Advertisement

An Introduction to the Field of Forensic Economics

  • Frank D. Tinari
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter reviews the major issues regarding the calculation of economic damages in the context of civil litigation. We explain how economic experts provide a variety of services to the legal profession beyond calculation of economic losses. The process by which the expert arrives at an opinion of loss is not complicated but requires careful consideration of various facts and assumptions that touch upon every aspect of the expert’s work. The chapter emphasizes that the forensic economist creates an alternative universe of what would have occurred absent the injury or incident, but one grounded on known facts and economic and statistical trends. In its review of the key issues faced by economic experts, the chapter also notes a number of unresolved or disputed issues.

Keywords

Economic Damage Annual Earning Federal Court Expert Testimony State Court 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. American Academy of Economic and Financial Experts. www.aaefe.org
  2. Brookshire, M. L. (2003). A history of the National Association of Forensic Economics, 1986–2001. Litigation Economics Review, 6(1), 22–32.Google Scholar
  3. Expectancy Data. (2014). The dollar value of a day: Time diary analysis. Shawnee Mission, Kansas: Expectancy Data.Google Scholar
  4. Ireland, T. R. University of Missouri-St. Louis web page: http://www.umsl.edu/divisions/artscience/economics/ForensicEconomics/useful.html.
  5. Ireland, T. R., & Depperschmidt, T. O. (1999). Assessing family loss in wrongful death litigation: The special roles of lost services and personal consumption. Tucson: Lawyers & Judges Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  6. Ireland, T. R., Horner, S. M., Rodgers, J. D., Gaughan, P. A., Trout, R. R., & Piette, M. J. (1998). Expert economic testimony: Reference guides for judges and attorneys. Tucson: Lawyers & Judges Publishing Co..Google Scholar
  7. Johnson, W. D. (1991). Qualifications, ethics and professional responsibility in forensic economics. Journal of Forensic Economics, 4(3), 277–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kaufman, R. T., Rodgers, J. D., & Martin, G. D. (Eds.) (2005). Economic foundations of injury and death damages. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, Ltd.Google Scholar
  9. Martin, G. D., & Weinstein, M. A. (2012). Determining economic damages. Costa Mesa: James Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. National Association of Forensic Economics. www.nafe.net
  11. Rodgers, J. D., & Weinstein, M. A. (2014). An updated history of the National Association of Forensic Economics: 2002–2014. Journal of Forensic Economics, 25(2), 175–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sattler, E. L. (1991). Economists, ethics, and the marketplace. Journal of Forensic Economics, 4(3), 263–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tinari, F. D. (2016). Demonstrating Lost Earnings: Algebraic vs. Spreadsheet Method. The Earnings Analyst, 15, 21–32.Google Scholar
  14. Tinari, F. D. (2014, April). A comment on George DeMartino’s “Professional economic ethics: The posnerian and naive perspectives. Journal of Forensic Economics, 25(1), 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tinari, F. D., & Grivoyannis, E. (2005, Fall). Estimates of labor productivity of economic damages experts. Journal of Forensic Economics, 18(2–3), 139–153.Google Scholar
  16. Viscusi, W. K. (2014). The value of individual and societal risks to life and health. In M. J. Machina & W. K. Viscusi (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of risk and uncertainty (Vol. 1, pp. 385–452). Oxford: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  17. Ward, J. O., & Krueger, K. V. (1994). Establishing damages in catastrophic injury litigation. Tucson: Lawyers & Judges Publishing Co.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank D. Tinari
    • 1
  1. 1.Seton Hall UniversityFlorham ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations