Dialogical Conceptions of the Self and Community

  • Kenneth C. Bessant
Chapter

Abstract

Academic discourse on dialogism is hardly new, but it is attracting increased attention of late. Dialogical theory incorporates fundamental aspects of self–other relations and meaning-making processes. One of the key aspects of this perspective concerns the idea that “something” novel arises in and through dialogic interaction. This chapter considers the involvement of dialogic relations in the co-constitution of community. Based on the dialogical perspective, it can be argued that community emerges within the “between” spaces of intersubjective relations. In essence, the ongoing events of lived experience generate novel ways of relating to one another, including the prospective emergence of more comprehensive forms of organized community life. Dialogical thinking is making inroads into the theoretical interpretation of community processes, structures, and agency.

References

  1. Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3069211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aigner, S. M., Raymond, V. J., & Smidt, L. J. (2002). “Whole community organizing” for the 21st century. Community Development, 33, 86–106.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330209490144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed. and C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. (Original work published 1975).Google Scholar
  4. Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (C. Emerson, Ed. and Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1963).Google Scholar
  5. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Eds. and V. W. McGee, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. (Original work published 1979).Google Scholar
  6. Bakhtin, M. M. (1990). Art and answerability: Early philosophical essay by M. M. Bakhtin (M. Holquist & V. Liapunav, Eds. and V. Liapunov, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bakhtin, M. M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act (V. Liapunov & M. Holquist, Eds. and V. Liapunov, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. (Original work published 1986).Google Scholar
  8. Bauman, Z. (2001). Community: Seeking safety in an insecure world. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York, NY: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bessant, K. C. (2011). Authenticity, community, and modernity. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41, 2–32.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2010.00443.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bessant, K. C. (2014). The relational genesis of community: Self-other dialogue. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 24, 467–478.  https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Black, L. W. (2008). Deliberation, storytelling, and dialogic moments. Communication Theory, 18, 93–116.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00315.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bohm, D. (1996). On dialogue (L. Nichol, Ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Buber, M. (1958). I and Thou (R. G. Smith, Trans., 2nd ed.). London, UK: Continuum. (Original work published 1923).Google Scholar
  15. Buber, M. (1965). The knowledge of man: A philosophy of the interhuman (M. Friedman, Ed. and M. Friedman & R. G. Smith, Trans.). New York, NY: Harper & Row, Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Buber, M. (2002). Between man and man (R. G. Smith, Trans.). New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published 1947).Google Scholar
  17. Buckley, R. P. (1992). Husserl’s notion of authentic community. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, LXVI, 213–227.  https://doi.org/10.5840/acpq199266238 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cissna, K. N., & Anderson, R. (1998). Theorizing about dialogic moments: The Buber-Rogers position and postmodern themes. Communication Theory, 8, 63–104.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1998.tb00211.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clegg, J. W., & Salgado, J. (2011). From Bakhtinian theory to a dialogical psychology. Culture & Psychology, 17, 520–533.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X11418546 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cooper, M., Chak, A., Cornish, F., & Gillespie, A. (2013). Dialogue: Bridging personal, community, and social transformation. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 53, 70–93.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167812447298 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cresswell, J. (2011). Being faithful: Bakhtin and a potential postmodern psychology of self. Psychology & Culture, 17, 473–490.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X11418540 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cresswell, J., & Baerveldt, C. (2011). Bakhtin’s realism and embodiment: Towards a revision of the dialogical self. Culture & Psychology, 17, 263–277.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X11398308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Critchley, S. (1999). With being-with? Notes on Jean-Luc Nancy’s rewriting of Being and Time. Studies in Practical Philosophy, 1, 53–67.  https://doi.org/10.5840/studpracphil1999115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Devisch, I. (2013). Jean-Luc Nancy and the question of community. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  25. Domanov, O. (2006). Jean-Luc Nancy: An attempt to reduce community to ontology. In S. Herbrechter & M. Higgins (Eds.), Returning (to) communities: Theory, culture and political practice of the communal (pp. 111–126). New York, NY: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  26. Donati, P. (2011). Relational sociology: A new paradigm for the social sciences. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Durkheim, É. (1938). The rules of sociological method (G. E. G. Catlin, Ed. and S. A. Solovay & J. M. Mueller, Trans.). New York, NY: The Free Press. (Original work published 1895).Google Scholar
  28. Gergen, K. J. (2009a). Dialogue as collaborative action. Journal für Psychologie, 17, 1–19. Retrieved from http://www.journal-fuer-psychologie.de/index.php/jfp/article/view/155/216 Google Scholar
  29. Gergen, K. J. (2009b). Relational being: Beyond self and community. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Gergen, K. J., McNamee, S., & Barrett, F. J. (2001). Toward transformative dialogue. International Journal of Public Administration, 24, 679–707.  https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-100104770 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gillespie, A., & Cornish, F. (2010). Intersubjectivity: Towards a dialogical analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 40, 19–46.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00419.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–1522.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Guignon, C. B. (1984). Heidegger’s ‘authenticity’ revisited. The Review of Metaphysics, 38, 321–339. Retrieved from http://jstor.org/stable/20128154 Google Scholar
  34. Hanny, C., & O’Connor, K. (2013). A dialogical approach to conceptualizing resident participation in community organizing. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 20, 338–357.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2012.757322 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). New York, NY: Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. (Original work published 1927).Google Scholar
  36. Helling, A., & Thomas, J. C. (2001). Encouraging community dialog: Approach, promise, and tensions. International Journal of Public Administration, 24, 749–770.  https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-100104772 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hermans, H. J. M. (2001). The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology, 7, 243–281.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X0173001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hermans, H. J. M. (2002). The dialogical self as a society of mind: Introduction. Theory & Psychology, 12, 147–160.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354302122001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hicks, D. (2000). Self and other in Bakhtin’s early philosophical essays: Prelude to a theory of prose consciousness. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7, 227–242.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327884MCA0703_10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Holquist, M. (2002). Dialogism: Bakhtin and his world (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology (D. Carr, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1954).Google Scholar
  42. Husserl, E. (1999). Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology (D. Cairns, Trans.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (Original work published 1950).Google Scholar
  43. Isaacs, W. N. (2001). Toward an action theory of dialogue. International Journal of Public Administration, 24, 709–748.  https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-100104771 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kirk, P., & Shutte, A. M. (2004). Community leadership development. Community Development Journal, 39, 234–251.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsh019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Linder, S. H. (2001). An inquiry into dialogue, its challenges and justification. International Journal of Public Administration, 24, 651–678.  https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-100104769 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Linell, P. (1990). The power of dialogue dynamics. In I. Marková & K. Foppa (Eds.), Dynamics of dialogue (pp. 147–177). New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  47. Linell, P., & Luckmann, T. (1990). Asymmetries in dialogue: Some conceptual preliminaries. In I. Marková & K. Foppa (Eds.), Dynamics of dialogue (pp. 1–20). New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  48. Luszczynska, A. M. (2012). The ethics of community: Nancy, Derrida and Menendez. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  49. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist (C. W. Morris, Ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  50. Mead, G. H. (1938). The philosophy of the act (C. W. Morris, Ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  51. Nancy, J.-L. (1991). The inoperative community (P. Connor, Ed. and P. Connor, L. Garbus, M. Holland, & S. Sawhney, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  52. Nancy, J.-L. (2000). Being singular plural (R. D. Richardson & A. E. O’Byrne, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1996).Google Scholar
  53. Nardi, B. A. (1996). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 69–102). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  54. Nollan, V. Z. (Ed.). (2004). Bakhtin: Ethics and mechanics. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Owen, J. R., & Westoby, P. (2012). The structure of dialogic practice within development work. Community Development, 43, 306–319.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2011.632093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4531523 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shotter, J. (1998). The dialogical nature of our inner lives. Philosophical Explorations: An International Journal for the Philosophy of Mind and Action, 1, 185–200.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10001998098538699 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shotter, J. (2008). Dialogism and polyphony in organizing theorizing in organization studies: Action guiding anticipations and the continuous creation of novelty. Organization Studies, 29, 501–524.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840608088701 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shotter, J. (2010). Situated dialogic action research: Disclosing “beginnings” for innovative change in organizations. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 268–285.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109340347 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shotter, J. (2012). Gergen, confluence, and his turbulent, relational ontology: The constitution of our forms of life within ceaseless, unrepeatable, intermingling movements. Psychological Studies, 57, 134–141.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-011-0127-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stewart, J., & Zediker, K. (2000). Dialogue as tensional, ethical practice. Southern Communication Journal, 65, 224–242.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10417940009373169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Suchman, L. (1993). Response to Vera and Simon’s situated action: A symbolic interpretation. Cognitive Science, 17, 71–75.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1701_5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sullivan, P., & McCarthy, J. (2004). Toward a dialogical perspective on agency. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 34, 291–309.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8308.2004.00249.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tönnies, F. (1957). Community and society: Gemeinschaft und gesellschaft (C. P. Loomis, Ed. and Trans.). New York, NY: Harper & Row, Publishers. (Original work published 1887).Google Scholar
  66. Vološinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language (L. Matejka & I. R. Titunik, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1929).Google Scholar
  67. Warren, R. L. (1978). The community in America (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  68. Westoby, P., & Dowling, G. (2013). Theory and practice of dialogical community development: International perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Westoby, P., & Owen, J. (2009). The sociality and geometry of community development practice. Community Development Journal, 45, 58–74.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsp005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wilkinson, K. P. (1970). The community as a social field. Social Forces, 48, 311–322.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2574650 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wilkinson, K. P. (1991). The community in rural America. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth C. Bessant
    • 1
  1. 1.Brandon UniversityBrandonCanada

Personalised recommendations