Skip to main content

Abstract

Gaes (2009) conducted a meta-analysis of the relationship between prison-based education programs and post-release outcomes. His analysis assesses if, how, and why adult-basic education, GED programs, and vocational training programs affect post-release recidivism and employment rates. Gaes’ analysis showed that inmates who participated in any type of education program while incarcerated tended to have lower recidivism rates (see also Hill, 2008). This connection is postulated in the design of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s (CDCR) education programs in the Expert Panel’s (2007) report, “A Roadmap for Effective Offender Programming California.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aos, S., Miller, M., & Drake, E. (2006). Evidence-based public policy options to reduce future prison construction, criminal justice costs, and crime rates. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aos, S., Phipps, P., Baroski, R., & Lieb, R. (2001). The comparative costs and benefits of programs to reduce crime, Version 4. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, J., Lawrenz, F., Craft, E., Cudmore, W., Hall, J., & Waintraub, J. (2007). Models for curricular materials development: Combining applied development processes with theory. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16, 491–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, D. P. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 267–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brazzell, D., Crayton, A., Mukamal, D. A., Soloman, A. L., & Lindahl, N. (2009). From the classroom to the community: Exploring the role of education during incarceration and re-entry. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. (2009a). Fourth quarter 2008 facts and figures. Retrieved from www.cdcr.ca.gov/Adult_Operations/docs/Fourth_Quarter_2009_Facts_and_Figures.pdf

  • California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. (2010). 2010 adult institutions outcome evaluation report. Retrieved from http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/Adult_Research_Branch/Research_Documents/ARB_FY0506_Outcome_Evaluation_Report.pdf

  • Comings, J. P. (2003). Establishing an evidence-based adult education system. National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy. Retrieved from Harvard Graduate School of Education website: http://ncsall.gse.harvard.edu/research/opcomings3.pdf

  • Comings, J. P., Soricone, L., & Santos, M. (2006). An evidence-based adult education program model appropriate for research. National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy (NCSALL) Occasional Paper. Retrieved from http://www.ncsall.net/fileadmin/resources/research/op_comings4.pdf

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, A. J., Rich, W., & Waters, T. (2009, October). Curriculum evaluation. State of California, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California State University, Chico. Retrieved from California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation website: http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/Adult_Research_Branch/Research_Documents/Final%20Curric_Eval_V%202_to_UCD%202-22-10%20FINAL.pdf

  • Dufour, R., Dufour, R., Eaker, R., & Many, T. (2006). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.

    Google Scholar 

  • Expert Panel. (2007). California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation expert panel on adult offender and recidivism reduction programming: Report to the California State Legislature—A roadmap for effective offender programming in California. Retrieved from Prison Legal News website: https://www.prisonlegalnews.org/media/publications/roadmap_for_effective_offender_programming_ca_panel_recommendations_2007.pdf

  • Finch, C. R., & Crunkilton, J. R. (1999). Curriculum development in vocational and technical education: Planning, content and implementation (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, N. (2010). The effective teacher's guide: 50 ways to engage students and promote interactive learning (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaes, G. G. (2009, March). The impact of prison education programs on post-release outcomes. Paper presented at the Reentry Roundtable on Education, New York, NY. Retrieved from Urban Institute website: www.urban.org/projects/reentry-roundtable/roundtable10.cfm

  • Gehring, T. (1992). Correctional teacher skills, characteristics and performance indicators. Issues in Teacher Education, 1(2), 22–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, E. (2008, February). From cellblocks to classrooms: Reforming inmate education to improve public safety. Retrieved from California Legislative Analyst’s Office website: http://www.lao.ca.gov/laoapp/PubDetails.aspx?id=1704

  • Hunter, M. (1973). Make each five minutes count. Instructor, 83(3), 97–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keiser, J., Lawrenz, F., & Appleton, J. (2004a). Technical education curriculum assessment. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 29(3), 181–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, S., & Turner, J. (2009). Rethinking the effects of classroom activity structure on the engagement of low-achieving students. Teachers College Record, 111(7), 1665–1692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langan, P. A., & Levin, D. J. (2002). Recidivism of prisoners released from prison in 1994 (BJS publication No. NCJ 193427). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D. L. (2008, March). Structure and components of successful educational programs. Paper presented at the Reentry Roundtable on Education, New York, NY. Retrieved from Education Justice Project website: http://www.educationjustice.net/home/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Mackenzie-2008.pdf

  • Marzano, R. J. (2003). Classroom management that works: Research based strategies for every teacher. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Construction Education and Research. (2007). Craft instructor’s guide: Instructor certification training program. Gainesville, FL: NCCER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterman, K. F., & Kottkamp, R. B. (2004). Reflective practice for educators (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersilia, J. (2000). When prisoners return to the community: Political, economic, and social consequences. Retrieved from National Institute of Justice website: www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles1/nij/184253.pdf

  • Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, V. (2003). The dilemmas of professional development. Phi Beta Kappan International, 84(5), 401–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secretary’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills. (1991). What work requires of schools: A SCANS report for America 2000. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Showers, J., & Joyce, B. (1996). The evolution of peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 53(6), 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, A. L., Johnson, K., Travis, J., & McBride, E. (2004). From prison to work: The employment dimensions of prisoner reentry. Retrieved from Urban Institute website: http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/411097_From_Prison_to_Work.pdf

  • Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Three-Judge Court Panel. (2009). Coleman et al. v. Schwarzenegger et al., No. Civ. S-90-0520 LKK JFM P, No. Civ. C01-1351 TEH (E. D. Cal. August 4, 2009). Retrieved from United States Courts for the Ninth District website: http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/general/2009/08/04/Opinion%20&%20Order%20FINAL.pdf

  • Uggen, C., & Staff, S. (2004). Work as a turning point for criminal offenders. In J. L. Krienert & M. S. Fleisher (Eds.), Crime and employment: Critical issues in crime reduction for corrections (pp. 141–166). Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, G. (1993). Assessment: Authenticity, context, and validity. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(3), 200–208. 210–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, K. K., & Nicotera, A. (2007). Successful schools and educational accountability. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dick, A.j., Rich, W., Waters, T. (2016). Report: Literature Review. In: Prison Vocational Education and Policy in the United States. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56469-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56469-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-56468-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56469-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics