Leisure and “The Civilising Process”
- 956 Downloads
This chapter examines the German sociologist Norbert Elias’ theory of “The Civilising Process” in relation to leisure. It sets out the main tenets of this theory and its implications for thinking sociologically about leisure (and sport). It discusses the international debate among scholars over “football hooliganism” that took place in the late 1980s and 1990s in which Eliasan theorists (self-styled “figurationists”) played a leading role. It also examines the key Eliasan proposition that leisure in modern societies, since these societies are inherently “unexciting”, entails a necessary quest for excitement. This chapter suggests that discussion of these questions did less to enhance understanding of these matters than it might have. This chapter closes with a brief consideration of the main criticisms that have been levelled at Eliasan sociologists and their understanding of leisure.
KeywordsCivilising process Leisure Sport, the body Hooliganism Emotions Excitement
Thanks to Peter Bramham and Spencer Swain for commenting on, and helping to improve, the earlier drafts of this chapter.
- Attwood, F. (Ed.). (2010). porn.com : Making sense of online pornography. Oxford: Peter Lang.
- Butterfield, H. (1973). The Whig interpretation of history. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Callinicos, A. (1999). Social theory: A historical introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Cook, W. (1994). Ha, Bloody Ha: Comedians talking. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
- Daisey, M. (2015, August 22). Amazon’s brutal work culture will stay: Bottom lines matter more than people. The Guardian. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/aug/22/amazon-brutal-work-culture. Accessed 9 Nov 2015.
- Dredge, S. (2014, December 31). Study claims more than 80% of ‘dark net’ traffic is to child abuse sites. The Guardian. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/dec/31/dark-web-traffic-child-abuse-sites. Accessed 9 Nov 2015.
- Dunning, E. (1994). The social roots of football hooliganism: A reply to the critics of the “Leicester school”. In R. Giulianotti, N. Bonney, & M. Hepworth (Eds.), Football, violence and social identity (pp. 128–157). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Dunning, E. (2008). Notes on the text. In N. Elias & E. Dunning (Eds.), Quest for excitement: Sport and leisure in the civilising process (pp. ix–xvi). Dublin: University College Dublin Press.Google Scholar
- Dunning, E., & Hughes, J. (2013). Norbert Elias and modern sociology: Knowledge, interdependence, power, process. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
- Dunning, E., & Rojek, C. (Eds.). (1992). Sport and leisure in the civilising process: Critique and counter-critique. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Dunning, E., & Sheard, K. (1979). Barbarians, gentlemen and players: A sociological study if the development of Rugby football. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
- Dunning, E., Murphy, P., & Williams, J. (1988). The roots of football hooliganism: An historical and sociological study. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Elias, N. (1956). Problems of involvement and detachment. The British Journal of Sociology, 7(3), 226–252. See also unige.ch/sciences-societe/socio/files/9014/0533/6294/Elias_1956.pdf. Accessed 8 Nov 2015.
- Elias, N. (1969). The civilizing process volume 1: The history of manners. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Elias, N. (1982). The civilizing process volume II: State formation and civilization. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Elias, N. (1986). An essay on sport and violence. In N. Elias & E. Dunning (Eds.), Quest for excitement: Sport and leisure in the civilising process (pp. 150–173). Dublin: University College Dublin Press.Google Scholar
- Elias, N. (2000). The civilising process: Sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations (Rev. ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Elias, N., & Dunning, E. (1971). Folk football in mediaeval and early modern Britain. In E. Dunning (Ed.), The sociology of sport: A selection of readings (pp. 116–132). London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
- Elias, N., & Dunning, E. (2008). The quest for excitement in leisure. In N. Elias & E. Dunning (Eds.), Quest for excitement: Sport and leisure in the civilising process (pp. 44–72). Dublin: University College Dublin Press.Google Scholar
- Freud, S. (1991). On metapsychology. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Gerth, H., & Mills, C. W. (Eds. and Trans.). (1967). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1971). The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth: Pelican.Google Scholar
- Hughes, J. (2003). Learning to smoke: Tobacco use in the West. London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Liston, K. (2011). Sport and leisure. In N. Gabriel & S. Mennell (Eds.), Norbert Elias and figurational research: Processual thinking in sociology (pp. 160–180). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Newburn, T. (1992). Permission and regulation: Law and morals in post-war Britain. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Newsinger, J. (2015, November). The privatization of military power. Socialist Review, 22–24.Google Scholar
- Parker, S. (1971). The future of work and leisure. London: MacGibbon and Kee.Google Scholar
- Wilson, J. (1992). Cleaning up the game: Perspectives on the evolution of professional sports. In E. Dunning & C. Rojek (Eds.), Sport and leisure in the civilising process: Critique and counter-critique (pp. 65–95). Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Wouters, C. (1977). Informalisation and the civilising process. In P. R. Gleichmann et al. (Eds.), Human figurations: Essays for Norbert Elias (pp. 437–456). Amsterdam: Stichting Amsterdams Sociologisch Tijdschrift [Amsterdam Sociological Review].Google Scholar