The Artistic ‘Touch’: Moving Beyond Carceral Boundaries Through Art by Offenders
Highlighting the 2011 Koestler Award ‘Art by Offenders’ Exhibition, Turner demonstrates how prisoners may interact with the world outside of prison, despite their incarceration. Drawing on a range of prisoner artwork, Turner argues that prisoners producing art and ‘outsiders’ interacting with it has a number of important purposes. In the sale of artwork, prisoners contribute to a system of production and economic exchange. Furthermore, as well as generating their own income, the celebration of these pieces through specific awards helps in the self-production of creative individuals legitimised in the arts community and wider society. Finally, Turner draws on literatures of ‘touch’ and hapticality to consider how production and consumption of this artwork may enhance prisoners’ ability to ‘touch’ the world outside of prison.
I would like to extend my thanks to Fiona Curran, Director of Arts at the Koestler Trust who dedicated much time and effort to contacting artists and gaining permissions in relation to the artwork used in this chapter. My thanks also go to the anonymous reviewer and collection editors for their helpful suggestions in strengthening this chapter.
- Anderson, Farida. 1992. ‘Problems of Keeping in Touch.’ In Prisoner’s Families: Keeping in Touch, edited by Roy Light, 21–24. Bristol: Bristol Centre for Criminal Justice.Google Scholar
- Bankes, Ariane. 2004. ‘Art Behind Bars.’ The Spectator. September 18.Google Scholar
- Beck, Ulrich, and Beck-Gernsheim. Elisabeth. 2002. Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and Its Social and Political Consequences. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Brine, Richard. 2011. The Koestler Trust: A Report on the 2010 Survey of Award Entrants. London: Koestler Trust.Google Scholar
- Camhi, Morrie. 1989. The Prison Experience. Rutland, VT: Tuttle.Google Scholar
- Cardinal, Roger 1972. Outsider Art. London: Studio Vista.Google Scholar
- Cohen, Mary L. 2009. ‘Choral Singing and Prison Inmates: Influences of Performing in a Prison Choir.’ Journal of Correctional Education 60(1): 52–65.Google Scholar
- Critchley, Hugo. 2008. ‘Emotional Touch: A Neuroscientific Overview.’ In Touch in Museums: Policy and Practice in Object Handling, edited by Helen Chatterjee, 61–74. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
- Davies, Ioan. 1990. Writers in Prison. Toronto: Between the Lines.Google Scholar
- Debora, Benchoam, E. 1993. ‘Art as Refuge and Protest: Autobiography of a Young Political Prisoner in Argentina.’ Creativity Research Journal 6(1–2): 111–127.Google Scholar
- Elliott, Vikki. 2012. ‘Arts Mentoring for Recently Released Prisoners.’ Prisoners’ Education Trust. Accessed 18 August. http://www.prisonerseducation.org.uk/index.php?id=406.
- Emsley, Clive, Tim Hitchcock, and Robert Shoemaker. 2012. ‘Crime and Justice – Punishments at the Old Bailey.’ Old Bailey Proceedings. Accessed 12 August. http://www.oldbaileyonline.org/static/Punishment.jsp#branding.
- Foucault, Michel. 1988. ‘Technologies of the Self.’ In Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault, edited by Luther Martin, Huck Gutman, and Patrick H. Hutton, 16–49. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
- Fox, William M. 1997. ‘The Hidden Weapon: Psychodynamics of Forensic Institutions.’ In Drawing Time: Art Therapy in Prisons and Other Correctional Settings, edited by David Gussak and Evelyn Virshup, 43–55. Chicago, IL: Magnolia Street Publishers.Google Scholar
- Gussak, David. 1997. ‘Breaking Through Barriers: Advantages of Art Therapy in Prison.’ In Drawing Time: Art Therapy in Prisons and Other Correctional Settings, edited by David Gussak and Evelyn Virshup, 1–11. Chicago, IL: Magnolia Street Publishers.Google Scholar
- Gussak, David, and Evelyn Ploumis-Devick. 2004. ‘Creating Wellness in Forensic Populations Through the Arts: A Proposed Interdisciplinary Model.’ Visual Arts Research 29(1): 35–43.Google Scholar
- Holden, John. 2005. Throne of weapons’ A British Museum Tour. London: British Museum, A Partnership UK project.Google Scholar
- Hugunin, James. 1999. A Survey of the Representation of Prisoners in the United States: Discipline and Photographs – The Prison Experience. Lampeter: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
- Hurry, Jane, Lynne Rogers, Margaret Simonot, and Anita Wilson. 2012. Inside Education: The Aspirations and Realities of Prison Education for Under 25 s in the London Area: A Report for the Sir John Cass Foundation. London: Centre for Education in the Criminal Justice System, Institute of Education, University of London.Google Scholar
- Irigaray, Luce. 1990. Je, Tu, Nous: Pour une Culture de la Différence. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
- James, Erwin. 2010. ‘How A Little Praise in Prison Can Go a Long Way.’ The Guardian. Accessed 23 August. http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/aug/24/arts-prison-koestler-awards-praise.
- Kimball, Jane A. 2009. ‘Trench Art of The Great War.’ Magazine Antiques 176(2): 88–95.Google Scholar
- Koestler, Arthur. 1983. Dialogue With Death. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Kornfeld, Phyllis. 1997. Cellblock Visions: Prison Art in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Levinas, Emmanuel. 1981. Otherwise Than Being, or, Beyond Essence. The Hague; London: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
- Liebmann, Marian (ed.) 1994. Art Therapy With Offenders. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
- Prinzhorn, Hans. 1926. Bildnerei der Gefangenen. Studie zur Bildnerischen Gestaltung Unbegabter. Berlin: Alex Junker Verlag.Google Scholar
- Rowles, Graham D. 1978. Prisoners of Space?: Exploring the Geographical Experience of Older People. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Rubin, Susan G. 2004. Art Against the Odds: From Slave Quilts to Prison Paintings. New York, NY: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
- Samuels, Jane. 2008. ‘The British Museum in Pentonville Prison: Dismantling Barriers Through Touch and Handling.’ In Touch in Museums: Policy and Practice in Object Handling, edited by Helen Chatterjee, 253–260. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
- Saunders, Nicholas J. 2001. Trench Art: A Brief History & Guide, 1914–1939. London: Leo Cooper.Google Scholar
- Saunders, Nicholas J. 2003. Trench Art: Materialities and Memories of War. Oxford; New York, NY: Berg.Google Scholar
- Shurmer-Smith, Pamela. 2002. ‘Poststructuralist Cultural Geography.’ In Doing Cultural Geography, edited by Pamela Shurmer-Smith, 41–52. London: Thousand Oaks SAGE.Google Scholar
- Stewart, Susan. 1999. ‘From the Museum of Touch.’ In Material Memories: Design and Evocation, edited by Christopher Breward, Jeremy Aynsle, and Marius Kwint, 17–36. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
- Trust, Koestler. 2012a. ‘An Artist’s Story.’ Koestler Trust. Accessed 12 July. http://www.koestlertrust.org.uk/pages/stories.html.
- Trust, Koestler. 2012b. ‘Art Sales.’ Koestler Trust. Accessed 15 August. http://www.koestlertrust.org.uk/pages/buyart.html.
- Trust, Koestler. 2012c. ‘Awards.’ Koestler Trust. Accessed 17 August. http://www.koestlertrust.org.uk/pages/awards.html.
- Trust, Koestler. 2012d. ‘How to Enter.’ Koestler Trust. Accessed 1 September. http://www.koestlertrust.org.uk/pages/awardshowto.html.
- Tuan, Yi-fu. 1974. Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes, and Values. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. 2012. ‘Tattoos and Numbers: The System of Identifying Prisoners at Auschwitz.’ Holocaust Encyclopaedia. Accessed 17 August. http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007056.
- Vasseleu, Cathryn. 1998. Textures of Light: Vision and Touch in Irigaray, Levinas, and Merleau-Ponty. London; New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Zolberg, Vera L., and Joni Maya Cherbo. 1997. Outsider Art: Contesting Boundaries in Contemporary Culture. Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar