Skip to main content

Domestic Contexts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Regime Dynamics in EU's Eastern Neighbourhood
  • 274 Accesses

Abstract

The present chapter considers the domestic facilitators and impediments to democratisation of political regimes in the common neighbourhood between the EU and Russia. The question it seeks to answer is: Under what domestic conditions are Eastern ENP countries likely to be receptive to EU democracy promotion efforts? The chapter looks at the cost-benefit balance of rule transfer, the structures of socio-economic development, the design of the main political institutions and the dispersion of power across (veto) actors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Bader, M. (2010). Party Politics in Georgia and Ukraine and the Failure of Western Assistance. Democratization, 17(6), 1085–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beissinger, M. R. (2007). Structure and Example in Modular Political Phenomena: The Diffusion of Bulldozer/Rose/Orange/Tulip Revolutions. Perspectives on Politics, 5(2), 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boix, C., & Stokes, S. C. (2003). Endogenous Democratization. World Politics, 55, 517–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunce, V., & Wolchik, S. L. (2007). Transnational Networks, Diffusion Dynamics, and Electoral Revolutions in the Postcommunist World. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 378(1), 92–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunce, V., & Wolchik, S. L. (2008). Mixed Regimes in Postcommunist Eurasia: Tipping Democratic and Tipping Authoritarian. Working Paper 1/2008. Internet web site for the Istituto Italiano di Scienze Umane. Retrieved May 26, 2012, from http://www.sumitalia.it/ITA/link/documenti/wp_bunce_wolchik.pdf

  • Bunce, V., & Wolchik, S. L. (2009). Getting Real About Real Causes. Journal of Democracy, 20(1), 69–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, S. E. (2001). Democratization Falters in Azerbaijan. Journal of Democracy, 12(2), 118–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekiert, G., Kubik, J., & Vachudova, M. A. (2007). Democracy in the Post-Communist World: A Unending Quest? East European Politics and Societies, 21(1), 7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairbanks, C. H. (2004). Georgia’s Rose Revolution. Journal of Democracy, 15(2), 110–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fish, S. M. (1997). The Determinants of Economic Reform in the Post-Communist World. East European Politics and Societies, 21, 31–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fish, S. M. (1999). Postcommunist Subversion: Social Science and Democratization in East Europe and Eurasia. Slavic Review, 58(4), 794–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fish, S. M. (2006). Stronger Legislatures, Stronger Democracies. Journal of Democracy, 17(1), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fish, S. M., & Kroenig, M. (2006). Diversity, Conflict and Democracy: Some Evidence from Eurasia and East Europe. Democratization, 13(5), 828–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fish, S. M., & Kroenig, M. (2009). The Handbook of National Legislatures: A Global Survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. R., & Quinn, D. P. (2012). The Economic Origins of Democracy Reconsidered. American Political Science Review, 106(1), 58–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frye, T. (1999). Changes in Post-Communist Presidential Power: A Political Economy Explanation. Internet web site for the Kellogg Institute for International Studies. Retrieved January 28, 2012, from http://kellogg.nd.edu/faculty/research/pdfs/Frye.pdf

  • Gahramanova, A. (2009). Internal and External Factors in the Democratization of Azerbaijan. Democratization, 16(4), 777–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallina, N. (2010). Puzzles of State Transformation: The Cases of Armenia and Georgia. Caucasian Review of International Affairs, 4(1), 20–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gel’man, V. (2003). Post-Soviet Transitions and Democratization: Towards Theory-Building. Democratization, 10(2), 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grotz, F., & Rodriguez-McKey, M. (2001). Armenia. In D. Nohlen, F. Grotz, & C. Hartmann (Eds.), Elections in Asia and the Pacific: A Data Handbook, Vol. I: Middle East, Central Asia, and South Asia (pp. 319–346). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, H. E. (2005). Regime Cycles: Democracy, Autocracy, and Revolution in Post-Soviet Eurasia. World Politics, 58, 133–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herron, E. S. (2011). Measuring Dissent in Electoral Authoritarian Societies: Lessons from Azerbaijan’s 2008 Presidential Election and 2009 Referendum. Comparative Political Studies, 44(11), 1557–1583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Trade Centre. (2016). List of Products Exported by Azerbaijan. Internet web site for the ITC. Retrieved February 7, 2016, from http://www.intracen.org/

  • Ioffe, G. (2013). Geostrategic Interest and Democracy Promotion: Evidence from Post-Soviet Space. Europe-Asia Studies, 65(7), 1255–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishiyama, J. T., & Kennedy, R. (2001). Superpresidentialism and Political Party Development in Russia, Ukraine, Armenia and Kyrgyzstan. Europe-Asia Studies, 53(8), 1177–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knutsen, C. H., Gerring, J., Skaaning, S.-E., Teorell, J., Maguire, M., Coppedge, M., et al. (2015). Economic Development and Democracy: An Electoral Connection. Working Paper 2015:16. Internet web site for the V-Dem Institute. Retrieved December 19, 2015, from https://v-dem.net/media/filer_public/a9/ed/a9ed1167-f7b0-40a0-8613-131e16afd171/v-dem_working_paper_2015_16.pdf

  • Kurtz, M. J., & Barnes, A. (2002). The Political Foundations of Post-communist Regimes: Marketization, Agrarian Legacies, or International Influences. Comparative Political Studies, 35, 524–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. The American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M. (1981). Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M., Seong, K.-R., & Torres, J. C. (1993). A Comparative Analysis of the Social Requisites of Democracy. International Social Science Journal, 45(2), 155–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFaul, M. (2002). The Fourth Wave of Democracy and Dictatorship: Noncooperative Transitions in the Postcommunist World. World Politics, 54(2), 212–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, L. A. (2009). Compromising Democracy: State Building in Saakashvili’s Georgia. Central Asian Survey, 28(2), 171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pop-Eleches, G. (2007). Historical Legacies and Post-Communist Regime Change. The Journal of Politics, 908–926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Protsyk, O. (2011). Semi-Presidentialism under Post-Communism. In R. Elgie, S. Moestrup, & Y.-S. Wu (Eds.), Semi-Presidentialism and Democracy (pp. 98–116). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. L. (2001). Does Oil Hinder Democracy? World Politics, 53(3), 325–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rustow, D. A. (1970). Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model. Comparative Politics, 2(3), 337–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasse, G. (2013). Linkages and the Promotion of Democracy: The EU’s Eastern Neighbourhood. Democratization, 20(4), 553–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shugart, M. S. (1998). The Inverse Relationship between Party Strength and Executive Strength: A Theory of Politicians’ Constitutional Choices. British Journal of Political Science, 28(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tudoroiu, T. (2007). Rose, Orange, and Tulip: The Failed Post-Soviet Revolutions. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 40, 315–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Energy Information Agency. (2016). International Energy Statistics. Internet web site for the US EIA. Retrieved February 7, 2016, from www.eia.gov

  • Valiyev, A. M. (2006). Parliamentary Elections in Azerbaijan. A Failed Revolution. Problems of Post-Communism, 53(3), 17–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Way, L. A. (2004). The Sources and Dynamics of Competitive Authoritarianism in Ukraine. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 20(1), 143–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Way, L. A. (2005). Authoritarian State Building and the Sources of Regime Competitiveness in the Fourth Wave. The Cases of Belarus, Moldova, Russia, and Ukraine. World Politics, 57, 231–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Way, L. A. (2008). The Real Causes of the Color Revolutions. Journal of Democracy, 19(3), 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Buscaneanu, S. (2016). Domestic Contexts. In: Regime Dynamics in EU's Eastern Neighbourhood. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56326-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics