Abstract
Young people who grow up in institutions with public-sector responsibility (e.g. residential homes, foster families) are disproportionately affected in nearly all countries by social disadvantages and exclusion. Throughout their educational careers and on their way to adulthood, they often are unable to fall back on family support and are, in this respect, dependent on public infrastructure and extra-familial forms of informal support. As a result, the path to adulthood for these young people, as shown by nearly all international studies, is marked by many barriers to transition. Extensive research indicates that care leavers are one of the most vulnerable and excluded groups among young people.
Educational failure is the root of many problems faced by young care leavers during their transition to adulthood. Although educational policy has been at the centre of European politics for several years, the group constituted of young people growing up under public-sector responsibility has scarcely been considered. To date, social and educational policies have concentrated on the integration of socially disadvantaged young people into the labour market. Consequently, the educational aspirations and capabilities of young people leaving care have been systematically neglected. One can find this lack of awareness of post-secondary education for care leavers in higher education institutions (HEI), in social policy, and in the care facilities.
In this paper, we present results from a mixed-method study of young people in, and after, care. Both, the survey of 237 students (aged 16–18) and the 17 in-depth, narrative interviews with care leavers who entered HIE (aged 18–25) show that young people in care in Germany do receive support in their educational careers. However, this support focuses on certain groups of young people in care: those with severe problems in school and, to a certain extent, also ambitious young people who aim to enter higher education. The cluster analysis of the survey and the narrations of care leavers who entered HEI inform each other and point out that particularly those who come to terms with the demands in school experience less support. This results points out to challenges for both the care and the school system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This research was supported by the Jacobs Foundation. We thank Carolin Jänisch for assistance in developing and analysing the survey, and our colleagues Katharina Mangold and Benjamin Strahl who greatly contributed to this study.
- 2.
After four years of elementary/primary school in Germany, children choose to attend either Gymnasium/upper secondary school (which leads to a degree that allows to study at colleges or universities), or Realschule/intermediary secondary school or Hauptschule/lower secondary school (both lead to a degree that allows to take on an apprenticeship), or a school for children with so-called special needs.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
We chose the squared Euclidean distance as default settings for this procedure and presumed the dichotomized variables as metric. The single-linkage algorithm did not show any outlier. Variables were not standardized on the basis of z scores.
- 6.
Ticked the option ’applies fully’.
References
Albus, S., Greschke, H., Klingler, B., Messmer, H., Micheel, H.-G., Otto, H.-U., et al. (2010). Wirkungsorientierte Jugendhilfe. Münster: Waxmann.
Baur, D., Finkel, M., Hamberger, M., Kühn, A., & Thiersch, H. (1998). Leistungen und Grenzen von Heimerziehung. (JULE-Studie). Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer.
Benbenishty, R., & Shimoni, E. (2012). Educational achivements of children and youth in out of home placements and in community child welfare treatment. Mifgash: Journal of Social-Educational Work, 36(December), 185–204 (Hebrew).
Berridge, D. (2008). Educating difficult adolescents: Effective education for children in public care or with emotional and behavioural difficulties. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Berridge, D. (2012). Educating young people in care: What have we learned? Children and Youth Services Review, 34(6), 1171–1175.
Brodie, I. (2009). Improving educational outcomes for looked-after children and young people. London: Centre for Excellence and Outcomes in Children and Young People’s Services.
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. (2010). Berufsbildungsbericht [National report on education]. Bonn: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.
Bürger, U. (1990). Heimerziehung und soziale Teilnahmechancen. Eine empirische Untersuchung zum Erfolg öffentlicher Erziehung. Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus.
Calmbach, M., Thomas, P. M., Borchard, I., & Flaig, B. (2012). Wie ticken Jugendliche 2012? Lebenswelten von Jugendlichen im Alter von 14 bis 17 Jahren in Deutschland. Düsseldorf: Verlag Haus Altenberg.
Courtney, M. E., Dworsky, A., Lee, J., & Raap, M. (2010). Midwest evaluation of the adult functioning of former foster youth: Outcomes at age 23 and 24. Chicago: Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago.
Esser, K. (2011). Zwischen Albtraum und Dankbarkeit. Ehemalige Heimkinder kommen zu Wort. Freiburg im Breisgau: Lambertus-Verlag.
Fendrich, S., Pothmann, J., & Wilk, A. (2009). Welche Probleme führen zu einer Hilfe zur Erziehung. KOM Dat, 12(3), 5–6.
Fendrich, S., Pothmann, J., & Tabel, A. (2012). Monitor Hilfen zur Erziehung 2012. Dortmund: Eigenverlag Forschungsverbund DJI/TU Dortmund.
Garson, G. D. (2014). Cluster analysis. Asheboro: Statistical Associates Publishers.
Gharabaghi, K. (2012). Translating evidence into practice: Supporting the school performance of young people living in residential group care in Ontario. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 1130–1134.
Hansbauer, P., & Kress, L. (2012). Übergänge in die Zeit nach dem Heim. Ergebnisse aus einem Projekt mit ehemaligen Jugendlichen aus den Erziehungshilfen. Münster: Broschüre herausgegeben von der Diakonie Rheinland-Westfalen-Lippe e.V.
Hiles, D., Moss, D., Wright, J. & Dallos, R. (2013). Young people’s experience of social support during the process of leaving care: A review of the literature. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 2059–2071. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.10.008.
Höjer, I., & Johansson, H. (2013). School as an opportunity and resilience factor of young people placed in care. European Journal of Social Work, 16(1), 22–36.
Hyde-Dryden, G. (2014). Overcoming self-reliance and lack of expectation among care leavers in higher education in England: The role of inter-agency working. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Soziale Arbeit, 9(1), 75–93.
Jackson, S. (2013). Pathways through education for young people in care: Ideas from research and practice. London: British Association for Adoption and Fostering.
Jackson, S., & Cameron, C. (2010). Young people from a public care background: Establishing a baseline of attainment and progression beyond compulsory schooling in five EU countries. London: Thomas Coram Research Unit.
Jackson, S., & Cameron, C. (2011). Young people from a public care background: Pathways to further and higher education in five European countries. London: Thomas Coram Research Unit.
Jackson, S., & Cameron, C. (2012). Leaving care: Looking ahead and aiming higher. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(6), 1107–1114.
Jackson, S., & Cameron, C. (2014). Improving access to further and higher education for young people in public care. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Jackson, S., Ajayi, S., & Quigley, M. (2005). Going to university from care. London: Institute of Education.
Knorth, E., Harder, A., Zandberg, T., & Kendrick, A. (2008). Under one roof. A review and selective meta-analysis on the outcomes of residential child and youth care. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(2), 123–140.
Köngeter, S., Schröer, W., & Zeller, M. (2008). Germany. In M. Stein & E. Munro (Eds.), Young people’s transitions from care to adulthood. International research and practice (pp. 64–78). London/Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Köngeter, S., Mangold, K., & Strahl, B. (2016). Bildung zwischen Heimerziehung und Schule. Ein vergessener Zusammenhang. Weinheim: Juventa.
Melkman, E., Mor-Salwo, Y., Mangold, K., Zeller, M., & Benbenishty, R. (2015). Care leavers as helpers: Motivations for and benefits of helping others. Children and Youth Services Review, 54, 41–48.
Mendes, P. (2010). Moving from dependence to independence. A study of the experiences of 18 care leavers in a leaving care and after care support service in Victoria. Children Australia, 35(1), 14–21.
Montserrat, C., Casas, F., & Malo, S. (2012). Delayed educational pathways and risk of social exclusion: The case of young people from public care in Spain. European Journal of Social Work, 16(1), 6–21.
Müller, H. (2009). Heimerziehung und Bildungsgerechtigkeit: Rahmenbedingungen und Anforderungen für die Kooperation mit Schule. In J. Hast, D. Nüsken, G. Rieken, H. Schlippert, X. Spernau, & M. Zipperle (Eds.), Heimerziehung und Bildung (pp. 149–167). Frankfurt am: IGFH-Eigenverlag.
Nickel, S., & Duong, S. (2012). Studieren ohne Abitur: Monitoring der Entwicklungen in Bund, Ländern und Hochschulen. Gütersloh: CHE Gemeinnütziges Centrum für Hochschulentwicklung.
O’Higgins, A., Sebba, J., & Luke, N. (2015). What is the relationship between being in care and the educational outcomes of children? Oxford: Rees Centre for Research in fostering and education, University of Oxford.
Pfeffer, F. T. (2008). Persistent inequality in educational attainment and its institutional context. European Sociological Review, 24(5), 543–565.
Pothmann, J. (2007). ‘Bildungsverlierer’ – eine Herausforderung für die Heimerziehung. Schulbesuch von 12- bis 17-Jährigen in Heimen und betreuten Wohnformen. Forum Erziehungshilfen, 13(3), 179–188.
Refaeli, T., & Strahl, B. (2014). Turning point processes to higher education among care leavers. Social Work & Society, 12(1). http://www.socwork.net/sws/article/view/388/736.
Refaeli, T., Mangold, K., Köngeter, S., & Zeira, A. (2016). Continuity and discontinuity in the transition from care to adulthood – Challenges for social work research and practice. British Journal of Social Work. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcw016.
Schaffner, D., & Rein, A. (2013). Jugendliche aus einem Sonderschulheim auf dem Weg in die Selbstständigkeit – Übergänge und Verläufe. Anregungen für die Heimpraxis aus der Perspektive von Adressat/innen. In E. M. Piller & S. Schnurr (Eds.), Kinder- und Jugendhilfe in der Schweiz (pp. 53–78). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
Schmidt, M., Schneider, K., Hohm, E., Pickartz, A., Mascnaere, M., Petermann, F., et al. (2002). Effekte erzieherischer Hilfen und ihre Hintergründe. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Sievers, B., Thomas, S., & Zeller, M. (2015). Jugendhilfe – und dann? Zur Gestaltung der Übergänge junger Erwachsener aus stationären Erziehungshilfen - Ein Arbeitsbuch. Frankfurt am Main: Internationale Ges. f. erzieherische Hilfen.
Stein, M. (2006). Research review: Young people leaving care. Child and Family Social Work, 11(3), 273–279.
Stein, M. (2012). Young people leaving care. Supporting pathways to adulthood. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Stein, M., & Munro, E. (Eds.) (2008). Young people’s transitions from care to adulthood. International research and practice. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Trout, A. L., Hagaman, J., Casey, K., Reid, R., & Epstein, M. H. (2008). The academic status of children and youth in out-of-home care: A review of the literature. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(9), 979–994.
Wiedenbeck, M., & Züll, C. (2001). Klassifikation mit Clusteranalyse: Grundlegende Techniken hierarchischer und K-Means-Verfahren. ZUMA-How-to-Reihe. http://www.gesis.org/fileadmin/upload/forschung/publikationen/gesis_reihen/howto/how-to10mwcz.pdf
Zeller, M., & Köngeter, S. (2012). Education in residential care and in school. A social-pedagogical perspective on the educational attainment of young women leaving care. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(6), 1190–1196.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Köngeter, S., Schröer, W., Zeller, M. (2016). The Drawback of Getting By—Implicit Imbalances in the Educational Support of Young People in and Leaving Care in Germany. In: Mendes, P., Snow, P. (eds) Young People Transitioning from Out-of-Home Care. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55639-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55639-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-55638-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55639-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)