Conclusion: Reflections on Capturing the Carceral

  • Anna K. SchlieheEmail author
  • Dominique Moran
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology book series (PSIPP)


This volume has worked towards a diverse and in-depth engagement with the boundaries of carceral geography. The individual contributions have provided engaging, innovative and sometimes deeply unsettling explorations of these borders, extending the field conceptually, methodologically and empirically.


  1. Agamben, Giorgio. 2005. State of Exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allspach, Anke. 2010. ‘Landscapes of (Neo)liberal Control: The Transcarceral Spaces of Federally Sentenced Women in Canada.’ Gender, Place and Culture 17(6): 705–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ananth, Akhila L. 2014. ‘The Gracious Spaces of Children’s Law: Innocence and Culpability in the Construction of a Children’s Court.’ Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 63: 89–112.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, Ben. 2006. ‘Being and Becoming Hopeful: Towards a Theory of Affect.’ Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24: 733–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Armstrong, Sarah. 2015. ‘The Cell and the Corridor: Imprisonment as Waiting, and Waiting as Mobile.’ Time and Society 0(0): 1–22. doi:  10.1177/0961463X15587835.Google Scholar
  6. Burman, Michele, and Susan A. Batchelor. 2009. ‘Between Two Stools? Responding to Young Women Who Offend.’ Youth Justice 9: 270–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carrell, Christopher, and Joyce Laing. 1982. The Special Unit Barlinnie Prison – Its Evolution Through Its Art. An Anthology of Essays, Statements, Art Works, Creative Writing and Documentary Photographs. Glasgow: Third Eye Centre.Google Scholar
  8. Chesney-Lind, Meda. 2006. ‘Patriarchy, Crime, Justice: Feminist Criminology in an Era of Backlash.’ Feminist Criminology 1(1): 6–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Claes, Lien, Elisabeth De Schauwer, and Geert van Hove. 2013. ‘Disability Studies and Social Geography Make a Good Marriage: Research on Life Trajectories of People with Intellectual Disabilities and Additional Mental Health Problems.’ In Emerging Perspectives on Disability Studies, edited by Matthew Wappett and Katrina Arndt. London: Springer, 97–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Codd, Helen. 2003. ‘Women Inside and Out: Prisoners’ Partners, Women in Prison and the Struggle for Identity.’ Internet Journal of Criminology, 1–24.Google Scholar
  11. Comfort, Megan. 2008. Doing Time Together: Love and Family in the Shadow of Prison. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crewe, Ben, Jason Warr, Peter Bennett, and Alan Smith. 2014. ‘The Emotional Geography of Prison Life.’ Theoretical Criminology 8(1): 56–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davidson, Joyce, and Christine Milligan. 2004. ‘Embodying Emotion Sensing Space: Introducing Emotional Geographies.’ Social & Cultural Geography 5(4): 523–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Certeau, Michel. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Deleuze, Gilles, and Felix Guattari. 2008 [1987]. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  16. Dirsuweit, Teresa. 1999. ‘Carceral Spaces in South Africa: A Case Study of Institutional Power, Sexuality and Transgression in a Women’s Prison.’ Geoforum 30: 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fluri, Jennifer. 2012. ‘Capitalizing on Bare Life: Sovereignty, Exception, and Gender Politics.’ Antipode 44(1): 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foucault, Michel. 1991. [1977]. Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  19. Gill, Nick. 2013. ‘Mobility Versus Liberty? The Punitive Uses of Movement Within and Outside Carceral Environments.’ In Carceral Spaces: Mobility and Agency in Imprisonment and Migrant Detention, edited by Dominique Moran, Nick Gill, and Deirdre Conlon. Farnham: Ashgate, 19–36.Google Scholar
  20. Gilmore, Ruth W. 2007. Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalising California. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  21. Goffman, Erving. 1991. [1961]. Asylums: Essays on the Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. London: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hall, Edward. 2005. ‘The Entangled Geographies of Social Exclusion/Inclusion for People with Learning Disabilities.’ Health & Place 11(2): 107–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hancock, Phil, and Yvonne Jewkes. 2012. ‘Penal Aesthetics and the Pains of Imprisonment.’ Punishment & Society 13(5): 611–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hiemstra, Nancy. 2013. ‘“You Don’t Even Know Where You Are”: Chaotic Geographies of US Migrant Detention and Deportation.’ In Carceral Spaces: Mobility and Agency in Imprisonment and Migrant Detention, edited by Dominique Moran, Nick Gill, and Deirdre Conlon. Farnham: Ashgate, 57–76.Google Scholar
  25. Jewkes, Yvonne, and Dominique Moran. 2015. ‘The Paradox of the “Green” Prison: Sustaining the Environment or Sustaining the Penal Complex?’ Theoretical Criminology 19(4): 451–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lorimer, Hayden. 2005. ‘Cultural Geography: The Busyness of Being “more-than-Representational.”’ Progress in Human Geography 29: 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Masters, Cristina. 2009. ‘Femina Sacra: The “War on/of Terror”, Women and the Feminine.’ Security Dialogue 40(1): 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moran, Dominique. 2015. Carceral Geography: Spaces and Practices of Incarceration. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  29. Moran, Dominique, Judith Pallot, and Laura Piacentini. 2009. ‘Lipstick, Lace and Longing: Constructions of Femininity Inside a Russian Prison.’ Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 27(4): 700–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moran, Dominique, Nick Gill, and Deirdre Conlon (Eds.). 2013. Carceral Spaces: Mobility and Agency in Imprisonment and Migrant Detention. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  31. Moran, Dominique, Jennifer Turner, and Yvonne Jewkes. 2016. ‘Becoming Big Things: Building Events and the Architectural Geographies of Incarceration in England and Wales.’ Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 41(4): 416–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moran, Dominique, Jennifer Turner, and Schliehe Anna K. (forthcoming). Conceptualising the carceral in carceral geography. Progress in Human Geography.Google Scholar
  33. Mountz, Alison, R. Kate Coddington, Tina Catania, and Jenna M. Loyd. 2013. ‘Conceptualizing Detention: Mobility, Containment, Bordering, and Exclusion.’ Progress in Human Geography 37(4): 522–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nelson, Lise, and Seager. Joni (Eds.). 2005. A Companion to Feminist Geography. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 1–12.Google Scholar
  35. Petersilia, Joan. 2003. When Prisoners Come Home: Parole and Prisoner Reentry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Philo, Chris. 2012. ‘Security of Geography/Geography of Security.’ Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 37: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pratt, Geraldine. 2005. ‘Abandoned Women and Spaces of the Exception.’ Antipode 37(5): 1052–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schliehe, Anna K. 2014. ‘Inside “the Carceral”: Girls and Young Women in the Scottish Criminal Justice System.’ Scottish Geographical Journal 130(2): 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schliehe, Anna K. 2015. ‘Locking Up Children and Young People – Secure Care in Scotland.’ In Play, Recreation, Health and Well Being, Geographies of Children and Young People Vol. 9, edited by B Evans and John Horton. London: Routledge, 1–19. doi:  10.1007/978-981-4585-96-5.Google Scholar
  40. Sloan, Jennifer A. (2016). Masculinities and the Adult Male Prison Experience. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stoller, Nancy. 2003. ‘Space, Place and Movement as Aspects of Health Care in Three Women’s Prisons.’ Social Science and Medicine 56: 2263–2275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Turner, Jennifer, and Kimberley Peters (Eds.). 2017. Carceral Mobilities: Interrogating Movement in Incarceration. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  43. Wacquant, Loïc. 2010. ‘Crafting the Neoliberal State: Workfare, Prison Fare and Social Insecurity.’ Sociological Forum 25(2): 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of CriminologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  2. 2.School of Geography, Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations