Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Fromm–Marcuse Debate and the Future of Critical Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Theory

Part of the book series: Political Philosophy and Public Purpose ((POPHPUPU))

Abstract

The Fromm–Marcuse debate in Dissent magazine published in 1955–56 was a defining moment in the intellectual careers of both theorists, and has helped define the reception of Freud for Frankfurt School scholars for over 50 years now. The literature on this debate about psychoanalytic theory and radical politics gave rise to numerous polemics between pro-Fromm and pro-Marcuse partisans, much of it now outdated as critical theorists have come to understand that they have more in common with each other than with mainstream social sciences. This chapter reviews the history of this theoretical debate on the status of Freudian theory in critical theory, and offers a synthetic reappraisal of the insights both theorists offer for a contemporary analysis of character and authoritarianism in light of contemporary debates within psychoanalysis and recent developments in Frankfurt School scholarship on the ideas and careers of both Fromm and Marcuse. The chapter discusses what a critical theory of authoritarianism offers social philosophy and social sciences in the contemporary context of capitalist crisis, cultural chaos, violence and impending environmental disaster.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, Kevin. 2015. Fromm, Marx and humanism. In Toward a human science: The relevance of Erich Fromm for today, ed. Rainer Funk, and Neil McLaughlin. Giessen: Psychocozial-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Kevin, and Russell Rockwell. 2012. The Dunayevskaya-Marcuse-Fromm correspondence, 1954–1978: Dialogues on Hegel, Marx, and critical theory. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonss, Wolfgang. 1984. Introduction. In Erich Fromm the working class in Weimar Germany. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braune, Joan. 2014. Erich Fromm’s revolutionary hope: Prophetic messianism as a critical theory of the future. Amsterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronner, Stephen Eric. 1990. Socialism unbound. NewYork: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. Of critical theory and its theorists. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, Jose. 1994. Looking into the hearts of the workers, or: How Erich Fromm turned critical theory into empirical research. Political Psychology 15(4): 631–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burston, Daniel. 1991. The legacy of Erich Fromm. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buzby, Amy. 2013. New foundations for resistance: The Marcuse-Fromm debate revisited. In Subterranean politics and Freud’s legacy, ed. Amy Buzby, 93–113. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chancer, Lynn. 1992. Sadomasochism in everyday life: The dynamics of power and powerlessness. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, Nancy. 1985. Beyond drive theory. Theory and Society 14(3): 271–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Randall. 2009. The sociology of philosophies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, Christopher Brian. 2013. Love and its refusal: Love, historical memory, and the meaning of perversion in the Fromm-Marcuse feud. MA thesis, University of Texas-Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkin, Kieran. 2014. The radical humanism of Erich Fromm. New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Lawrence J. with A.M. Schreiber. 2013. The lives of Erich Fromm’s love’s prophet. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, Erich. 1955a. The sane society. New York: Holt, Reinhart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1955b The human implications of “instinctivistic” radicalism: A reply to Herbert Marcuse. Dissent 2(4): 342–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1956a. The art of loving. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1956b. A counter-rebuttal. Dissent 3(1): 81–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1958. Psychoanalysis: Scientism or fanaticism. The Saturday Review 41: 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1959. Sigmund Freud’s mission. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1961a. Marx’s concept of man. New York: Continium.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1961b. May man prevail? New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1964. The heart of man. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [1941] 1969. Escape from freedom. New York: Holt, Reinhart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1973. The anatomy of human destructiveness. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, Erich, and Michael Maccoby. 1970. Social character in a Mexican village: A socio-psychoanalytic study. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funk, Rainer. 1982. Erich Fromm: The courage to be human. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, Irving. 1984. A margin of hope: An intellectual autobiography. New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, Russell. 1975. Social amnesia: A critique of conformist psychology from Adler to Laing. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1986. The repression of psychoanalysis: Otto Fenichel and the Freudians. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987. The last intellectuals: American culture in the age of academe. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay, Martin. 1973. The dialectical imagination: A history of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research. Boston: Little, Brown, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, Douglas. 1984. Herbert Marcuse and the crisis of Marxism. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. Erich Fromm, feminism, and the Frankfurt School. http://www.fromm-gesellschaft.eu/images/pdf-Dateien/FF-Schule92/Kellner_D_1991.pdf

  • ———. 1992. Erich Fromm, feminism, and the Frankfurt School. Lecture Given to the Symposium on „Erich Fromm und die Frankfurter Schule“ on June 1, 1991, Stuttgart (Typoscript) 1991: 2–18 – Republished on Kellner’s website.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch, Christopher. 1991. The culture of narcissism: American life in an age of diminishing expectations. New York: WW Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, Herbert. 1955. The social implications of Freudian revisionism. Dissent 2: 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [1956a] 2015. Eros and civilization: A philosophical inquiry into Freud. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1956b. A reply to Erich Fromm. Dissent 3: 79–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [1964] 2013. One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, Neil. 1996. Nazism, nationalism and the sociology of emotions: Escape from freedom revisited. Sociological Theory 14(3): 241–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998a. How to become a forgotten intellectual: Intellectual movements and the rise and fall of Erich Fromm. Sociological Forum 13: 215–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998b. Why do schools of thought fail? Neo-Freudianism as a case study in the sociology of knowledge. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 34(2): 113–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Origin myths in the social sciences: Fromm, the Frankfurt School, and the emergence of critical theory. Canadian Journal of Sociology 24(1): 109–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001a. Optimal marginality: Innovation and orthodoxy in Fromm’s revision of psychoanalysis. The Sociological Quarterly 42(2): 271–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001b. Critical theory meets America: Riesman, Fromm, and the lonely crowd. American Sociologist 2(1): 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Collaborative circles and their discontents. Revisiting conflict and creativity in Frankfurt School critical theory. Sociologica 2(2): 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickert, John. 1986. The Fromm–Marcuse debate revisited. Theory and Society 15(3): 181–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riesman, David. 1950. The lonely crowd: A study of the changing American character. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roazen, Paul. 1996. Fromm’s courage. In A prophetic analyst: Erich Fromm’s contributions to psychoanalysis, ed. Mauricio Cortina, and Michael Maccoby. Northvale: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, Sarita. 2005. “You’re calling me a racist?” The moral and emotional regulation of antiracism and feminism. Signs 31(1): 29–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stirk, Peter. 1999. Eros and civilization revisited. History of the Human Sciences 12(1): 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheatland, Thomas. 2009. Frankfurt School in exile. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggerhaus, Rolf. 1986. The Frankfurt School: Its history, theories and political significance. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

    Neil McLaughlin

Authors
  1. Neil McLaughlin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Political Science, William Paterson University, Wayne, New Jersey, USA

    Michael J. Thompson

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McLaughlin, N. (2017). The Fromm–Marcuse Debate and the Future of Critical Theory. In: Thompson, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Theory. Political Philosophy and Public Purpose. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55801-5_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation