Advertisement

Grandfathers pp 217-228 | Cite as

Maternal Grandfathers and Child Development in England: Impact on the Early Years

  • Antti O. TanskanenEmail author
  • Mirkka Danielsbacka
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life book series (PSFL)

Abstract

This chapter uses data from the Millennium Cohort Study to investigate an association between maternal grandfathers’ involvement and child development in the UK. This is one of the first studies to explore whether there is any link between grandfather involvement with younger children and improved development. Grandfathers’ involvement is measured by contact frequencies reported by children’s mothers and child development by Foundation Stage Profile (FSP) reported by teachers. Children whose mothers reported more contacts with maternal grandfathers also had higher FSP scores than children with no contacts. However, daily contacts with maternal grandfathers were not associated with higher scores. Although high-intensity grandfather involvement with young grandchildren may not be associated with improved child development, a lesser amount of contact with grandfathers may improve a child’s cognitive abilities.

Keywords

Child development England Maternal grandfathers 

References

  1. Attar-Schwartz, S., Tan, J. P., Buchanan, A., Flouri, E., & Griggs, J. (2009). Grandparenting and adolescent adjustment in two-parent biological, lone-parent, and step-families. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnett, M. A., Scaramella, L. V., Neppl, T. K., Ontai, L., & Conger, R. D. (2010). Intergenerational relationship quality, gender, and grandparent involvement. Family Relations, 59, 28–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buchanan, A., & Flouri, E. (2008). Involved grandparenting and child well-being: Non-technical summary (research summary) ESRC End of Award Report, RES-000-22-2283. Swindon: ESRC.Google Scholar
  4. Card, D. (1999). The causal effect of education on earnings. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 3, pp. 1801–1863). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  5. Chan, T. W., & Boliver, V. (2013). The grandparents effect in socialmobility: Evidence from British birth cohort studies. American Sociological Review, 78, 662–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coall, D. A., & Hertwig, R. (2010). Grandparental investment: Past, present, and future. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 1–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Currie, J., & Thomas, D. (1999). Early test scores, socioeconomic status and future outcomes. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 6943. http://www.econ.ucla.edu/people/papers/currie/NCDSDOC.PDF. Accessed in July 2012.
  8. Currie, J., & Thomas, D. (2001). Early test scores, school quality, and SES: Long-run effects on wage and employment outcomes. Worker Wellbeing in a Changing Labor Market, 20, 103–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Danielsbacka, M., Tanskanen, A. O., & Rotkirch, A. (2015). The impact of genetic relatedness and emotional closeness on intergenerational relations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77, 889–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., et al. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1428–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Erola, J., & Moisio, P. (2007). Social mobility over three generations in Finland, 1950–2000. European Sociological Review, 23, 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feinstein, L., & Duckworth, K. (2006). Development in the early years: Its importance for school performance and adult outcomes. London: Centre for Research on the Wider Benefits of Learning.Google Scholar
  13. Gibson, M. A., & Mace, R. (2005). Helpful grandmothers in rural Ethiopia: A study of the effect of kin on child survival and growth. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 469–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glaser, K., Price, D., di Gessa, G., Ribe, E., Stuchbury, R., & Tinker, A. (2014). Grandparenting in Europe: Family policy and grandparents’ role in providing childcare. London: Grandparents Plus.Google Scholar
  15. Hansen, K. (Ed.) (2010). Millennium Cohort Study first, second, third and fourth surveys. A guide to the datasets (5th ed.). London: Centre for Longitudinal Studies.Google Scholar
  16. Hansen, K., & Jones, E. M. (2008). Foundation stage profile and devolved administration teacher survey. In K. Hansen & H. Joshi (Eds.), Millennium Cohort Study third survey: A user’s guide to initial findings (pp. 98–117). London: Centre for Longitudinal Studies.Google Scholar
  17. Hawkes, K., O’Connell, J. F., & Blurton Jones, N. G. (1997). Hadza women's time allocation, offspring provisioning, and the evolution of long postmenopausal life spans. Current Anthropology, 38, 551–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heckman, J. J. (2006). Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science, 312, 900–1902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson, J. (Ed.) (2008). Millennium third survey follow-up: A guide to the school assessment datasets (1st ed.). London: Centre for Longitudinal Studies.Google Scholar
  20. Jones, D. E., Greenberg, M., & Crowley, M. (2015). Early social-emotional functioning and public health: The relationship between kindergarten social competence and future wellness. American Journal of Public Health, 105, 2283–2290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kiernan, K. E., & Mensah, F. K. (2011). Poverty, family resources and children’s early educational attainment: The mediating role of parenting. British Educational Research Journal, 37, 317–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lahdenperä, M., Russell, A. F., & Lummaa, V. (2007). Selection for long lifespan in men: Benefits of grandfathering? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 274, 2437–2444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lussier, G., Deater-Deckard, K., Dunn, J., & Davies, L. (2002). Support across two generations: Children’s closeness to grandparents following parental divorce and remarriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 363–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Møllegaard, S., & Jæger, M. M. (2015). The effect of grandparents’ economic, cultural, and social capital on grandchildren’s educational success. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 42, 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pittman, L. D. (2007). Grandmothers’ involvement among young adolescents growing up in poverty. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17, 89–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pollet, T. V., Nelissen, M., & Nettle, D. (2009). Lineage based differences in grandparental investment: Evidence from a large British cohort study. Journal of Biosocial Science, 41, 355–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. QCA. (2003). Foundation stage profile: Handbook. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.Google Scholar
  28. Scelza, B. A. (2011). The place of proximity: Social support in mother-adult daughter relationships. Human Nature, 22, 108–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sear, R., & Coall, D. A. (2011). How much does family matter? Cooperative breeding and the demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 37, 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sear, R., & Mace, R. (2008). Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin on child survival. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sear, R., Mace, R., & McGregor, I. A. (2000). Maternal grandmothers improve the nutritional status and survival of children in rural Gambia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 267, 461–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tanskanen, A. O., & Danielsbacka, M. (2012). Beneficial effects of grandparental involvement vary by lineage in the UK. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 985–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tanskanen, A. O., Jokela, M., Danielsbacka, M., & Rotkirch, A. (2014). Grandparental effects on fertility vary by lineage in the United Kingdom. Human Nature, 25, 269–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TurkuTurkuFinland
  2. 2.University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations