Skip to main content

Agency

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Communicating Creativity

Part of the book series: Communicating in Professions and Organizations ((PSPOD))

  • 299 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter of Communicating Creativity: The Discursive Facilitation of Creative Activity in Arts shows how student creative activity is driven by a hypothetical orientation to the future; one which typically involves a series of affordances and constraints. These future-oriented affordances and constraints are discursively constituted by the tutors through the use of the linguistic modal system (the use of verbs, such as might, can, and will), which as well as pragmatically functioning to both constrain and facilitate personal volition, is also linked to futurity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the context of this book, 3D loosely refers to work of a sculptural nature, while spatial loosely refers to work of an interior design or architectural nature.

  2. 2.

    He also makes the point that in certain contexts the positions of participants in a dialogue will be so disparate that no intersubjectivity is possible.

  3. 3.

    The conceptualisation of ‘looking at’ something can, within the historical context of art and design production, also be connected to the concept of the gaze (see Chap. 6).

References

  • Al Zidjaly, N. (2006). Disability and anticipatory discourse: The interconnectedness of local and global aspects of talk. Communication and Medicine, 3(2), 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G. N., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candlin, C. N. (2002). Alterity, perspective and mutuality in LSP research and practice. In M. Gotti, D. Heller, & M. Dossena (Eds.), Conflict and negotiation in specialized texts (pp. 21–40). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, J. (1983). The semantics of modal auxiliaries. London, UK: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copland, F., & Creese, A. (Eds.). (2015). Linguistic Ethnography: Collecting, analysing and presenting data. London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, R. J. (2009). The September issue [Documentary]. Australia: A&E IndieFilms and Actual Reality Pictures.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Saint-George, I. (2003). Anticipatory discourses: Producing futures of action in a vocational programme for long term unemployed (PhD dissertation). Georgetown University, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. W. (1972). Educating artistic vision. London, UK: Collier-Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Encisco, P. (2007). Reframing history in sociocultural theories: Toward an expansive vision. In C. Lewis, P. Encisco, & E. B. Moje (Eds.), Reframing sociocultural research on literacy: Identity, agency and power (pp. 49–74). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotti, M. (2003). Shall and will in contemporary English: A comparison with past uses. In R. Facchinetti, M. Krug, & F. Palmer (Eds.), Modality in contemporary English (pp. 267–300). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London, UK: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J. (1986). Functions of you know in women’s and men’s speech. Language in Society, 15(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, N. (2002). A guide for busy academics: Nurturing creativity. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/resources/database/id157_Guide_for_Busy_Academics_Nurturing_Creativity.rtf

  • Johnstone, B. (1987). Introduction: Perspectives on repetition. Text, 7(3), 205–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. H. (2008). Good sex and bad karma: Discourse and the historical body. In V. K. Bhatia, J. Flowerdew, & R. H. Jones (Eds.), Advances in discourse studies (pp. 245–257). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, G. (2002). Variation in the distribution of modal verbs in the British National Corpus. In R. Reppen, S. Fitzmaurice, & D. Biber (Eds.), Using corpora to explore linguistic variation (pp. 73–90). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lambertz, K. (2011). Back-channelling: The use of yeah and mm to portray engaged listenership. Griffith Working Papers in Pragmatics and Intercultural Communication, 4(1/2), 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oak, A. (2009). Performing architecture: Talking ‘architect’ and ‘client’ into being. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, 5(1), 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peräkylä, A. (1993). Invoking a hostile world: Discussing the patient’s future in AIDS counselling. Text, 13(2), 291–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rampton, B. (2007). Neo-Hymesian linguistic ethnography in the United Kingdom. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(5), 584–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. (1982). The arts in schools: Principles, practice and provision. London, UK: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M., & Buehler, R. (2004). Identity through time: Constructing personal pasts and futures. In M. B. Brewer & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Self and social identity (pp. 25–51). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2004). Nexus analysis: Discourse and the emerging internet. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, S. B. K. (2001). Habitas, consciousness, agency and the problem of intervention: How we carry and are carried by political discourses. Folia Linguistica, 35(1-2), 97–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1987). Repetition in conversation: Towards a poetics of talk. Language, 63(3), 574–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, R., & Holland, J. (2002). Imagined adulthood: Resources, plans and contradictions. Gender and Education, 14(4), 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verplaetse, H. (2003). What you and I want: A functional approach to verb complementation of modal want to. In R. Facchinetti, M. Krug, & F. Palmer (Eds.), Modality in contemporary English (pp. 151–190). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hocking, D. (2018). Agency. In: Communicating Creativity. Communicating in Professions and Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55804-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55804-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-55803-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55804-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics