Abstract
Richard North focuses upon the central ethical question of The Franklin’s Tale concerning generosity and the calmness with which Arveragus discovers that his wife has promised to sleep with Aurelius. North argues that while Arveragus maintains the terms of his initial agreement with his wife, upholding the conditions of the pact made between them at the beginning of the tale, this is soured by his threat to kill her if she reveals it to anyone else. North identifies a different ethical conundrum at the heart of the tale and its relationship with the Franklin, namely, what value Chaucer may find in the calmness of Arveragus, and how it may stand at odds with the Franklin’s own reading of events.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Works Cited
Archibald, Elizabeth. 2000. The Breton Lay in Middle English: Genre, Transmission and the Franklin’s Tale. In Medieval Insular Romance: Translation and Innovation, eds. Judith Weiss, Jennifer Fellows, and Morgan Dickson, 55–70. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.
Bennett, Judith M. 1988. Public Power and Authority in the Medieval Countryside. In Women and Power in the Middle Ages, eds. Mary Erler and Maryanne Kowaleski, 18–36. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
Benson, Larry B., ed. 1987. The Riverside Chaucer [based on the Works of Geoffrey Chaucer edited by F.N. Robinson], 3 edn. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Bowman, Mary R. 1993. ‘Half as She Were Mad’: Dorigen in the Male World of the Franklin’s Tale. The Chaucer Review 27: 239–251.
Branca, Vittore. ed. 1967. Tutte le Opere di Giovanni Boccaccio, rev. A.D. Quaglio, 12 vols. Milan: Arnoldo Mondadori.
Burlin, Robert B. 1977. Chaucerian Fiction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Carruthers, Mary J. 1981. The Gentilesse of Chaucer’s Franklin. Criticism 23: 283–300.
Cooper, Helen, ed. 1989. The Canterbury Tales. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 2002. The Frame. In Sources and Analogues of ‘the Canterbury Tales’, vol I, eds. Robert M. Correale and Mary Hamel, 1–22. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.
Correale, Robert M., and Mary Hamel, eds. 2002. Sources and Analogues of ‘the Canterbury Tales’, vol I, 220–232. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.
Coss, Peter. 2014. The Franklin. In Historians on Chaucer: The ‘General Prologue’ to the Canterbury Tales, eds. Stephen H. Rigby and Alastair J. Minnis, 227–246. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davenport, W.A. 1988. Chaucer, Complaint and Narrative, Chaucer Studies 14. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.
Eaton, R.D. 2000. Narrative Closure in Chaucer’s Franklin’s Tale. Neophilologus 84(2): 309–321.
Edwards, Robert R. 2000. Rewriting Menedon’s Story: Decameron 10.5 and the Franklin’s Tale. In The ‘Decameron’ and the ‘Canterbury Tales’: New Essays on an Old Question, eds. Leonard M. Koff and Brenda D. Schildgen, 226–246. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
———. 2002. The Franklin’s Tale. In Sources and Analogues of ‘the Canterbury Tales’, vol I, eds. Robert M. Correale and Mary Hamel, 211–265. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.
Finlayson, John. 2008. Invention and Disjunction: Chaucer’s Rewriting of Boccaccio in the Franklin’s Tale. ES 89(4): 385–402.
Fyler, John. 1987. Love and Degree in the Franklin’s Tale. The Chaucer Review 21: 321–337.
Gaylord, Alan T. 1964. The Promises in the Franklin’s Tale. English Literary History 31(4): 331–365.
Havely, N.R. 1980 [repr. 1992]. Chaucer’s Boccaccio: Sources for ‘Troilus’ and ‘the Knight’s’ and ‘Franklin’s Tale’: Translations from the ‘Filostrato’, ‘Teseida’ and ‘Filocolo, Chaucer Studies 5. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.
Hume, Kathryn L. 1972. Why Chaucer Calls the Franklin’s Tale a Breton Lai. Philological Quarterly 51: 365–379.
Jacobs, Kathryn. 1985. The Marriage Contract of the Franklin’s Tale: The Remaking of Society. The Chaucer Review 20(2): 132–143.
Kittredge, George L. 1911–1912. Chaucer’s Discussion of Marriage. Modern Philology 9: 435–467.
Lewis, Robert E., gen., ed. 1953–2001. The Electronic Middle English Dictionary, based on Middle English Dictionary. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Lucas, Angela M., and Peter J. Lucas. 1991. The Presentation of Marriage and Love in Chaucer’s Franklin’s Tale. ES 72(6): 501–512.
Lumiansky, Robert M. 1955. Of Sondry Folk: The Dramatic Principle in the Canterbury Tales. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Lynch, Kathryn L. 2002. East Meets West in Chaucer’s Squire’s and Franklin’s Tales. In Chaucer’s Cultural Geography, ed. Kathryn L. Lynch, 76–101. New York: Routledge.
Mann, Jill. 1982–1988. Chaucerian Themes and Style in the Franklin’s Tale. In New Pelican Guide to English Literature, vol. 1, part 1: Medieval Literature: Chaucer and the Alliterative Tradition, ed. Boris Ford, 133–153. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
———. 2002. Feminizing Chaucer [first published 1991], 2 edn. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.
———, ed. 2005. Geoffrey Chaucer: The Canterbury Tales. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Marteau, Pierre, [Jean Croissandeau] ed. and trans. 1878–1879. Le Rommant de la Rose par Guillaume de Lorris et Jean de Meung, 4 vols. Paris.
Minnis, Alastair J. 1986. From Medieval to Renaissance? Chaucer’s Position on Past Gentility. Proceedings of the British Academy 72: 205–246.
Morgan, Gerald, ed. 1980. Geoffrey Chaucer: The Franklin’s Tale from the Canterbury Tales. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
———. 1986. Boccaccio’s Filocolo and the Moral Argument of the Franklin’s Tale. The Chaucer Review 20(4): 285–306.
North, John D. 1988. Chaucer’s Universe. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Peck, Russell A. 1967. Sovereignty and the Two Worlds of the Franklin’s Tale. The Chaucer Review 1(4): 253–271.
Reeve, Michael D., ed. and Neil Wright trans. 2007. Geoffrey of Monmouth: The History of the Kings of Britain: An Edition and Translation of De Gestis Britonum [Historia Regum Britanniae]. Arthurian Studies, vol 69. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.
Shoaf, Allen R. 2001. Chaucer’s Body: The Anxiety of Circulation in the ‘Canterbury Tales. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.
Specht, Henrik. 1981. Chaucer’s Franklin in ‘the Canterbury Tales’: The Social and Literary Background of a Chaucerian Character. Publications of the Department of English, University of Copenhagen, 10. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.
Thompson, N.S. 1996. Chaucer, Boccaccio, and the Debate of Love: A Comparative Study of ‘the Decameron’ and ‘the Canterbury Tales. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Wilcockson, Colin. 2003. Thou and Tears: The Advice of Arveragus to Dorigen in Chaucer’s Franklin’s Tale. RES 54(215): 308–312.
Wirtjes, Hanneke. 1985. Bertilak de Hautdesert and the Literary Vavasour. ES 64: 291–301.
Wright, Michael J. 1998. Isolation and Individuality in the Franklin’s Tale. Studia Neophilologica 70: 181–186.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
North, R. (2017). Sleeping Dogs and Stasis in The Franklin’s Tale . In: Bintley, M., Locker, M., Symons, V., Wellesley, M. (eds) Stasis in the Medieval West?. The New Middle Ages. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56199-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56199-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95033-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56199-2
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)