Forensic Economists and Their Changing Viewpoints Over Time

  • Michael L. Brookshire
  • Frank L. Slesnick


This chapter represents a summary of the 11 surveys, administered and published by the authors, of members of the National Associational Association of Forensic Economics. The chapter discusses what the surveys have revealed about several important issues including the methodology used by forensic economists, their forensic practice, and the ethical issues they have faced. Although the results of these surveys, as is true of any survey result, must be used with caution, all of the surveys have been accepted for publication, have been cited in numerous articles, and have been cited in court testimony. The most recent survey was published in February 2015 and there are continuing plans for the publication of future surveys.


Interest Rate Real Interest Rate Agency Cost Nominal Interest Rate Total Family Income 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Chu, Q. C., Pittman, D. N., & Yu, L. Q. (2011). When do tips price adjust to inflation information? Financial Analysts Journal, 67(2), 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Daniel, J. (2012). Sampling essentials: Practical guidelines for making sampling choices. Los Angeles: Sage Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Expectancy Data. (2013). The dollar value of a day. Shawnee Mission: Time Diary Analysis.Google Scholar
  4. Grivoyannis, E. C., & Tinari, F. D. (2005). Estimates of labor productivity of economic damages experts. Journal of Forensic Economics, 18(2–3), 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Luthy, M., Brookshire, M., Rosenbaum, D., Schap, D., & Slesnick, F. L. (1990 in review). A 2015 survey of forensic economists: Their methods, estimates, and perspectives, submitted to the Journal of Forensic Economics.Google Scholar
  6. Richards, H., & Donaldson, M. (2010). The life, participation, employment method. In Life and worklife expectancies (2nd ed.). Tucson: Lawyers & Judges Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  7. Ruble, M., Patton, R. T., & Nelson, D. M. (2007). Patton-Nelson personal consumption tables, 2005–06. Journal of Forensic Economics, 20(3l), 217–225.Google Scholar
  8. Skoog, G., Ciecka, J., & Krueger, K. (2011). The markov process model of labor force activity: Extended tables of general tendency, shape, percentile points, and otstrap standard errors. Journal of Forensic Economics, 22(2), 165–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Smith, S. J. (1982). Tables of working life, the increment-decrement model, Bulletin 2135. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.Google Scholar
  10. Weathington, B., Cunningham, C., & Pittenger, D. (2010). Research methods for the behavioral and social sciences. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael L. Brookshire
    • 1
  • Frank L. Slesnick
    • 2
  1. 1.Brookshire Barrett & AssociatesCharlestonUSA
  2. 2.Sun City CenterHillsborough CountyUSA

Personalised recommendations