Abstract
The chapter provides a conceptual basis for the book by linking learning gain with ipsative assessment to identify both the potential value and the limitations of these measures. Learning gain in the form of aggregated data is used particularly for secondary education to monitor and improve institutional and teacher effectiveness and there is growing interest in learning gain in higher education. Related ideas of continuous improvement and learning gain data used in research are also relevant. The chapter critically reviews learning gain measurement and argues that although learning gain data can give a more equitable picture of institutional performance than examination or exit data alone, there are reliability issues as well as resistance from elite players. Furthermore, large-scale learning gain measurement does not directly help individual teachers and learners. Although such personal learning gain information could benefit learners through both qualitative and quantitative ipsative assessment and feedback, at present the opportunities are understated and ipsative assessment remains largely elusive.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderman, E. M., Gimbert, B., O’Connell, A. A., & Riegel, L. (2015). Approaches to academic growth assessment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 138–153.
Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
Ball, S. J. (2013). The education debate. 2nd edition. Bristol: Policy Press.
Bloomer, M., & Hodkinson, P. (2000). Learning careers: Continuity and change in young people’s dispositions to learning. British Educational Research Journal, 26(5), 583–597.
Broadfoot, P. (1996). Education, assessment and society. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Coates, H., & McCormick, A. C. (2014). Introduction: student engagement-A window into undergraduate education. In H. Coates & A. C. McCormick (Eds.), Engaging university students: International insights from system-wide studies (pp. 1–12). Dordrecht: Springer.
Dew, J. R. & Nearing, M.M. (2004). Continuous quality improvement in higher education. Westport: American Council on Education/Praeger.
Goldstein, H., Huiqi, P., Rath, T., & Hill, N. (2000). The use of value added information in judging school performance. London: Institute of Education, University of London. http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/team/hg/value-added-school-performance.html. Accessed July 2015.
Hazelkorn, E. (2015). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: The battle for world-class excellence. 2nd edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
Higher Education Academy. (2015). Grade point average: Report of the GPA pilot project 2013–14. New York: Higher Education Academy.
Higher Education Funding Council for England [HEFCE] (2015). Invitation to submit expressions of interest in piloting and evaluating measures of learning gain, http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/2015/CL,042015/. Accessed July 2015.
Hughes, G. (2014). Ipsative assessment: Motivation through marking progress. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hughes, G., Smith, H., & Creese, B. (2015). Not seeing the wood for the trees: Developing a feedback analysis tool to explore feed forward in modularised programmes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(8), 1079–1094.
Kooloos, J., Klaassen, T., Vereijken, M., Van Kuppeveld, S., Bolhuis, S., & Vorstenbosch, M. (2011). Collaborative group work: Effects of group size and assignment structure on learning gain, student satisfaction and perceived participation. Medical Teacher, 33(12), 983–988.
Liu, L. (2011). Value-added assessment in higher education. A comparison of two methods. Higher Education, 61(4), 445–461.
Lodge, J. M., & Bonsanquet, A. (2014). Evaluating quality learning in higher education: Re-examining the evidence. Quality in Higher Education, 20(1), 3–23.
Marginson, S. (2009). The knowledge economy and higher education: Rankings and classifications, Research metrics and learning outcomes measures as a system for regulating the value of knowledge. Higher Education Management and Policy, 21(1), 31–46.
McGrath, C. M., Guerin, B., Harte, E., Frearson, M., & Manville, C. (2015). Learning gain in higher education. Cambridge: Rand Corporation. http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR900/RR996/RAND_RR996.pdf. Accessed July 2015.
McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2006). All you need to know about action research. London: Sage.
Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.
Norton, L. S. (2008). Action research in teaching and learning: A practical guide to conducting pedagogical research in universities. London: Routledge.
Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–289.
Schön, D. (1991). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. 2nd edition. Aldershot: Arena Ashgate.
Steedle, J. T. (2012). Selecting value-added models for postsecondary institutional assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(6), 637–652.
Tam, M. (2004). Using students’ self‐reported gains as a measure of value‐added. Quality in Higher Education, 10(3), 253–260.
Walker, M. (2015). The quality of written peer feedback on undergraduates’ draft answers to an assignment, and the use made of the feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(2), 232–247.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hughes, G. (2017). Exploring the Relationship Between Ipsative Assessment and Institutional Learning Gain. In: Hughes, G. (eds) Ipsative Assessment and Personal Learning Gain. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56502-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56502-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-56501-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56502-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)