Skip to main content

The Frankfurt School, Authority, and the Psychoanalysis of Utopia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Political Philosophy and Public Purpose ((POPHPUPU))

Abstract

The chapter first examines Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno’s well-known critique of authority and the family. One aspect of this groundbreaking work is its exclusive focus on men and boys. In the 1970s, Jessica Benjamin wrote two seminal essays critiquing this focus, showing how it resulted in the idealization of the bourgeois father and a punitive superego. This critique is part of the chapter’s study, before it moves on to Marcuse’s dialectical transformation of Freudian psychoanalysis into a ground of utopia. Arguably, there is no more important work in Marcuse’s oeuvre than Eros and Civilization. It represents the utopian spirit in critical theory at its strongest, a spirit, the author argues, that has been lost in the next generation of critical theorists, particularly in the early work of Habermas in Knowledge and Human Interests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Horkheimer’s Critique of Instrumental Reason (London: Verso, 2013), a collection of essays written between 1949 and 1967, develops the critique further. The German version, Zur Kritik der instrumentellen Vernunft, published in 1967, is actually a translation of Eclipse of Reason. Eclipse of Reason was originally published in English in 1947.

  2. 2.

    Collectively, Klein, Fairbairn, and Winnicott are known as object relations theorists. It is simpler, and more accurate, particularly in the case of Fairbairn and Winnicott, to call them relationship theorists, concerned with relationships, not drives, particularly our earliest relationships. For a good account of the transformation of psychoanalysis under object relations theory, see Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory, by Greenberg and Mitchell (1983).

  3. 3.

    The term “instinctual drives” translates the Freudian term “Trieb” (which is singular). Freud also uses the term “Instinkt.” When talking about the death drive, Freud (1930) always uses the word Trieb. Neither Trieb nor Instinkt should be considered a biological imperative for Freud. A drive is entirely psychic, a demand imposed by the organism upon the psyche to do work. How the psyche deals with its drives depends upon culture, socialization, and the family, among other forces. At issue for Marcuse is how a culture can be created in which Eros can take up the energy previously devoted to the Todestrieb.

  4. 4.

    This is actually not correct. In Stone-Age Economics, Marshall Sahlins (1974) writes that many so-called primitive societies enjoy an enormous amount of leisure. They were the original affluent society, as their needs did not exceed what the world might provide with modest effort. Scarcity is as much a matter of desire as it is an absence of things.

  5. 5.

    For example, says Honneth, see Adorno’s Minima Moralia, numbers 2, 72, 79, and 146.

  6. 6.

    Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life (2014), Honneth’s recent and powerful synthesis, can be read as an attempt to situate recognition in a modern world in which freedom is the preeminent value. The argument remains compatible with the utopian moment in Honneth’s work, but does not develop it.

Bibliography

  • Adorno, Theodor. 1968. Sociology and psychology, part 2. New Left Review 47: 47–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1974. Minima Moralia: Reflections from damaged life. Trans. E.F.N. Jephcott. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, Theodor, Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Daniel Levinson, and R. Nevitt Sanford. 1993. The authoritarian personality. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, Francis. 2010. The new Atlantis. Seaside: Watchmaker Publishing (original 1627).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, Jessica. 1977. The end of internalization: Adorno’s social psychology. Telos 32: 42–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1978. Authority and the family revisited: Or, a world without fathers? New German Critique 13: 35–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1978. Violence and metaphysics. In Writing and difference. Trans. Alan Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, Sigmund. 1905. Three essays on the theory of sexuality. In The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, vol. 7, ed. James Strachey, 146–243. London: Hogarth Press, 1953–1974. [Hereafter cited as The Standard Edition].

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1920. Beyond the pleasure principle. The Standard Edition 18: 7–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1923. The ego and the id. The Standard Edition 19: 1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1930. Civilization and its discontents. The Standard Edition 21: 59–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, Stephen, and Stephen Mitchell. 1983. Object relations in psychoanalytic theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1985. The theory of communicative action. Trans. Thomas McCarthy, 2 vols. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, Axel. 1996. The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Trans. Joel Anderson. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Postmodern identity and object-relations theory: On the seeming obsolescence of psychoanalysis. Philosophical Explorations 3: 225–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Disrespect: The normative foundations of critical theory. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Reification: A new look at an old idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Pathologies of reason: On the legacy of critical theory. Trans. James Ingram. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012a. The I in we: Recognition as a driving force in group formation. In The I in we: Studies in the theory of recognition. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012b. The work of negativity: A recognition-theoretical revision of psychoanalysis. In The I in We: Studies in the theory of recognition. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Freedom’s right: The social foundations of democratic life. Trans. Joseph Ganahl. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, Max. 1949. Authority and the family today. In The family: Its function and destiny, ed. R. Anshen. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1972. Authority and the family. In Critical theory. Trans. Matthew O’Connell et al. New York: Seabury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1974. Critique of instrumental reason. New York: The Seabury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Eclipse of reason. Eastford: Martino Fine Books. (reprint of original 1947 edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, Max and Theodor Adorno. 2002. Dialectic of enlightenment. Trans. E. Jephcott. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay, Martin. 2008. Introduction. In Axel Honneth, reification: A new look at an old idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, Emmanuel. 1998. Otherwise than being: Or beyond essence. Trans. Alphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, Herbert. 1955. Eros and civilization: A philosophical inquiry into Freud. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1970. The obsolescence of the Freudian concept of man. In Five lectures: Psychoanalysis, politics, and utopia. Trans. J. Shapiro and S. Weber. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1979. The aesthetic dimension: Toward a critique of Marxist aesthetics. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. Counterrevolution and revolt. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitscherlich, Alexander. 1992. Society without the father: A contribution to social psychology. Trans. E. Mosbacher. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petherbridge, Danielle. 2013. The critical theory of Axel Honneth. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinbach, Anson. 2014. The Frankfurt School and the ‘Jewish question,’ 1940–1970. In Against the grain: Jewish intellectuals in hard times, ed. Ezra Mendelsohn, Steffani Hoffman, and Richard Cohen. New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, Marshall. 1974. Stone-age economics. Chicago: Aldine Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Daniel. 2000. The interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitebook, Joel. 2008. First nature and second nature in Hegel and psychoanalysis. Constellations 15(3): 382–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, Donald W. 1958. Through paediatrics to psycho-analysis. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alford, C.F. (2017). The Frankfurt School, Authority, and the Psychoanalysis of Utopia. In: Thompson, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Theory. Political Philosophy and Public Purpose. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55801-5_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics