Skip to main content

Knowledge Production as Organisational Learning: The Case of Danish Universities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave International Handbook on Adult and Lifelong Education and Learning
  • 4205 Accesses

Abstract

One of the political means to encourage competitive knowledge production in universities is to employ strategic management, but is this a promising method? I explore this question through a practice-based and pragmatist version of organisational learning as well as the Nordic tradition of work and education to suggest ways for sustainable knowledge production. University scholars not only participate in research practices at their home university but also in worldwide knowledge production driven by passions for specific fields of inquiry. Further, the Nordic countries have a tradition of active participation from ‘below’ as a prerequisite for learning and innovation. Research leadership that works in collaboration with peers rather than maintaining a focus on strategic management could be an answer to more competitive and sustainable knowledge production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott, A. (2009). Organizations and the Chicago school. In P. S. Adler (Ed.), Sociology and organization studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II. Theory, method, and practice. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, J., Chandler, J., & Clark, H. (2001). Between the ivory tower and the academic assembly line. Journal of Management Studies, 38(1), 88–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, S. (2015/2009). The problem of expertise: From experience to skilful practices to expertise. Ecological and pragmatist perspectives. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 7, 8–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1970). Notes on the concept of commitment. In H. S. Becker (Ed.), Sociological work. Method and substance. Chicago: Allen Lane The Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1986). Doing things together: Selected papers. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R. J. (1966/1967). John Dewey. New York: Washington Square Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I., & Byrkjeflot, H. (2002). Changing knowledge regimes: Universities in a new research environment. Higher Education, 44, 519–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandi, U. (2010). Bringing back inquiry—Organizational learning the Deweyan way. In S. Jordan & H. Mitterhoffer (Eds.), Beyond knowledge management—Sociomaterial and sociocultural perspectives within management research. Innsbruck: Innsbruck University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandi, U., & Elkjaer, B. (2011). Organizational learning viewed from a social learning perspective. In M. Easterby-Smith & M. A. Lyles (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. D. (1986). Understanding and facilitating adult learning. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-Practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrkjeflot, H. (2003). Nordic management: From functional socialism to shareholder value? In. B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.), The Northern lights. Organization theory in Scandinavia. Trelleborg: Liber AB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney, S. (2006). University governance in Denmark: From democracy to accountability? European Educational Research Journal, 5, 221–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. E. (1991). Social worlds/arenas theory as organizational theory. In D. R. Maines (Ed.), Social organization and social process. Essays in the honor of Anselm Strauss. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. E. (2003). Situational analyses: Grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn. Symbolic Interaction, 26, 553–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S. R., Kornberger, M., Carter, C., & Rhodes, C. (2006). For management? Management Learning, 37(1), 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colomy, P., & Brown, J. D. (1995). Elaboration, revision, polemic, and progress in the second Chicago school. In G. A. Fine (Ed.), A second Chicago school? The development of a postwar American sociology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S. D. N., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10, 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B., & Sevón, G. (2003a). Introduction: Did the vikings know how to organize? In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.), The Northern lights. Organization theory in Scandinavia. Trelleborg: Liber AB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B., & Sevón, G. (Eds.). (2003b). The Northern lights. Organization theory in Scandinavia. Trelleborg: Liber AB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. (2001). Globalisation, new managerialism, academic capitalism and Entrepreneurialism in Universities: Is the local dimension still important? Comparative Education, 37, 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, Y, J. (1916/1980). Democracy and education. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The middle works of John Dewey, 1899–1924. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1917/1980). The need for a recovery of philosophy. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The middle works of John Dewey, 1899–1924. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1922/1988). Human nature and conduct. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The middle works of John Dewey, 1899–1924. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1925/1981). Experience and nature. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works of John Dewey, 1925–1953. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1925/1984). The development of American pragmatism. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works of John Dewey, 1925–1953. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933/1986). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works of John Dewey, 1925–1953. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1934/1987). Art as experience. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works of John Dewey, 1925–1953. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938/1986). Logic. The theory of inquiry. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works of John Dewey, 1925–1953. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. F. (1949/1991). Knowing and the known. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works of John Dewey, 1925–1953. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey, P., & Steyaert, C. (2007). The troubadours of knowledge: Passion and invention in management education. Organization, 14, 437–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C. (2012). Teaming: How organizations learn, innovate, and compete in the knowledge economy. San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkjaer, B. (2004). Organizational learning: The ‘third way’. Management Learning, 35, 419–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkjaer, B. (2005). Organisational learning: An arena of many voices. In S. Gherardi & D. Nicolini (Eds.), The Passion for Learning and Knowing. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Organizational Learning and Knowledge. Italy: University of Trento.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkjaer, B. (2009). Pragmatism. A learning theory for the future. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning. Learning theorists … in their own words. Abingdon, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkjaer, B., & Huysman, M. (2008). Social worlds theory and the power of tension. In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.), The Sage handbook of new approaches in management and organisation. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research. Tracing the sociomaterial. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, B., & Strauss, A. L. (1978). The Chicago tradition and social change: Thomas, Park and their successors. Symbolic Interaction, 1, 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. (2009). Community of practice or practices of a community? In S. J. Armstrong & C. V. Fukami (Eds.), The Sage handbook of management learning, education and development. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S., & Nicolini, D. (2002). Learning in a constellation of interconnected practices: Canon or dissonance? Jounal of Management Studies, 39, 419–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S., Nicolini, D., & Strati, A. (2007). The passion for knowing. Organization, 14, 315–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsen, B. (2011). The Nordic model of work organization. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2, 463–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halvorsen, T., & Nyhagen, A. (Eds.). (2011). Academic identities—Academic challenges? American and European experience of the transformation of higher education and research. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, F., & Mønsted, M. (2008). Research leadership as entrepreneurial organizing for research. Higher Education, 55, 651–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasle, P., & Sørensen, O. H. (2013). Employees as individually and collectively acting subjects—Key contributions from Nordic working life research. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 3, 9–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendley, K., Sturdy, A., Fincham, R., & Clark, T. (2006). Within and beyond communities of practice: Making sense of learning through participation, identity and practice. The Journal of Management Studies, 43, 641–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. (2015). Looking elsewhere: Howard S. Becker as unwilling organisational theorist. Organization, 22, 769–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Høyrup, S. (2010). Employee-driven innovation and workplace learning: Basic concepts, approaches and themes. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 16, 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S. (2014). Reflections on how the theory of practice architectures is being used in the Nordic context. In K. Rönnerman & P. Salo (Eds.), Lost in practice: Transforming Nordic educational action research. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. (1973/1990). The adult learner: A neglected species. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lægreid, P. (2007). Organization theory: The Scandinavian way. Nordiske Organisasjonsstudier (NOS), 9, 76–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marres, N. (2007). The issues deserve more credit. Pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy. Social Studies of Science, 37, 759–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mørk, B. E., Nicolini, D., Masovic, J., & Hanseth, O. (2015). Expertise as trans-situated. The case of Tavi. OLKC, Organizational Learning and Knowledge Capabilities. Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, P., Nielsen, R. N., Bamberger, S. G., Stamhus, J., Fonager, K., Larsen, A., et al. (2012). Capabilities for innovation: The Nordic model and employee participation. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 2(1), 85–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, P., & Staugaard, H. J. (2012). Professionalisering, decentralisering og styringsmaskering: Paper til Nordisk Konference om professionsforskning, NORPRO, Århus 25–26 oktober 2012. Nordisk Netværk for Professionsforskning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shibutani, T. (1955). Reference groups as perspectives. The American Journal of Sociology, 60, 562–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skou, J. C. (2013). Om heldige valg - eller hvad frøer, krabber og hajer også kan bruges til. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L. (1978). A social world perspective. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 1, 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L. (1982). Interorganizational negotiations. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 11, 350–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L. (1993). Continual permutations of action. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, O. H., Hasle, P., & Madsen, C. U. (2014). Trust, performance and well-being in Nordic working life and management research. 7th Nordic Working Life Conference: Threats and Possibilities Facing Nordic Working Life. University of Gothenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westenholz, A. (2003). Organizational citizens—Unionized wage earners, participative management and beyond. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.), The Northern lights. Organization theory in Scandinavia. Trelleborg: Liber AB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, J., & Kemmis, S. (2015). Practice theory: Viewing leadership as leading. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47, 342–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (2011). Universitetets performancekrav. Viden der tæller. In K. M. Bovbjerg, S. Wright, J. Krause-Jensen, J. B. Krejsler, L. Moos, G. Brorholt, & K. L. G. Salamon (Eds.), Motivation og mismod. Effektivisering og stress på offentlige arbejdspladser. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S., & Williams Ørberg, J. (2008). Autonomy and control: Danish university reform in the context of modern governance. Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 27–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bente Elkjaer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Elkjaer, B. (2018). Knowledge Production as Organisational Learning: The Case of Danish Universities. In: Milana, M., Webb, S., Holford, J., Waller, R., Jarvis, P. (eds) The Palgrave International Handbook on Adult and Lifelong Education and Learning. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55783-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55783-4_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-55782-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55783-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics