Skip to main content

Exploring the Relationship Between Ipsative Assessment and Institutional Learning Gain

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ipsative Assessment and Personal Learning Gain

Abstract

The chapter provides a conceptual basis for the book by linking learning gain with ipsative assessment to identify both the potential value and the limitations of these measures. Learning gain in the form of aggregated data is used particularly for secondary education to monitor and improve institutional and teacher effectiveness and there is growing interest in learning gain in higher education. Related ideas of continuous improvement and learning gain data used in research are also relevant. The chapter critically reviews learning gain measurement and argues that although learning gain data can give a more equitable picture of institutional performance than examination or exit data alone, there are reliability issues as well as resistance from elite players. Furthermore, large-scale learning gain measurement does not directly help individual teachers and learners. Although such personal learning gain information could benefit learners through both qualitative and quantitative ipsative assessment and feedback, at present the opportunities are understated and ipsative assessment remains largely elusive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderman, E. M., Gimbert, B., O’Connell, A. A., & Riegel, L. (2015). Approaches to academic growth assessment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 138–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (2013). The education debate. 2nd edition. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomer, M., & Hodkinson, P. (2000). Learning careers: Continuity and change in young people’s dispositions to learning. British Educational Research Journal, 26(5), 583–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadfoot, P. (1996). Education, assessment and society. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, H., & McCormick, A. C. (2014). Introduction: student engagement-A window into undergraduate education. In H. Coates & A. C. McCormick (Eds.), Engaging university students: International insights from system-wide studies (pp. 1–12). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dew, J. R. & Nearing, M.M. (2004). Continuous quality improvement in higher education. Westport: American Council on Education/Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H., Huiqi, P., Rath, T., & Hill, N. (2000). The use of value added information in judging school performance. London: Institute of Education, University of London. http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/team/hg/value-added-school-performance.html. Accessed July 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazelkorn, E. (2015). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: The battle for world-class excellence. 2nd edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Higher Education Academy. (2015). Grade point average: Report of the GPA pilot project 2013–14. New York: Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higher Education Funding Council for England [HEFCE] (2015). Invitation to submit expressions of interest in piloting and evaluating measures of learning gain, http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/2015/CL,042015/. Accessed July 2015.

  • Hughes, G. (2014). Ipsative assessment: Motivation through marking progress. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, G., Smith, H., & Creese, B. (2015). Not seeing the wood for the trees: Developing a feedback analysis tool to explore feed forward in modularised programmes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(8), 1079–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kooloos, J., Klaassen, T., Vereijken, M., Van Kuppeveld, S., Bolhuis, S., & Vorstenbosch, M. (2011). Collaborative group work: Effects of group size and assignment structure on learning gain, student satisfaction and perceived participation. Medical Teacher, 33(12), 983–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L. (2011). Value-added assessment in higher education. A comparison of two methods. Higher Education, 61(4), 445–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, J. M., & Bonsanquet, A. (2014). Evaluating quality learning in higher education: Re-examining the evidence. Quality in Higher Education, 20(1), 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2009). The knowledge economy and higher education: Rankings and classifications, Research metrics and learning outcomes measures as a system for regulating the value of knowledge. Higher Education Management and Policy, 21(1), 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, C. M., Guerin, B., Harte, E., Frearson, M., & Manville, C. (2015). Learning gain in higher education. Cambridge: Rand Corporation. http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR900/RR996/RAND_RR996.pdf. Accessed July 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2006). All you need to know about action research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, L. S. (2008). Action research in teaching and learning: A practical guide to conducting pedagogical research in universities. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1991). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. 2nd edition. Aldershot: Arena Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedle, J. T. (2012). Selecting value-added models for postsecondary institutional assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(6), 637–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tam, M. (2004). Using students’ self‐reported gains as a measure of value‐added. Quality in Higher Education, 10(3), 253–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M. (2015). The quality of written peer feedback on undergraduates’ draft answers to an assignment, and the use made of the feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(2), 232–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gwyneth Hughes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hughes, G. (2017). Exploring the Relationship Between Ipsative Assessment and Institutional Learning Gain. In: Hughes, G. (eds) Ipsative Assessment and Personal Learning Gain. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56502-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56502-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-56501-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56502-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics