Abstract
In this chapter, we consider the role of leisure according to Hegel through reflecting on the centrality of the Lord/Slave dialectic contrasted with a Nietzschean concept of work and leisure (or otium). We found that while Hegel’s negative concept of leisure is Modern, Nietzsche’s theorisation of otium develops an already postmodern concept. First, we show how Hegel masterfully poses the issue, describing the dialectic which makes work transforming and turns leisure into slavery. Second, we examine the reasons why only work is liberating, describing the dialectical process that occurs in the confrontation between consciousness desiring mutual recognition, without desiring mutual annihilation. Thus, by showing how two conflicting desires of consciences can be resolved through the process of recognition, the final section of this text presents how the desire of a conscience must be suppressed and transformed in work (resented, according to Nietzsche), while the other, the desire of the Lord, is the only acceptable desire, but without the possibility of recognition. Finally, we conclude—in line with Gorz and Lafargue—that it is necessary to rethink the concepts of leisure and work in the light of a new conception of temporality, to discuss the profound political implications that the Hegelian vision of work and leisure still bears on contemporary societies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Free translation from the original French of a note by Jean Hyppolite in his commented translation of Hegel’s work La Phénomenologie de l’Esprit, published in the 1940s.
- 2.
According to Hegelian thought, the Lord’s non-working time does not produce anything, not even its own subjectivity. Nietzsche, however, uses the classical terminology otium, free time, and in particular for Nietzsche, the free time of the philosophers.
References
Gorz, A. (2013). Bâtir la Civilisation du Temps Libéré. Paris: Editions Les Liens Qui Libérent.
Hegel, G. (1941). La Phénoménologie de l'Esprit (J. Hyppolite, Trans.). Paris: Aubier.
Hegel, G. W. (1967). Hegel’s philosophy of right (T. Knox, Trans.). New York: Oxford Univesity Press.
Hegel, G. (1977). Phenomenology of spirit. Miller, A.V., & Findlay, J. N. New York: Oxford Uiversity Press.
Lafargue, P. (2011). O Direito à Preguiça. Lisboa: Teorema.
Nietzsche, F. (1996a). A Gaia Ciência. Lisboa: Círculo de Leitores.
Nietzsche, F. (1996b). Para Além do Bem e do Mal. Lisboa: Círculo de Leitores.
Nietzsche, F. (1997a). Ecce Homo. Lisboa: Círculo de Leitores.
Nietzsche, F. (1997b). Para a Genalogia da Moral: um escrito polémico. Lisboa: Círculo de Leitores.
Read, J. (2013, April 7). Contradictions at work: The task for a philosophy of labor (with Hegel, Marx, and Spinoza). Available from: http://www.unemployednegativity.com/2013/04/contradictions-at-work-task-for.html. Accessed 19 Feb 2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baptista, M.M., Latif, L. (2017). Unproductive Leisure and Resented Work: A Brief Incursion in Hegel (and in Nietzsche). In: Spracklen, K., Lashua, B., Sharpe, E., Swain, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Leisure Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56479-5_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56479-5_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-56478-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56479-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)