two streams of research in individual innovation; one that places emphasis on the motivational component of leadership and another that emphasizes leadership’s role in influencing behaviour. We build testable propositions about the approaches that leaders can take to foster innovation when teams comprise of diverse individuals in various situations. The broad framework and some specific examples are given and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 123–167). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996a). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996b). Creativity and innovation in organizations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E. A., Moneta, G. B., & Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N., de Drew, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2004). The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 147–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N., PotoÄŤnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations a state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4): 696–717, 829–830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2010). Managing innovation paradoxes: Ambidexterity lessons from leading product design companies. Long Range Planning, 43(1), 104–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, J. A., Arad, S., Rhoades, J. A., & Drasgow, F. (2000). The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(3), 249–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atwater, L., & Carmeli, A. (2009). Leadermember exchange, feelings of energy, and involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 264–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axtell, C. M., Holman, D. J., Unsworth, K. L., Wall, T. D., Waterson, P. E., et al. (2000). Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 265–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., Tims, M., & Derks, D. (2012). Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement. Human Relations, 65(10), 1359–1378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., & Gibson, C. (2004). Building ambidexterity into an organization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(4), 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bledow, R., Frese, M., Anderson, N., Erez, M., & Farr, J. (2009a). A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2(3), 305–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bledow, R., Frese, M., Anderson, N., Erez, M., & Farr, J. (2009b). Extending and refining the dialectic perspective on innovation: There is nothing as practical as a good theory; nothing as theoretical as a good practice. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2(3), 363–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buijs, J. (2007). Innovation leaders should be controlled schizophrenics. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(2), 203–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, C. L., Mumford, M. D., Barrett, J. D., & Vessey, W. B. (2009). Examining the leaders of creative efforts: What do they do, and what do they think about? Creativity and Innovation Management, 18(4), 256–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CaniĂ«ls, M. C., De Stobbeleir, K., & De Clippeleer, I. (2014). The antecedents of creativity revisited: A process perspective. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(2), 96–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli, A., & Halevi, M. Y. (2009). How top management team behavioral integration and behavioral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambidexterity. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 207–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ÄŚerne, M., JakliÄŤ, M., & Ĺ kerlavaj, M. (2013). Authentic leadership, creativity, and innovation: A multilevel perspective. Leadership, 9(1), 63–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, K. Y. (2010). Spillover effects of FDI via exports on innovation performance of China’s high-technology industries. Journal of Contemporary China, 19(65), 541–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, J. P., & Hartog, D. N. D. (2007). How leaders influence employees’ innovative behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denison, D. R., Hooijberg, R., & Quinn, R. E. (1995). Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization Science, 6(5), 524–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Wellman, N., & Humphrey, S. E. (2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 7–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dess, G. G., & Picken, J. C. (2000). Changing roles: Leadership in the 21st century. Organizational Dynamics, 28(3), 18–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EisenbeiĂź, S. A., & Boerner, S. (2010). Transformational leadership and R&D innovation: Taking a curvilinear approach. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(4), 364–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenbeiss, S. A., van Knippenberg, D., & Boerner, S. (2008). Transformational leadership and team innovation: Integrating team climate principles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1438–1446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall, G., & Ryhammar, L. (1999). The creative climate: Its determinants and effects at a Swedish University. Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), 303–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feist, G. J., & Gorman, M. E. (1998). The psychology of science: Review and integration of a nascent discipline. Review of General Psychology, 2(1), 3–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1112–1142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, W., & Sparks, T. (2012). A convergence/divergence perspective of leadership competencies managers believe are most important for success in organizations: A cross-cultural multilevel analysis of 40 countries. Journal of Business & Psychology, 27(1), 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, P. L., Hu, X., Wei, F., Tetrick, L. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2013). Positive affectivity neutralizes transformational leadership’s influence on creative performance and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(8), 1061–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, Y., Huang, J.-C., & Farh, J.-l. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 765–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 90–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, D., & Felfe, J. (2013). Moderators of the relationship between leadership style and employee creativity: The role of task novelty and personal initiative. Creativity Research Journal, 25(2), 172–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, K. (1995). Goal conflict and originality of thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 8(3), 285–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, O., & Van Yperen, N. W. (2004). Employees’ goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 368–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaussi, K. S., & Dionne, S. D. (2003). Leading for creativity: The role of unconventional leader behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(45), 475–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha, S. K., & Krishnan, R. T. (2013). Local innovation: The key to globalisation. IIMB Management Review, 25(4), 249–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Josephine, N. D. (2014). Implication of globalization on organization culture, Kenyan experience. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4(4), 285–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Ilies, R. (2004). The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahai, S. S., Sosik, J. J., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Effects of leadership style, anonymity, and rewards on creativity-relevant processes and outcomes in an electronic meeting system context. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(45), 499–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kark, R. (2011). Games managers play: Play as a form of leadership development. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(3), 507–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, R. T. (1989). A test of the path-goal theory of leadership with need for clarity as a moderator in research and development organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(2), 208–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, S., & Jermier, J. M. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 22(3), 375–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kesting, P., Ulhøi, J. P., Song, L. J., & Niu, H. (2016). The impact of leadership styles on innovation—A review. Journal of Innovation Management, 3(4), 22–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, N. (1992). Modelling the innovation process: An empirical comparison of approaches. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65(2), 89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainemelis, C., Kark, R., & Epitropaki, O. (2015). Creative leadership: A multi-context conceptualization. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 393–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelis, B., Stegmaier, R., & Sonntag, K. (2010). Shedding light on followers’ innovation implementation behavior: The role of transformational leadership, commitment to change, and climate for initiative. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(4), 408–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (2007). Mintzberg on management. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mom, T. J. M., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2007). Investigating managers’ exploration and exploitation activities: The influence of top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal knowledge inflows. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 910–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D. (2000). Managing creative people: Strategies and tactics for innovation. Human Resource Management Review, 10(3), 313–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., & Licuanan, B. (2004). Leading for innovation: Conclusions, issues, and directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 163–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., Gibson, C., Giorgini, V., & Mecca, J. (2014). Leading for creativity: People, products, and systems. In D. V. Day (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations (pp. 754–779). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 705–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NĂĽbold, A., Muck, P. M., & Maier, G. W. (2013). A new substitute for leadership? Followers’ state core self-evaluations. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S., & Pluntke, F. (2006). Routinization, work characteristics and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3), 257–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, R. N., & Marion, R. (2009). Contextual leadership, transformational leadership and the performance of international innovation seeking alliances. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 191–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palanski, M. E., & Vogelgesang, G. R. (2011). Virtuous creativity: The effects of leader behavioural integrity on follower creative thinking and risk taking. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences de L’Administration, 28(3), 259–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieterse, A. N., van Knippenberg, D., Schippers, M., & Stam, D. (2010). Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 609–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. B. (1985). Managing innovation: Controlled chaos. Harvard Business Review, 63(3), 73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosing, K. (2011). Dynamics of the innovation process: The linear-recursive model of innovation and the implications for leadership and self-regulation. PhD, Leuphana University, Luneburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 956–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., Ho, V. T., & Greenberg, J. (2006). I-deals: Idiosyncratic terms in employment relationships. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 977–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruscio, J., Whitney, D. M., & Amabile, T. M. (1998). Looking inside the fishbowl of creativity: Verbal and behavioral predictors of creative performance. Creativity Research Journal, 11(3), 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarooghi, H., Libaers, D., & Burkemper, A. (2015). Examining the relationship between creativity and innovation: A meta-analysis of organizational, cultural, and environmental factors. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), 714–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarros, J. C., Cooper, B. K., & Santora, J. C. (2008). Building a climate for innovation through transformational leadership and organizational culture. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15(2), 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli, W. B. (2013). What is engagement? In C. Truss, K. Alfes, R. Delbridge, A. Shantz, & E. Soane (Eds.), Employee engagement in theory and practice (pp. 15–35). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2003). Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 703–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity (1st ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, L.-Y., Zhang, Z., Qi, J., & Chen, Z. X. (2012). Empowerment and creativity: A cross-level investigation. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(1), 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, P. (2008). Leadership and creativity. In J. Zhou & C. E. Shalley (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity (1st ed., pp. 95–124). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137–1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2004). The pygmalion process and employee creativity. Journal of Management, 30(3), 413–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 591–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tung, R. L., & Varma, A. (2008). Expatriate selection and evaluation. In P. B. Smith, M. F. Peterson, & D. C. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural management research (pp. 367–378). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. I. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M., & O’Reilly, C. A. (2002). Winning through innovation: a practical guide to leading organizational change and renewal. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vancouver, J. B., Weinhardt, J. M., & Schmidt, A. M. (2010). A formal, computational theory of multiple-goal pursuit: Integrating goal-choice and goal-striving processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 985–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vila, L. E., Perez, P. J., & Coll-Serrano, V. (2014). Innovation at the workplace: Do professional competencies matter? Journal of Business Research, 67, 752–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S. D. (2004). Personality, attitude, and leader influences on divergent thinking and creativity in organizations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(3), 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, R. W., & Schoenfeldt, L. F. (1990). An interactionist model of creative behavior. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 24(4), 279–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yidong, T., & Xinxin, L. (2013). How ethical leadership influence employees’ innovative work behavior: A perspective of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(2), 441–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, F., & Zhou, J. (2008). Differential effects of expected external evaluation on different parts of the creative idea production process and on final product creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 20(4), 391–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. A. (1999). An evaluative essay on current conceptions of effective leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. A. (2009). Leading organizational learning: Reflections on theory and research. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(1), 49–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. A. (2012a). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Boston: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. A. (2012b). Effective leadership behavior: What we know and what questions need more attention. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(4), 66–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., & Roelfsema, H. (2014). Globalization, foreign direct investment, and regional innovation in China. Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy, 05(03), 1440007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J. (2003). When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: Role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 413–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J. (2008). Promoting creativity through feedback. In J. Zhou & C. E. Shalley (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity (1st ed.). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J., & Hoever, I. J. (2014). Research on workplace creativity: A review and redirection. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 333–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Indian Institute of Management Lucknow, Lucknow, India

    Mohammad Haris Minai & Shailendra Singh

  2. Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

    Arup Varma

Authors
  1. Mohammad Haris Minai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shailendra Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Arup Varma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Florida International University, College of Business, Miami, Florida, USA

    Sumit Kundu

  2. Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

    Surender Munjal

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Minai, M.H., Singh, S., Varma, A. (2017). Leading for Innovation. In: Kundu, S., Munjal, S. (eds) Human Capital and Innovation. Palgrave Studies in Global Human Capital Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56561-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation