Advertisement

Reclaiming the “F-word”: Structural Feminist Theories of Leisure

  • Bronwen L. Valtchanov
  • Diana C. Parry
Chapter
  • 951 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter explores how structural feminist theories have informed leisure research over the last four decades. Structural feminist theories are broadly situated with a focus on liberal and radical feminist theories. We suggest how these foundational feminist theories have influenced key ideas about popular culture and leisure. These considerations of structural feminist theories are extended to the development of structural feminist critiques of leisure in six bodies of work by different scholars, within three central contexts: health, physical activity, and popular culture. Collectively, we hope to highlight the value, diversity, and complexity of structural feminist theories of leisure to critique and challenge the social structures and power relations that limit possibilities for all people.

Keywords

Structural feminist theories Radical feminist theory Liberal feminist theory Popular culture Health Physical activity Leisure 

References

  1. Aitchison, C. C. (2003). Gender and leisure: Social and cultural perspectives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Aitchison, C. C. (2013). Gender and leisure policy discourses: The cultural turn to social justice. In V. J. Freysinger, S. M. Shaw, K. A. Henderson, & D. M. Bialeschki (Eds.), Leisure, women, and gender (pp. 521–540). State College: Venture Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Aronson, P. (2003). Feminists or “postfeminists”? Young women’s attitudes toward feminism and gender relations. Gender & Society, 17(6), 903–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braithwaite, A. (2002). The personal, the political, third-wave and postfeminisms. Feminist Theory, 3(3), 335–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Card, C. (Ed.). (2003). The Cambridge companion to Simone de Beauvoir. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. de Beauvoir, S. (1974 [1949]). The second sex (H. M. Parshley, Trans. and Ed.). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  7. Dines, G. (2010). Pornland: How porn has hijacked our sexuality. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  8. Douglas, S. J. (2010). Enlightened sexism: The seductive message that feminism’s work is done. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
  9. Dworkin, A. (1981). Pornography: Men possessing women. New York: Perigee Books.Google Scholar
  10. Ferguson, A. (1984). Sex war: The debate between radical and libertarian feminists. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 10(1), 106–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Firestone, S. (1970). The dialectic of sex. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  12. Freysinger, V. J., Shaw, S. M., Henderson, K. A., & Bialeschki, D. M. (Eds.). (2013). Leisure, women, and gender. State College: Venture Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Fullagar, S. (2008). Leisure practices as counter-depressants: Emotion-work and emotion-play within women’s recovery from depression. Leisure Sciences, 30, 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fullagar, S. (2013). Women’s leisure and the gendered politics of health. In V. J. Freysinger, S. M. Shaw, K. A. Henderson, & D. M. Bialeschki (Eds.), Leisure, women, and gender (pp. 425–438). State College: Venture Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Given, L. M. (Ed.). (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Hargreaves, J. (2003 [1994]). Sporting females: Critical issues in the history and sociology of women’s sports. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Hayes, E., & Flannery, D. D. (2000). Women as learners: The significance of gender in adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  18. Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2012). Feminist research: Exploring, interrogating, and transforming the interconnections of epistemology, methodology, and method. In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (2nd ed., pp. 1–16). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Hole, J., & Levine, E. (1971). Rebirth of feminism. New York: Quadrangle.Google Scholar
  20. Jaggar, A., & Rothenberg, P. (Eds.). (1984). Feminist frameworks. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  21. Kearney, M. C. (2007). Productive spaces: Girls’ bedrooms as sites of cultural production. Journal of Children and Media, 1(2), 126–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kivel, B. D., & Johnson, C. W. (2009). Consuming media, making men: Using collective memory work to understand leisure and the construction of masculinity. Journal of Leisure Research, 4(1), 110–134.Google Scholar
  23. Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. C. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 97–128). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. McRobbie, A. (2000). Sweet smell of success? New ways of being young women. In A. McRobbie (Ed.), Feminism and youth culture (2nd ed., pp. 198–214). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. McRobbie, A. (2009). The aftermath of feminism: Gender, culture and social change. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. McRobbie, A., & Garber, J. (2000 [1976]). Girls and subcultures. In A. McRobbie (Ed.), Feminism and youth culture (2nd ed., pp. 12–25). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Millett, K. (1970). Sexual politics. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  28. Parry, D. C. (2005). Work, leisure, and support groups: An examination of the ways women with infertility respond to pronatalist ideology. Sex Roles, 53(5–6), 337–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Parry, D. C. (2014). My transformative desires: Enacting feminist social justice leisure research. Leisure Sciences, 36(4), 349–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parry, D. C., & Fullagar, S. (2013). Feminist leisure research in the contemporary era. Journal of Leisure Research, 45(5), 571–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pilcher, J., & Whelehan, I. (2004). 50 Key concepts in gender studies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rich, A. (1979). Of woman born. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  33. Rubin, G. (1975). The traffic in women. In R. R. Reiter (Ed.), Toward an anthropology of women (pp. 157–198). New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  34. Rubin, G. (1984). Thinking sex: Notes for the radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In C. S. Vance (Ed.), Pleasure and danger: Exploring female sexuality (pp. 275–301). Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  35. Shugart, H. A. (2001). Isn’t it ironic?: The intersection of third-wave feminism and Generation X. Women’s Studies in Communication, 24(2), 131–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Snyder-Hall, R. C. (2010). Third-wave feminism and the defense of “choice”. Perspectives on Politics, 8(1), 255–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Theberge, N. (2000). Higher goals: Women’s ice hockey and the politics of gender. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  38. Tong, R. (2014). Feminist thought: A more comprehensive introduction (4th ed.). Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  39. Wearing, B. (1998). Leisure and feminist theory. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Willis, E. (1992). Radical feminism and feminist radicalism. In No more nice girls: Countercultural essays (pp. 117–150). Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Wollstonecraft, M. A. (1975 [1792]). A Vindication of the rights of woman (C. H. Poston, Ed.). New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bronwen L. Valtchanov
    • 1
  • Diana C. Parry
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations