Leisure and Hegemony

  • Robert Cassar


Leisure tells us a lot about who we are as humans and in and of itself plays a very important role in maintaining the social system as a whole. Even the most innocent of leisure activities can offer interesting insights into the ideological fabric of society. Nevertheless, the leisure industry should not be considered a single, uniform entity which delivers the same message under different forms and from different platforms. Ideological forces are not absolute and do not operate in a fatalistic kind of way. This idea is in line with Gramsci’s conceptualization of hegemony which he argued operates through a continuous process of negotiation and consent. Products which are synonymous with postindustrial society such as traveling, music and gaming can still withhold within them the power to offer counterhegemonic values. Indeed, counterhegemonic forces can manifest themselves even in the most unexpected of places such as in pornography and/or hostess clubs.


Leisure Gramsci Ideology Hegemony Negotiation and consent Agency-theory Consumerism Counterhegemony 


  1. Baris Kilinc, D. (2006). Labour, leisure and freedom in the philosophies of Aristotle, Karl Marx and Herbert Marcuse. M.A. thesis, The Graduate School of Social Sciences of Middle East Technical University [online]. Available from: Accessed 24 May 2015.
  2. Baudrillard, J. (1981). For a critique of the political economy of the sign. St Louis: Telos.Google Scholar
  3. Best, S. (2010). Leisure studies: Themes and perspectives. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  4. Bramham, P., & Wagg, S. (2011). Unforbidden fruit: From leisure to pleasure. In P. Bramham & S. Wagg (Eds.), The new politics of leisure (pp. 1–10). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carpentier, N., & Cammaerts, B. (2006). Hegemony, democracy, agonism and journalism: An interview with Chantal Mouffe. Journalism Studies, 7(6), 964–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Foucault, M. (1972–1977). In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  7. Gagné, N. O. (2010). The business of leisure, the leisure of business, rethinking hegemonic masculinity through gendered service in Tokyo hostess clubs. Asian Anthropology, 9(1), 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ging, D. (2005). A “manual on masculinity”? The consumption and use of mediated images of masculinity among teenage boys in Ireland. Irish Journal of Sociology, 14(2), 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hamilton-Smith, E. (2006). Work, leisure and optimal experience. Leisure Studies [online]. Available from: Accessed 15 June 2015.
  10. Harris, D. (2005). From class struggle to the politics of leisure: The effects of gramscianism on cultural studies (pp. 115–136). New York: Taylor and Francis, e-Library, Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Kivel, B. D., & Johnson, C. W. (2009). Consuming media, making men: Using collective memory work to understand leisure and the construction of masculinity. Journal of Leisure Research, 41(1), 110–134.Google Scholar
  12. Marcuse, H. (1974). Eros and civilization: A philosophical inquiry into Freud. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  13. Mclean, D. D., & Hurd, A. R. (2012). Kraus’ recreation and leisure in modern society (9th ed.). London: Jones and Bartlett Learning International.Google Scholar
  14. Parry, D. C. (2005). Women’s leisure as resistance to pronatalist ideology. Abstracts of Papers Presented at the Eleventh Canadian Congress on Leisure Research, May 17–20, 2005 [online] Available from: Accessed 29 May 2015.
  15. Richards, G. (2004). The future of leisure consumption. In B. Bargeman, K. Breedveld, & H. Mommaas (Eds.), De Veranderende Tijd: Opstellen over tijd and vrijetijd (pp. 329–339). Tilburg: Tilburg University.Google Scholar
  16. Rojek, C. (1990). Baudrillard and leisure. Leisure Studies, 9(1), 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rojek, C. (2013). Is Marx still relevant to the study of leisure? Leisure Studies, 32(1), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rowe, D. (2006). Coming to terms with leisure and globalization. Leisure Studies, 25(4), 423–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sharpe, E. (2005). Having fun and changing the world: Intersections of pleasure and politics at a community music festival. Abstracts of Papers Presented at the 11th Canadian Congress of Leisure Research, May 17–20, 2015 [online]. Available From: Accessed 24 July 2015.
  20. Wearing, B., & Wearing, S. (1992). Identity and the commodification of leisure. Leisure Studies, 11(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wearing, S. L., Wearing, J., McDonald, M., & Wearing, M. (2015). Leisure in a world of “com-pu-pu-pu-pu-pu-pu-pu-pu-pu-pu-puter-puter, puter games”: A father and son conversation. Annals of Leisure Research, 18, 219–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wilson, J. (1980). Sociology of leisure. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Cassar
    • 1
  1. 1.Quality Assurance DepartmentDirectorate for Quality and Standards in EducationFlorianaMalta

Personalised recommendations