Advertisement

Negotiating Family/Filial Responsibilities: Reflexivity, Tradition, and Taiwanese (Younger) Professional Men

  • Bo-Wei Chen
  • Mairtin Mac an Ghaill
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter maps out gendered practices among Taiwanese (younger) professional men, examining how they make sense of their gendered identities through local traditions and cultural practices, such as kin values and filial responsibilities. Although existing literature suggests that late modernity is marked by a decline in tradition, such claims are often under-theorized, with little connection to lived experience. The chapter argues that traditions do not disappear but rather become a complex resource in making sense of the men’s gendered identities. By situating gendered reflexivity within the tension between tradition and detraditionalisation, the article brings together some of the theoretical and cultural complexities involved in understanding contemporary gender relations in Taiwan at a time of rapid global change.

Keywords

Filial Piety Ritual Practice Strong Tradition Domestic Chore Late Modernity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adams, M. (2006). Hybridizing habitus and reflexivity: Towards an understanding of contemporary identity? Sociology, 40(3), 511–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adkins, L. (2002). Revisions: Gender and sexuality in late modernity. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, J. C. (1996). Critical reflections on “reflexive modernization”. Theory, Cultural and Society, 13(4), 133–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, U. (1994). Replies and critiques: Self- dissolution and self – endangerment of industrial society: What does this mean? In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  8. Farris, C., Lee, A., & Rubinstein, M. (2004). Women in the new Taiwan: Gender roles and gender consciousness in a changing society, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  9. Finch, J., & Mason, J. (1993). Negotiating family responsibilities. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  11. Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  12. Giddens, A. (1994). Living in a post-traditional society. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  13. Hochschild, A. (1990). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. London: Piatkus.Google Scholar
  14. Jamieson, L. (1998). Intimacy: Personal relationships in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  15. McNay, L. (1999). Gender, habitus and the field: Pierre Bourdieu and the limits of reflexivity. Theory, Culture & Society, 16(1), 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Skeggs, B. (1997). Formations of class and gender: Becoming respectable. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Thompson, J. B. (1996). Tradition and self in a mediated world. In P. Heelas, S. Lash, & P. Morris (Eds.), Detraditionalization: Critical reflections on authority and identity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Weeks, J., Heaphy, B., & Donovan, C. (2001). Same sex intimacies. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Williams, R. (1976). Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
  20. Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bo-Wei Chen
    • 1
  • Mairtin Mac an Ghaill
    • 2
  1. 1.Nanhua UniversityDalinTaiwan
  2. 2.Newman UniversityBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations