Abstract
The foundation of stable democracy in Spain was built on a settled account: the agreement that both sides were equally guilty of violence, a consensus created to avoid contention, a pact of oblivion as the pathway to peace and democracy. Cracks have begun to appear in this foundation. It became possible, even if not completely socially acceptable, to speak openly about the past, to disclose the testimonies of the victims, and to ask for truth and justice. Contentious coexistence that put political participation, contestation, and expression in practice began to emerge. This chapter summarizes the arguments and evidence in the book about how this recent transformation has occurred. It recognizes that political processes are not always linear and inexorable. Thus, it remains to be seen how far contentious coexistence will go in Spain.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The only exception was the sensationalist journal Interviú. Aguilar and Ferrándiz (2016) have analyzed the reasons for this coverage and for its lack of resonance in other national media outlets.
- 2.
The transmission of identities of victimization in Spain is explored in Aguilar et al. (2011).
- 3.
The case of the Socialist Party is very ambiguous. Despite the uncontestable advances of the so-called Law of Historical Memory of 2007, whenever the Socialist Party has been in charge of the government it has tended to be extremely cautious with respect to memory issues. However, when it is in the opposition, it normally proposes much more daring initiatives, in part because stigmatizing the Partido Popular for its Francoist roots still seems to provide electoral benefits, and in part because the generational replacement that has taken place in the party has helped it to overcome its former reluctance to take on these previously highly controversial issues.
- 4.
The influence of international actors should not be underestimated. The Report on Spain by the Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation, and guarantees of non-recurrence has had an enormous impact on the capacity of the associations to organize collective action. In fact, the above mentioned demonstration explicitly referenced the recommendations contained in the report. (Report on Spain by the Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence. United Nations. A/HRC/27/56/Add.1 22 July 2014).
References
Aguilar, P. (2008a). Transitional or post-transitional justice? Recent developments in the Spanish case. South European Society & Politics, 13(4), 417–433.
Aguilar, P. (2013). Judiciary involvement in authoritarian repression and transitional justice: The Spanish case in comparative perspective. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 7(2), 245–266.
Aguilar, P., Balcells, L., & Cebolla, H. (2011). Determinants of attitudes towards transitional justice: An empirical analysis of the Spanish case. Comparative Political Studies, 44(10), 1397–1430.
Aguilar, P., & Ferrándiz, F. (2016). Memory, media and spectacle: Interviú’s portrayal of Civil War exhumations in the early years of Spanish democracy. Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies, 17(1), 1–25.
Ferrándiz, F. (2010). De las fosas comunes a los derechos humanos: El descubrimiento de desapariciones forzadas en la España contemporánea. Revista de Antropología Social, 19(1), 161–189.
Juliá, S. (2004). Historia de las dos Españas. Madrid: Taurus.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Payne, L.A., Aguilar, P. (2016). Conclusion. In: Revealing New Truths about Spain's Violent Past. St Antony's Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56229-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56229-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-56228-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56229-6
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)