Advertisement

Final Reflections: Patterns of Communication in Digital Age Corporations

  • Anna Danielewicz-Betz
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter offers a concise summary of the main observations and findings pertaining to the topic of business communication, enterprise software and digital corporations from an interdisciplinary perspective. The structure of business email communication is revisited to illustrate who communicates with whom in the corpus analysed. The similarities and differences between spoken business communication in meetings (mainly with reference to the CANBEC corpus discussed in Handford, The language of business meetings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010) and email communication (with reference to the email corpus researched) are addressed. It concludes with reflections on the definitions of business communication, an attempt at a visualisation, a discussion of limitations in the corpus analysis and a speculation on the future.

Keywords

Discursive Practice Business Meeting Business Communication Cybernetic System Enterprise Software 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bargiela-Chiappini, F., & Harris, S. J. (1996). Requests and status in business correspondence. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(5), 635–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baron, N. S. (1998). Letters by phone or speech by other means: The linguistics of email. Language & Communication, 18(2), 133–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baron, N. S. (2003). Why email looks like speech. Proofreading, pedagogy, and public face. In J. Aitchison & D. Lewins (Eds.), New media language (pp. 85–94). Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bazerman, C. (2000). Letters and the social grounding of differentiated genres. In D. Barton & N. Hall (Eds.), Letter writing as a social practice (pp. 15–29). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhatia, V. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  6. Boden, D. (1994). The business of talk: Organizations in action. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Carrió-Pastor, M. L., & Calderón, R. M. (2015). A contrastive analysis of metadiscourse features in business e-mails written by non-native speakers of English. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 173, 214–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 3–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Evison, J., McCarthy, M., & O’Keeffe, A. (2007). ‘Looking out for love and all the rest of it’: Vague category markers as shared social space. In J. Cutting (Ed.), Vague language explored (pp. 138–157). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferrara, K., Brunner, H., & Whittemore, G. (1991). Interactive written discourse as an emergent register. Written Communication, 8(1), 8–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gains, J. (1999). Electronic mail: A new style of communication or just a new medium?: An investigation into the text features of e-mail. English for Specific Purposes, 18(1), 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gee, J. P., Hull, G. A., & Lankshear, C. (1996). The new work order: Behind the language of the new capitalism. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gillaerts, P. (2012). E-mail use in a Belgian company: Looking for the hybridity of the genre. In P. Gillaerts, E. de Groot, S. Dieltjens, P. Heyndericksx, & G. Jacobs (Eds.), Researching discourse in business genres. Cases and corpora (pp. 15–31). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  14. Handford, M. J. (2007). The genre of the business meeting: A corpus-based study. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham, Nottingham (unpublished).Google Scholar
  15. Handford, M. (2010). The language of business meetings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heng, C. S., & Tan, H. (2010). Extracting and comparing the intricacies of metadiscourse of two written persuasive corpora. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 6(3), 124–146.Google Scholar
  17. Holmes, J. (1983). The structure of teacher’s directives: A sociolinguistic analysis. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 89–115). London: Longman.Google Scholar
  18. Holmes, J. (2000). Doing collegiality and keeping control at work: Small talk in government departments. In J. Coupland (Ed.), Small talk (pp. 32–61). Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  19. Holmes, J., & Stubbe, M. (2003). Power and politeness in the workplace: A sociolinguistic analysis of talk at work. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  20. Holmes, J., & Stubbe, M. (2015). Power and politeness in the workplace: A sociolinguistic analysis of talk at work (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse. Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  22. Koester, A. (2006). Investigating workplace discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Lee, D. Y. (2008). Corpora and discourse analysis: New ways of doing old things. In V. Bhatia, J. Flowerdew, & R. Jones (Eds.), Advances in discourse studies (pp. 86–99). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. McCarthy, M. (1998). Spoken language and applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. McCarthy, M., & Handford, M. (2004). “Invisible to us”: A preliminary corpus-based study of spoken business English. In U. Connor & T. Upton (Eds.), Discourse in the professions: Perspectives from corpus linguistics (pp. 167–201). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mulholland, J. (1999). E-mail: Uses, issues and problems in an institutional setting. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini & C. R. Nickerson (Eds.), Writing business: Genres, media and discourses (pp. 57–84). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  27. Nelson, M. (2000). A corpus-based study of business English and business English teaching materials. PhD thesis, University of Manchaster, Manchaster.Google Scholar
  28. Nunziata, S. (2011, September 1) Marc Benioff: Salesforce.com CEO warns of an ‘enterprise spring’. CIO Insight. Retrieved from http://www.cioinsight.com/c/a/CRM/Marc-Benioff-Salesforcecom-CEO-Warns-of-an-Enterprise-Spring-573025#sthash.6ceo9PFK.dpuf
  29. O’Keefe, A., McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (2007). From corpus to classroom: Language use and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sarangi, S., & Roberts, C. (Eds.). (1999). Talk, work and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation and management settings (Vol. 1). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  31. Wolf, G. (2010). Der Business Discourse. Effizienz und Effektivität der Internen Kommunikation. Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Danielewicz-Betz
    • 1
  1. 1.Ludwig-Maximilians University MunichGermany

Personalised recommendations