Abstract
This chapter of Communicating Creativity: The Discursive Facilitation of Creative Activity in Art shows that the primary means by which the participants make sense of their creative actions as ordered and intelligible is through the notion of idea transference, that is, the metaphorical transference of an ‘idea’ from the brief, to the students’ minds, and then to the work of art. The chapter examines how the discourse of the idea has its origins in the conceptual art of the 1960s.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Following the conventions of cognitive linguistics, small caps without italics, are used here to denote reference to a structural metaphor. Structural metaphors, unlike the systematic metaphors discussion in Chap. 6, do not necessarily occur directly in the language, but instead describe the conceptual framework of language.
- 2.
Swales (1990) identifies the communicative purpose or rationale of a genre as the ‘principal criterial feature that turns a collection of communicative events into a genre’ (p. 46).
- 3.
Habitus (Bourdieu 1993) can be glossed as the unique dispositions of an individual developed over time through a combination of the social conditions of their upbringing, as well as their education. The effects of the individual habitus are the reactions or responses, actions or activities, ways of behaving or thinking of an individual in a specific context that occur as a result of their unique dispositions.
References
Akin, Ö. (2002). Case-based instruction strategies in architecture. Design Studies, 23(4), 407–431.
Alberro, A. (2003). Conceptual art and the politics of publicity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. London, UK: Continuum.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1996). The rules of art: Genesis and structure of the literary field. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Brown, B. (2001). Representing time: The humble timesheet as a representation and some details of its completion and use. Ethnographic Studies, 6, 45–59.
Casakin, H. (2004). Metaphors in the design studio: Implications for education. In P. Lloyd, N. Roozenburg, C. McMahon, & L. Brodhurst (Chair), Symposium conducted at the meeting of the 2nd International Engineering and Product Design Education Conference: The Changing Face of Design Education, Delft.
Cuff, D. (1991). Architecture: The story of practice. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Davies, M. (2004). BYU-BNC (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). Retrieved from http://corpus.byu.edu/bnc/
Dineen, R., & Collins, E. (2005). Killing the goose: Conflicts between pedagogy and politics in the delivery of a creative education. Journal of Art and Design Education, 24(1), 43–52.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Efland, A. (1990). A history of art education: Intellectual and social currents in teaching the visual arts. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Garner, S., & McDonagh-Philp, D. (2001). Problem interpretation and resolution via visual stimuli: The use of ‘mood boards’ in design education. Journal of Art and Design Education, 20(1), 57–64.
Godfrey, T. (1998). Conceptual art. London, UK: Phaidon Press.
Goldschmidt, G., & Sever, A. L. (2011). Inspiring design ideas with texts. Design Studies, 32(2), 139–155.
Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. London, UK: Routledge.
Iedema, R. (2003). Multimodality, resemiotisation: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual communication, 2(1), 29–57.
Jansen, L., Luijten, H., & Bakker, N. (Eds.). (2009). Vincent van Gogh: The letters. Version: December 2010. Amsterdam & The Hague: Van Gogh Museum & Huygens ING. Retrieved from http://vangoghletters.org
Janson, H. W., & Janson, A. F. (2004). History of art: The Western tradition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Morgan, S. (1995). An interview with Damien Hirst. Retrieved from http://www.damienhirst.com/texts/1996/jan--stuart-morgan
Oak, A. (2000). It’s a nice idea, but it’s not actually real: Assessing the objects and activities of design. Journal of Art and Design Education, 19(1), 86–95.
Parker, T., Hiett, S., & Marley, D. (2006). Moving minds. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 25(1), 86–85.
Pollner, M., & Emerson, R. M. (2007). Ethnomethodology and ethnography. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, & L. Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 118–135). London, UK: Sage.
Prior, P. A. (1998). Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
Reddy, M. (1979). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Orotony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284–324). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sarangi, S., & Candlin, C. N. (2010). Applied linguistics and professional practice: Mapping a future agenda. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 7(1), 1–9.
Sarangi, S., & Candlin, C. N. (2011). Professional and organisational practice: A discourse/communication perspective. In C. N. Candlin & S. Sarangi (Eds.), Handbook of communication in organisations and professions. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
Stiles, K., & Selz, P. (Eds.). (1996). Theories and documents of contemporary art: A sourcebook of artists’ writings. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Sung-Yul Park, J., & Bucholtz, M. (2009). Introduction. Public transcripts: Entextualization and linguistic representation in institutional contexts. Text and Talk, 29(5), 485–502.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 63–94). London, UK: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hocking, D. (2018). Ideas. In: Communicating Creativity. Communicating in Professions and Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55804-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55804-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-55803-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55804-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)