Skip to main content

Incorporating Fringe Benefits in Loss Calculations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Forensic Economics

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of how a loss of employer-provided fringe benefits is valued. Employers offer benefits because of scale economies and tax advantages, and to attract and keep employees. The major fringes, health insurance and retirement plans are valued differently depending on the type of information available. For youngsters with no work experience, their value is based on statistics showing the average employer cost of benefits, or the average individual replacement cost of benefits. For employees, it is information on the costs incurred by the worker’s employer. The perspective in personal injury and wrongful termination cases differs from that in death cases where the focus shifts from the value the worker places on benefits to the value that dependents of the deceased worker place on them. The final section of the paper discusses court cases involving fringes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ben-Zion, B. (2001–2002). The valuation of the loss of future pension income. Journal of Legal Economics, 11(3), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, M. C., Black, D. A., Messer, J., & Scott, F. A. (2002). COBRA, spouse coverage, and health insurance decisions of older households. Journal of Forensic Economics, 15(2), 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookshire, M., Luthy, M. R., & Slesnick, F. L. (2009). 2009 survey of forensic economists: Their methods, estimates and perspectives. Journal of Forensic Economics, 21(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, J. N. (1998). The exercise and valuation of executive stock options. Journal of Financial Economics, 48, 127–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costo, S. L. (2006, February). Trends in retirement plan coverage over the last decade. Monthly Labor Review, pp. 58–64, http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2006/02/art5full.pdf

  • Eriksson, T., & Kristensen, N. (2014). Wages or fringes: Some evidence on trade-offs and sorting. Journal of Labor Economics, 32(4), 899–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Expectancy Data (2015). Employer paid benefits: Ending March, 2015. Kansas: Shawnee Mission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Expectancy Data (2016). Full-time earnings in the United States: 2014 edition. Kansas: Shawnee Mission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fjeldsted, B. (1993). The significance of the distinction between a life annuity and an annuity certain for a term equal to life expectancy. Journal of Forensic Economics, 7(1), 125–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, E. (2010). Life expectancies, joint life expectancies, life annuities, and joint life annuities. Journal of Legal Economics, 16(2), 111–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, E. (2014). Measuring lost health insurance benefits with limited information. Journal of Legal Economics, 20(1–2), 125–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frasca, R. (1992). The inclusion of fringe benefits in estimates of earnings loss: A comparative analysis. Journal of Forensic Economics, 5(2), 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. W., & Taylor, B. A. (2002). Employer-sponsored health insurance: Past, present and future. Journal of Forensic Economics, 15(2), 181–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, T. R.. (2014). Determining the value of past lost insurance. Unpublished Manuscript, March 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. D. (2010). A note on life expectancy and mortality adjustment. Journal of Legal Economics, 17(1), 101–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Educational Trust. (2015). Employer health benefits survey. http://kff.org/health-costs/report/2015-employer-health-benefits-survey/

  • Lazear, E. P., & Shaw, K. L. (2007). Personnel economics: The economist’s view of human resources. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(4), 91–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, E. P., & Oyer, P. (2013). Personnel economics. In R. Gibbons & D. J. Roberts (Eds.), Handbook of organizational economics (pp. 479–519). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milkovich, George and Jerry Newman (2010).Compensation. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyer, Paul. (2008). Salary or benefits? Research in Labor Economics, 28, 429–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyer, Paul, & Scott Schaefer. (2005). Why do some firms give stock options to all employees? An empirical examination of alternative theories. Journal of Financial Economics, 76 (1), 99–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). Public Law 111–148 (enacted 3/23/2010), and Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (Reconciliation Act), Public Law 111–152 (enacted 3/30/2010), collectively referred to as the Affordable Care Act or “ACA.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, J. D. (2000). Estimating the loss of social security benefits. The Earnings Analyst, 3, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, J. D. (2002). Valuing losses of pension benefits. Journal of Forensic Economics, 15(2), 205–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, J. D.. (2007). Fringe benefit losses, (Chapter 4). In Michael L. Brookshire, Frank Slesnick & John O. Ward (Eds.), The plaintiff and defense attorney’s guide to understanding economic damages. Tucson: Lawyers & Judges Publishing Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, J. D. (2012). Handling unemployment. Unpublished manuscript, http://tinyurl.com/gt8qwff

  • Rodgers, J. D. (2013). Should the earnings of full-time year-round workers be used to estimate the lifetime earnings of children? Unpublished manuscript. http://tinyurl.com/h7ctfwt

  • Shapiro, S. J., & O’Connor, M. L. (2001). Employee stock options as a source of compensation. Litigation Economics Review, 5(1), 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skoog, G. R., Ciecka, J. E., & Krueger, K. V. (2011). The Markov process model of labor force activity: Extended tables of central tendency, shape, percentile points and bootstrap standard errors. Journal of Forensic Economics, 22(2), 165–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Social Security and Medicare Boards of Trustees. (2015). Status of the social security and medicare programs: A summary of the 2015 annual reports. https://www.ssa.gov/oact/TRSUM/tr15summary.pdf

  • Taylor, P. C., & Ireland, T. R. (1996). Accounting for medicare, social security benefits and payroll taxes in federal cases: Federal case law and errors by many forensic economists. Litigation Economics Digest, 2(1), 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinari, F., & Betz, K. T. (2013). Valuing non-wage compensation of private sector labor union workers in the construction trades. Journal of Forensic Economics, 24(2), 205–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucek, D. G. (2009). Calculating survival probabilities. Journal of Legal Economics, 16(1), 111–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2003–08). Employment and earnings, 2003–08, Table A16 for the months of January, April, July and October. For 2009–2015. http://www.bls.gov/opub/ee/2011/cps/annavg7_2010.pdf

  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2012, December). Retirement costs for defined benefit plans higher than for defined contribution plans. Beyond the Numbers: Pay and Benefits, 1(21), pp. 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015a). National compensation survey: Employee benefits in the United States, 2015. http://www.bls.gov/ncs/ebs/2015/benefits_health.htm

  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015b, December 9). Employer costs for employee compensation—September, 2015. News Release USDL-15-2329. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/ecec.pdf

  • U.S. Department of Labor. FAQs about retirement plans and ERISA. http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/faqs/faq_consumer_pension.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rodgers, J.D. (2016). Incorporating Fringe Benefits in Loss Calculations. In: Tinari, F. (eds) Forensic Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56392-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56392-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-57109-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56392-7

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics