Skip to main content

Peer Research with Young People Leaving Care: Reflections from Research in England, Northern Ireland and Argentina

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Young People Transitioning from Out-of-Home Care

Abstract

This chapter draws on the experiences of three care leaver studies from England, Northern Ireland and Argentina, which were each underpinned by a participatory methodology. It considers the experience and impact of utilizing peer research (PR) approaches, outlining the processes of recruiting, training and supporting care leavers to become peer researchers. Benefits for the personal and professional development of peer researchers and for participant recruitment and quality of data are reported. The chapter considers the balance between the additional support and costs of PR with the added value to the study. Lessons for successful PR in care leaver studies are identified, including comprehensive training, practical assistance, assessment of risk, opportunities to co-interview, emotional support and ethical guidance. The continued role of peer researchers during data analysis and dissemination is also highlighted in order to facilitate their engagement with policy makers and service providers, and involvement in research impact activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bourke, L. (2009). Reflections on doing participatory research in health: Participation, method and power. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(5), 457–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, K., Roberts, H., Copperman, J., Downies, A., & Liabo, K. (2004). How come I don’t get asked no questions? Researchinghard to reachchildren and teenagers. Child and Family Social Work, 9, 167–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J., Lee, J., Stein, M., Guhirwa, H., Bowley, S., & Catch 22 Peer Researchers (2015). Corporate parenting for young people in care: Making the difference? London: Catch22.

    Google Scholar 

  • DONCEL and Faculty of Social Sciences in Argentina. (2015). Building independence, a peer research video project. Buenos Aries: DONCEL & FLACSO. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NvxJOOS3A4

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D. (1978). Manual of the general health questionnaire. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, S., & Hill, M. (2005). Researching children’s experiences: Methods and methodological issues. In S. Greene & D. Hogan (Eds.), Researching children’s experiences: Approaches and methods (pp. 1–21). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, S., Ronold, E., Ross, N. J., & Hillman, A. (2010). Power, agency and participatory agendas: A critical exploration of young people’s engagement in participative qualitative research. Childhood, 17, 360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph Rowntree Foundation (2000). Involving young people in research projects, Findings. York: JRF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, R., McCartan, C., McAllister, S., & McKeown, P. (2007). If I am brutally honest, research has never appealed to me…The problems and successes of a peer research project. Education Action Research, 15, 351–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lushey, C., & Munro, E. (2014). Peer research methodology: An effective method for obtaining young people’s perspectives on transitions from care to adulthood? Qualitative Social Work, 14(4), 522–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nind, M. (2011). Participatory data analysis: A step too far? Qualitative Research, 11, 349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R., Monaghan, M., & Broad, B. (2002). Involving young people as co-researchers: Facing up to methodological issues. Qualitative Social Work, 1, 191–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SOVA. (2005). Women into work pilot project evaluation report. Peer mentoring support and resettlement pilot. Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University. https://www.shu.ac.uk/_assets/pdf/hccj-sovareport.pdf. https://www.shu.ac.uk/_assets/pdf/hccj-ResearchMethodology.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 15.

  • Verweijen-Slamnescu, R., & Bowley, S. (2014). Empowering young care leavers through peer research. In T. Stern (Ed.), Action research, innovation and change: International perspectives across disciplines (pp. 89–100). Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • WMTD Catch22 & National Children’s Bureau (2007). What makes the difference? London: WMTD/Catch22 & NCB.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kelly, B., Dixon, J., Incarnato, M. (2016). Peer Research with Young People Leaving Care: Reflections from Research in England, Northern Ireland and Argentina. In: Mendes, P., Snow, P. (eds) Young People Transitioning from Out-of-Home Care. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55639-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55639-4_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-55638-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55639-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics